<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Better printer test pattern? in General Discussion</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Better-printer-test-pattern/m-p/321887#M22061</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know of a better printer test pattern that does a thorough nozzle check AND doesn't waste so much ink?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The existing test pattern for the printer seems to uselessly waste a ton of ink. Isn't there a more efficient and economical test pattern that tests the print head?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2020 18:10:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bmw1racer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-10-18T18:10:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Better printer test pattern?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Better-printer-test-pattern/m-p/321887#M22061</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know of a better printer test pattern that does a thorough nozzle check AND doesn't waste so much ink?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The existing test pattern for the printer seems to uselessly waste a ton of ink. Isn't there a more efficient and economical test pattern that tests the print head?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2020 18:10:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Better-printer-test-pattern/m-p/321887#M22061</guid>
      <dc:creator>bmw1racer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-18T18:10:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better printer test pattern?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Better-printer-test-pattern/m-p/322688#M22062</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The better question is; how can the &lt;STRONG&gt;excessive&lt;/STRONG&gt; cleaning cycles be reduced or stopped?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I get the purpoose, but the number and lengthe are excessive, especially if you print often.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:34:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Better-printer-test-pattern/m-p/322688#M22062</guid>
      <dc:creator>videobruce</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-26T14:34:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better printer test pattern?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Better-printer-test-pattern/m-p/322726#M22063</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have read that leaving the printer on all the time would help save ink, because the printer wouldn't have to execute a startup/priming cycle when first turned on. Seems to make sense, but I'm not sure if it's true.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2020 20:57:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Better-printer-test-pattern/m-p/322726#M22063</guid>
      <dc:creator>bmw1racer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-26T20:57:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

