<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Image quality with the Canon 5Dmark 2 vs.. The 5Dmark3? in EOS DSLR &amp; Mirrorless Cameras</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Image-quality-with-the-Canon-5Dmark-2-vs-The-5Dmark3/m-p/25197#M3179</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The primary advantage of a Mk3 over the Mk2 is the AF. &amp;nbsp;More points and it can focus with f/8. &amp;nbsp; If your Leica lens is manual focus then you wouldn't care about it. &amp;nbsp;The 5D3 has a little of an advantage in the ISO but not a huge factor. &amp;nbsp;Other than that I'd say IQ is the same.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 03:15:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>diverhank</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-23T03:15:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Image quality with the Canon 5Dmark 2 vs.. The 5Dmark3?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Image-quality-with-the-Canon-5Dmark-2-vs-The-5Dmark3/m-p/25193#M3178</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I use Leica lenses on a canon body with an adapter.&amp;nbsp; Is the image quality with the Canon 5Dmark 2 vs.the 5Dmark3 similar?&amp;nbsp; Any reason to get one vs. the other?&amp;nbsp; I like the idea, that I can change the viewfinder screens on the Mk 2. Any overwhelming improvement of the&amp;nbsp; 5Dmark 3 that would warrant consideration?&amp;nbsp; Thanks to those who have used both camera bodies.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 02:06:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Image-quality-with-the-Canon-5Dmark-2-vs-The-5Dmark3/m-p/25193#M3178</guid>
      <dc:creator>ryee3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-23T02:06:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Image quality with the Canon 5Dmark 2 vs.. The 5Dmark3?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Image-quality-with-the-Canon-5Dmark-2-vs-The-5Dmark3/m-p/25197#M3179</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The primary advantage of a Mk3 over the Mk2 is the AF. &amp;nbsp;More points and it can focus with f/8. &amp;nbsp; If your Leica lens is manual focus then you wouldn't care about it. &amp;nbsp;The 5D3 has a little of an advantage in the ISO but not a huge factor. &amp;nbsp;Other than that I'd say IQ is the same.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 03:15:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Image-quality-with-the-Canon-5Dmark-2-vs-The-5Dmark3/m-p/25197#M3179</guid>
      <dc:creator>diverhank</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-23T03:15:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

