<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Canon R7 body only or kit lens? in EOS DSLR &amp; Mirrorless Cameras</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Canon-R7-body-only-or-kit-lens/m-p/398191#M94571</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Come back into photography and I’m looking to upgrade my 60D to the R7. From what I’ve seen, the 18-150 looks to be a much better kit lens all around over the 18-135 which I rarely used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the Nifty Fifty (probably upgrade to the RF version. 18-135 kit lens 70-200F4L IS Tamron 17-55 2.8 (on my camera 90% of the time)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Probably looking at the Tamron 100-400 at the next lens upgrade.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the 18-150 a good option for a walk around lens over the 17-55? I don’t need the long reach but the size and weight make it sound like it’s a good walk around lens.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2022 16:14:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>denji</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-12-16T16:14:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Canon R7 body only or kit lens?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Canon-R7-body-only-or-kit-lens/m-p/398191#M94571</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Come back into photography and I’m looking to upgrade my 60D to the R7. From what I’ve seen, the 18-150 looks to be a much better kit lens all around over the 18-135 which I rarely used.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the Nifty Fifty (probably upgrade to the RF version. 18-135 kit lens 70-200F4L IS Tamron 17-55 2.8 (on my camera 90% of the time)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Probably looking at the Tamron 100-400 at the next lens upgrade.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the 18-150 a good option for a walk around lens over the 17-55? I don’t need the long reach but the size and weight make it sound like it’s a good walk around lens.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2022 16:14:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Canon-R7-body-only-or-kit-lens/m-p/398191#M94571</guid>
      <dc:creator>denji</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-16T16:14:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Canon R7 body only or kit lens?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Canon-R7-body-only-or-kit-lens/m-p/398198#M94572</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;IS the 18-150 a good option? &amp;nbsp;No.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A zoom ratio ia zoom lens is the ratio of the longest focal length to the shortest. &amp;nbsp;A lens with a zoom ratio approaching 8 or more fall into the super zoom category. &amp;nbsp;The super zooms are notorious for not having the best image quality at the longest and shortest focal lengths. &amp;nbsp;The best zoom lens have a zoom ratio of 3 or 4 to 1, or smaller.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2022 16:44:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Canon-R7-body-only-or-kit-lens/m-p/398198#M94572</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-12-16T16:44:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

