<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Digitizing slides with an EOS Rebel T6s in EOS DSLR &amp; Mirrorless Cameras</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Digitizing-slides-with-an-EOS-Rebel-T6s/m-p/385274#M90964</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I think you could compose the image and let camera determine the exposure. depth of field and motion won’t be issues, so you don’t need to be preselecting a particular setting. Add exposure comp if necessary to account for any influence of the aspect ratio difference.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 19:43:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jrhoffman75</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-09-08T19:43:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Digitizing slides with an EOS Rebel T6s</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Digitizing-slides-with-an-EOS-Rebel-T6s/m-p/385256#M90961</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;(I want to talk about something besides 3rd party RF lenses)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I volunteered to digitize some old slides. No problem, I thought, since I have a slide scanner. It turns out these are (I think!) 127 film, 1-5/8 square, which while they fit in the scanner, the scanner only scans the 35mm area, so I lose 30 % or so of the slide.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One option is to use my T6S and 60mm macro lens and copy them that way (Though that is not ideal since I will be transferring a square slide to a 3:2 format, so I will only get 2666 pixels on a side with a lot of wasted space.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a test, I am going to put some wax paper on the window, and shoot some test shots.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any thoughts as to good settings to use?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(If the test shots come out OK, I will get a light box and macro rail)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 18:28:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Digitizing-slides-with-an-EOS-Rebel-T6s/m-p/385256#M90961</guid>
      <dc:creator>kvbarkley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-08T18:28:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Digitizing slides with an EOS Rebel T6s</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Digitizing-slides-with-an-EOS-Rebel-T6s/m-p/385273#M90963</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000FF"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;(I want to talk about something besides 3rd party RF lenses)&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp; Totally agree - THANK YOU!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That's a bit of a challenge, given that you will always be tied to the native 3x2 format in your camera.&amp;nbsp; I sent some slides that I had to a bureau in the US and they scanned them for me, and they did a good job at reasonable prices.&amp;nbsp; I think they have the ability to deal with square format using their specialist gear, FWIW.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 19:38:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Digitizing-slides-with-an-EOS-Rebel-T6s/m-p/385273#M90963</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tronhard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-08T19:38:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Digitizing slides with an EOS Rebel T6s</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Digitizing-slides-with-an-EOS-Rebel-T6s/m-p/385274#M90964</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think you could compose the image and let camera determine the exposure. depth of field and motion won’t be issues, so you don’t need to be preselecting a particular setting. Add exposure comp if necessary to account for any influence of the aspect ratio difference.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 19:43:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Digitizing-slides-with-an-EOS-Rebel-T6s/m-p/385274#M90964</guid>
      <dc:creator>jrhoffman75</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-08T19:43:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Digitizing slides with an EOS Rebel T6s</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Digitizing-slides-with-an-EOS-Rebel-T6s/m-p/385275#M90965</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What brand slide scanner?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 19:46:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Digitizing-slides-with-an-EOS-Rebel-T6s/m-p/385275#M90965</guid>
      <dc:creator>jrhoffman75</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-08T19:46:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Digitizing slides with an EOS Rebel T6s</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Digitizing-slides-with-an-EOS-Rebel-T6s/m-p/385279#M90966</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Minolta Dual Scan IV. I use VueScan with it, since the manual lists a Pentium 166 MHz / Power PC G3 for the software specs. Though actually, I think the mirror is getting pretty dirty and the lamp pretty dim since it seems to spot a lot.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 20:05:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Digitizing-slides-with-an-EOS-Rebel-T6s/m-p/385279#M90966</guid>
      <dc:creator>kvbarkley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-08T20:05:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Digitizing slides with an EOS Rebel T6s</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Digitizing-slides-with-an-EOS-Rebel-T6s/m-p/385306#M90970</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you have the software to stitch together images in a panoramic shot?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my experience, any flat bed scanner easily outperforms any consumer camera on the market. &amp;nbsp;The number of DPI from a scanner way outperforms a DSLR. &amp;nbsp;The only way [a] DSLR can come close is to use a macro lens to sample portions of the subject just like you would create a single landscape panoramic image. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You may have to capture multiple rows of images with a 5x macro lens to even come close to your average flat bed scanner. &amp;nbsp;But it sounds like you’re sampling small negatives, which only makes the high resolution issues more [acute] when trying to capture the entire sample in a single shot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[ Think “life size” on the image sensor. ]&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Back to the top, if you have software that can stitch together multiple images from your scanner into a composite whole, then that may be your best option with your current gear.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 02:04:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Digitizing-slides-with-an-EOS-Rebel-T6s/m-p/385306#M90970</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-09T02:04:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Digitizing slides with an EOS Rebel T6s</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Digitizing-slides-with-an-EOS-Rebel-T6s/m-p/385309#M90971</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have Photomerge in Photoshop elements. I have heard conflicting things about the scanner vs the DSLR, which is why I want to try it. If I zoom in to life size (1:1)* I should be getting close to the scanner resolution so I can see if a scanner buys me much.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;*(6000 pixels for .878 inches (22.3 mm) or 5260 dpi.)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 02:46:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Digitizing-slides-with-an-EOS-Rebel-T6s/m-p/385309#M90971</guid>
      <dc:creator>kvbarkley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-09T02:46:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

