<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: loss of sharpness 100-400 using R5 and adapter in EOS DSLR &amp; Mirrorless Cameras</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/337125#M76086</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/47368"&gt;@johninbigd&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;One other weird thing I'm noticing is that some images look like they have motion blur, even at high shutter speeds like 1/320. And this is when working with a model in a portrait session. &lt;U&gt;&lt;EM&gt;She was moving a fair amount&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/U&gt;, but I have no idea how I could have motion blur at 1/320 with her. I wonder if there is some incompatibility with those non-Canon lenses and the IBIS on the R5. I'll have to do some testing with it turned off. The downside to that is that on the R5, it is controlled by the IS switch on the lens, so that means I either get lens IS plus IBIS, or no IS at all.&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry, but 1/320 is not generally regarded as a "high shutter speed". &amp;nbsp;"High shutter speed"s are generally upwards of 1/1000 for full frame cameras, and 1/1600 for APS-C cameras.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[EDIT]. Professional models learn how to move, and freeze in a pose for the photographer. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2021 13:53:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-03-14T13:53:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>loss of sharpness 100-400 using R5 and adapter</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323253#M76051</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have been noticing my bird shots are not as sharp as they use to be using the Control ring mount adapter EF_EOS R for the 100-400L vii lens. I decided to do a test comparison between the R5 and the 5Dm4. I kept all settings the same on both cameras. When I manual focused I used the LCD magnifier to be exact. At first I thought it may be the lens. But comparing between both cameras, I definitely see I get sharper photos with my 5D! Are we losing something when we put the adapter on? see the photos below. Is it the adapter? communication?&amp;nbsp;&lt;IMG src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/25722i7C3D733F20DFB05C/image-size/original?v=1.0&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="Auto focus compare-1.jpg" title="Auto focus compare-1.jpg" /&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/25723i2CF83038A1B780B3/image-size/original?v=1.0&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="Auto focus compare-1.jpg" title="Auto focus compare-1.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2020 15:34:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323253#M76051</guid>
      <dc:creator>bobbieturner1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-01T15:34:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: loss of sharpness 100-400 using R5 and adapter</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323256#M76052</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The pictures are pretty telling. I hope that’s not the case. I just ordered one and have a 5D mk iv and iii. Did you try a micro adjustment with the adaptor using a lens align tool?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2020 16:25:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323256#M76052</guid>
      <dc:creator>Canoncan59</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-01T16:25:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: loss of sharpness 100-400 using R5 and adapter</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323259#M76053</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It is impossible to do &amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Autofocus microadjustment (AFMA)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;with the R5 because it uses Contrast detection AF.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The R5 has an option for "Dual Pixel RAW" but I don't believe it is meant to correct for poor focus.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://cam.start.canon/en/C003/manual/html/UG-03_Shooting-1_0040.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://cam.start.canon/en/C003/manual/html/UG-03_Shooting-1_0040.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/25724iE4DC33781E7A2E51/image-size/large?v=1.0&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="0BDA401D-DBA2-4176-99D8-E0C34AE63A04.jpeg" title="0BDA401D-DBA2-4176-99D8-E0C34AE63A04.jpeg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2020 17:58:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323259#M76053</guid>
      <dc:creator>MikeSowsun</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-01T17:58:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: loss of sharpness 100-400 using R5 and adapter</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323263#M76054</link>
      <description>Are these RAWs or JPEGS? Do they have the same sharpening applied? This is also a 30 MP vs a 45 MP. Is the magnification the same?</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2020 17:42:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323263#M76054</guid>
      <dc:creator>kvbarkley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-01T17:42:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: loss of sharpness 100-400 using R5 and adapter</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323267#M76055</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Was not aware as mine has not arrived. Good to know, quick question then, i had to micro adjust my 500 f4L on both my 5DMk3 and 5dmk4, now i am worried about the R5&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2020 18:08:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323267#M76055</guid>
      <dc:creator>Canoncan59</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-01T18:08:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: loss of sharpness 100-400 using R5 and adapter</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323269#M76056</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I say it is Operator Error. &amp;nbsp;Why haven't you posted the actual exposure settings? &amp;nbsp;Why the color differences?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your posted images would suggest that they were shot at 400mm, with an aperture of f5.0. &amp;nbsp;That's not possible. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;[EDIT]. I think you are seeing camera shake in the R5, BTW. &amp;nbsp;Operator Error.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2020 18:13:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323269#M76056</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-01T18:13:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: loss of sharpness 100-400 using R5 and adapter</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323270#M76057</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/154183"&gt;@Canoncan59&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Was not aware as mine has not arrived. Good to know, quick question then, i had to micro adjust my 500 f4L on both my 5DMk3 and 5dmk4, now i am worried about the R5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;This "test" appears to be fundamentally flawed. &amp;nbsp;I would ignore it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2020 18:14:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323270#M76057</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-01T18:14:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: loss of sharpness 100-400 using R5 and adapter</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323280#M76058</link>
      <description>no camera shake since it was on a tripod of course. I will repost with actual exposure settings.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2020 19:06:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323280#M76058</guid>
