<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic 5D3 - side AF point performance variation in EOS DSLR &amp; Mirrorless Cameras</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/5D3-side-AF-point-performance-variation/m-p/14755#M1802</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'd like to greet everybody since I'm new to this forum.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have noticed something peculiar about my 5D3 and how it behaves with fast primes.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The body is actually a replacement. The first one had its focus all over the place (I was unable to set a constant MA). The one I'm having now is much more consistent though there's still a thing that troubles me a bit.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;With my 35L (which I found quite reliable on 5D2 using the center point), the focus seems right with the center points. OK, there may be a spare frame completely OOF for no particular reason once in a while, but I'm quite used to it on Canon bodies and it happens very rarely so I can't complain here.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;When moving the focus point to either side, however, I find that the left side still works pretty well, however the&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;right-most&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;cross sensor column and the subsequent line-sensitive sensors get very random, with a strong bias towards front focusing. They still may focus properly in 30-50% cases (dependending on a subject, lighting and distance), sometimes even more when the target is EXTREMELY contrasty (like a operating TV set or large contrasty patterns) but the difference is clearly visible as these points are not reliable at all.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Now, one could think it may be some kind of misalignment, but... I attach my 85 1.8 and, voila! - all AF points seem to be perfect, except for... the very&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;left-most&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;column (line-sensitive points)!!!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;And the 135L does not seem to be affected at all! All points equally reliable!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;There is also a 24LII that can get really random in the entire operating range, but it was like this on the 5D2 so it's no big suprise really. However, I still find the 5 central double cross AF points much more reliable than the rest with this lens.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Now, I'm still far for blaming the body at this point, especially that there is some contradicting behavior depending on the lens used and I really want to believe that you can't be unlucky enough to receive two lemon 5D3s in a row. But I'm trying hard to understand what might be going on here and I just can't.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I thought that maybe the 35L is decentered or something but I've done a quick test when I compared corner sharpness with the lens and it seems to be ok in that respect.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, I have met another guy in a Polish Canon forum that has exactly the same problem with this body+lens combination. So far, he's been clueless too.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Any ideas, guys? Has anyone noticed the same? What could the reason be?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tomdz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-02-17T17:51:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>5D3 - side AF point performance variation</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/5D3-side-AF-point-performance-variation/m-p/14755#M1802</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'd like to greet everybody since I'm new to this forum.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have noticed something peculiar about my 5D3 and how it behaves with fast primes.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The body is actually a replacement. The first one had its focus all over the place (I was unable to set a constant MA). The one I'm having now is much more consistent though there's still a thing that troubles me a bit.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;With my 35L (which I found quite reliable on 5D2 using the center point), the focus seems right with the center points. OK, there may be a spare frame completely OOF for no particular reason once in a while, but I'm quite used to it on Canon bodies and it happens very rarely so I can't complain here.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;When moving the focus point to either side, however, I find that the left side still works pretty well, however the&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;right-most&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;cross sensor column and the subsequent line-sensitive sensors get very random, with a strong bias towards front focusing. They still may focus properly in 30-50% cases (dependending on a subject, lighting and distance), sometimes even more when the target is EXTREMELY contrasty (like a operating TV set or large contrasty patterns) but the difference is clearly visible as these points are not reliable at all.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Now, one could think it may be some kind of misalignment, but... I attach my 85 1.8 and, voila! - all AF points seem to be perfect, except for... the very&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;left-most&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;column (line-sensitive points)!!!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;And the 135L does not seem to be affected at all! All points equally reliable!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;There is also a 24LII that can get really random in the entire operating range, but it was like this on the 5D2 so it's no big suprise really. However, I still find the 5 central double cross AF points much more reliable than the rest with this lens.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Now, I'm still far for blaming the body at this point, especially that there is some contradicting behavior depending on the lens used and I really want to believe that you can't be unlucky enough to receive two lemon 5D3s in a row. But I'm trying hard to understand what might be going on here and I just can't.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I thought that maybe the 35L is decentered or something but I've done a quick test when I compared corner sharpness with the lens and it seems to be ok in that respect.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, I have met another guy in a Polish Canon forum that has exactly the same problem with this body+lens combination. So far, he's been clueless too.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Any ideas, guys? Has anyone noticed the same? What could the reason be?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/5D3-side-AF-point-performance-variation/m-p/14755#M1802</guid>
      <dc:creator>tomdz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-17T17:51:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

