<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: soft 5D Mk III in EOS DSLR &amp; Mirrorless Cameras</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/soft-5D-Mk-III/m-p/160751#M24413</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"This move is no less than that."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes sir that is true.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 17:31:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-01-04T17:31:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>soft 5D Mk III</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/soft-5D-Mk-III/m-p/160648#M24408</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I got a Mk II a few months back. Was using a 5D with very good results. I use mostly a 70-210 2.8 &amp;amp; a 24-70 2.8 for product images in studio with strobes. My first impression was everything is really smooth. So much so that it is looking soft. I am looking for images that are full range of tones and punchy. I had it down with the 5D but the MK III is still not quite there yet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is the larger sensor going to require more shapening, saturation and contrast?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ric&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2016 21:33:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/soft-5D-Mk-III/m-p/160648#M24408</guid>
      <dc:creator>ric27</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-03T21:33:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: soft 5D Mk III</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/soft-5D-Mk-III/m-p/160728#M24409</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"Is the larger sensor going to require more shapening, saturation and contrast?"&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The 5D Mk III is better in every aspect to either the 5D or the 5D Mk II. &amp;nbsp;Can you show a sample?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;You are shooting RAW and using a psot editor like Lightroom or Photoshop?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 14:35:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/soft-5D-Mk-III/m-p/160728#M24409</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-04T14:35:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: soft 5D Mk III</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/soft-5D-Mk-III/m-p/160734#M24410</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes I am shooting in raw and us DPP or Photoshop to process. I do agree that the 5d3 is superior. Rather than soft maybe the word is smooth. So smooth that there seems to be a lack of 3 dementionality.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So back to my question, "is the larger sensor going to require more adjustment that a sensor the same size that has less MP&amp;nbsp; "&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ric&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 15:50:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/soft-5D-Mk-III/m-p/160734#M24410</guid>
      <dc:creator>ric27</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-04T15:50:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: soft 5D Mk III</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/soft-5D-Mk-III/m-p/160744#M24411</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"... is the larger sensor going to require more adjustment that a sensor the same size that has less MP"&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;No. &amp;nbsp;It does not. &amp;nbsp;It should need less. &amp;nbsp;That is what I tried to get across with the it's better comment.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I shoot a 1Ds Mk III with a 20mp FF sensor. &amp;nbsp;It takes the least amount of "help" from post of any camera I ever used.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I had all of the 5D models at one time or other (not the new 5Ds). &amp;nbsp;I can easily say the 5D Mk III is a fantastic camera. &amp;nbsp;What is does, it does very well.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 16:41:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/soft-5D-Mk-III/m-p/160744#M24411</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-04T16:41:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: soft 5D Mk III</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/soft-5D-Mk-III/m-p/160746#M24412</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Ebiggs, that helps. I have been getting good usable images with the MkIII. It is&amp;nbsp;definitely a race horse I will have to learn to handle. My last move was from a 20d to the 5D and that was remarkable. This move is no less than that.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 16:59:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/soft-5D-Mk-III/m-p/160746#M24412</guid>
      <dc:creator>ric27</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-04T16:59:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: soft 5D Mk III</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/soft-5D-Mk-III/m-p/160751#M24413</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"This move is no less than that."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes sir that is true.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2016 17:31:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/soft-5D-Mk-III/m-p/160751#M24413</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-01-04T17:31:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