      <dc:creator>bobbieturner1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-01T19:06:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: loss of sharpness 100-400 using R5 and adapter</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323281#M76059</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;no post processing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;magnifications were the same&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2020 19:09:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323281#M76059</guid>
      <dc:creator>bobbieturner1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-01T19:09:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: loss of sharpness 100-400 using R5 and adapter</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323282#M76060</link>
      <description>Thank you&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2020 19:10:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323282#M76060</guid>
      <dc:creator>bobbieturner1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-01T19:10:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: loss of sharpness 100-400 using R5 and adapter</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323283#M76061</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/154176"&gt;@bobbieturner1&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;no camera shake since it was on a tripod of course. I will repost with actual exposure settings.&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;That is a false assumption. &amp;nbsp;It depends on the quality of your rig, and mirror lockup is advisable for critical focus, especially at 45MP. &amp;nbsp;Also, did you have IS turned on or off. &amp;nbsp;Like I said, your "test" appears to be fundamentally flawed on many levels.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2020 19:42:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323283#M76061</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-01T19:42:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: loss of sharpness 100-400 using R5 and adapter</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323287#M76062</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Mirror lockup?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Depending on the raw processor, different amounts of sharpening may be applied for the default settints, which may vary between cameras.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2020 19:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323287#M76062</guid>
      <dc:creator>kvbarkley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-01T19:48:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: loss of sharpness 100-400 using R5 and adapter</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323290#M76063</link>
      <description>Yes IS was off. However when I went back to check my R6 I noticed I had it set on mechanical shutter.&lt;BR /&gt;The bottom line is my images are not as sharp as my 5D and I have to figure it out. I have to figure out how not to have a “flawed” test and do it again.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2020 19:54:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323290#M76063</guid>
      <dc:creator>bobbieturner1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-01T19:54:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: loss of sharpness 100-400 using R5 and adapter</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323291#M76064</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/74913"&gt;@kvbarkley&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mirror lockup?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Depending on the raw processor, different amounts of sharpening may be applied for the default settints, which may vary between cameras.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yeah, I know. &amp;nbsp;Mirrorless. &amp;nbsp;Electronic shutter, then. &amp;nbsp;Irregardless, leaving IS turned on would be a mistake.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2020 19:54:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323291#M76064</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-01T19:54:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: loss of sharpness 100-400 using R5 and adapter</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323292#M76065</link>
      <description>No I did not do mirror lockup and yes I turned off my IS on the lens.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2020 20:17:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323292#M76065</guid>
      <dc:creator>bobbieturner1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-01T20:17:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: loss of sharpness 100-400 using R5 and adapter</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323293#M76066</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/154176"&gt;@bobbieturner1&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Yes IS was off. However when I went back to check my R6 I noticed I had it set on mechanical shutter.&lt;BR /&gt;The bottom line is my images are not as sharp as my 5D and I have to figure it out. I have to figure out how not to have a “flawed” test and do it again.&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see. &amp;nbsp;Have you tried comparing AF, too? &amp;nbsp;Right now, it looks like you simply missed focus on the R5.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BTW, when did we switch from the R5 to the R6?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2020 20:40:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323293#M76066</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-01T20:40:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: loss of sharpness 100-400 using R5 and adapter</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323294#M76067</link>
      <description>Yikes. I meant R5</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2020 20:48:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323294#M76067</guid>
      <dc:creator>bobbieturner1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-01T20:48:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: loss of sharpness 100-400 using R5 and adapter</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323692#M76068</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Canon just put out a firmware update for that lens.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2020 17:55:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/323692#M76068</guid>
      <dc:creator>Windsun33</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-11-06T17:55:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: loss of sharpness 100-400 using R5 and adapter</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/333714#M76069</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm having the same problem with my R5. I've done a few shoots with it and my results are absolutely not as sharp as with the EOS R. It's really frustrating and I haven't figured out the cause yet.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2021 23:19:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/333714#M76069</guid>
      <dc:creator>johninbigd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-06T23:19:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: loss of sharpness 100-400 using R5 and adapter</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/333747#M76070</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;FWIW:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://edit.photography/canon-r5-sensor-misalignment-issue-confirmed-no-sharp-images-with-any-lens/" target="_blank"&gt;Canon R5 Sensor Misalignment Issue CONFIRMED – No Sharp Images with Any Lens – Edit Photography&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2021 15:21:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/loss-of-sharpness-100-400-using-R5-and-adapter/m-p/333747#M76070</guid>
      <dc:creator>jrhoffman75</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-07T15:21:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

