<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Using old lense in General Discussion</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Using-old-lense/m-p/192647#M17074</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 18:30:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>GramT</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-11-22T18:30:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Using old lense</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Using-old-lense/m-p/192640#M17071</link>
      <description>Would a Quarry Master Zoom-Macro&lt;BR /&gt;37mm - 105mm 1:35 work on a new digital canon body? I have it on a Canon AT-1.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 16:58:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Using-old-lense/m-p/192640#M17071</guid>
      <dc:creator>GramT</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-22T16:58:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using old lense</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Using-old-lense/m-p/192642#M17072</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The AT-1 is an FD mount camera, so the lens is not compatible with the newer EF lens mount. You can probably get an adapter, but it will be manual only and no autofocus, so probably not worth it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 17:36:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Using-old-lense/m-p/192642#M17072</guid>
      <dc:creator>kvbarkley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-22T17:36:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using old lense</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Using-old-lense/m-p/192646#M17073</link>
      <description>Thank you for your quick response.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 18:29:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Using-old-lense/m-p/192646#M17073</guid>
      <dc:creator>GramT</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-22T18:29:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using old lense</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Using-old-lense/m-p/192647#M17074</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 18:30:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Using-old-lense/m-p/192647#M17074</guid>
      <dc:creator>GramT</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-22T18:30:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using old lense</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Using-old-lense/m-p/192754#M17075</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;"...so probably not worth it."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Not probably, absolutely not worth it. &amp;nbsp;&lt;img id="smileyfrustrated" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyfrustrated" src="https://community.usa.canon.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-frustrated.png" alt="Smiley Frustrated" title="Smiley Frustrated" /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 16:43:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/General-Discussion/Using-old-lense/m-p/192754#M17075</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-23T16:43:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

