<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic The M: Back soon? in EOS DSLR &amp; Mirrorless Cameras</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/The-M-Back-soon/m-p/150241#M23221</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It looks as though the M series may soon&amp;nbsp;be back in the North American market after a hiatus of two or three years. Canon's USA Web xite now lists a forthcoming M-3 with what appears to be a somewhat contemporary range of features (24+ MP APS-C sensor, 49 AF points, etc.).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Two questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-&amp;nbsp; Who in the group will be first to buy one and report back to the rest of us whether it's any good or not?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-&amp;nbsp; Can we trust the M series to stick around for the long haul this time?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 17:42:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RobertTheFat</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-08-29T17:42:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>The M: Back soon?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/The-M-Back-soon/m-p/150241#M23221</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It looks as though the M series may soon&amp;nbsp;be back in the North American market after a hiatus of two or three years. Canon's USA Web xite now lists a forthcoming M-3 with what appears to be a somewhat contemporary range of features (24+ MP APS-C sensor, 49 AF points, etc.).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Two questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-&amp;nbsp; Who in the group will be first to buy one and report back to the rest of us whether it's any good or not?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-&amp;nbsp; Can we trust the M series to stick around for the long haul this time?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 17:42:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/The-M-Back-soon/m-p/150241#M23221</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertTheFat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-29T17:42:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The M: Back soon?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/The-M-Back-soon/m-p/150296#M23222</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Who in the group will be first to buy one and report back to the rest of us whether it's any good or not? &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &lt;STRONG&gt;Not me.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can we trust the M series to stick around for the long haul this time? &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt; Hope not.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2015 14:24:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/The-M-Back-soon/m-p/150296#M23222</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-30T14:24:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The M: Back soon?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/The-M-Back-soon/m-p/150301#M23223</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I confess to being curious about this. &amp;nbsp;It occurs to me that, if modified (to replace the IR filter) it would probably be a great astro-imaging camera and fully compatibile with the vast amount of astro-imaging software already written to be compatible with Canon cameras (which usually just requires that the camera have a Canon DIGIC III or higher processor.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2015 14:51:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/The-M-Back-soon/m-p/150301#M23223</guid>
      <dc:creator>TCampbell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-30T14:51:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

