<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: R10 to R7 or R6 Mark II in EOS DSLR &amp; Mirrorless Cameras</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R10-to-R7-or-R6-Mark-II/m-p/533397#M129550</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I did a lot of research buying into the Canon R system for wildlife photography.&amp;nbsp; I wanted the RF200-800 lens and the best camera that I could afford for it, which for me is the R6 Mark II.&amp;nbsp; Because of the full frame sized sensor AND less megapixels on that sensor that the R7 has on it's APC-S sensor, the pixel are larger and thus gather more light.&amp;nbsp; Therefore the sensor is much more sensitive to lower light, which is a big deal in wildlife photography.&amp;nbsp; The 200-800 is not a fast lens, but the low light ability of the R6 Mark II really helps with that.&amp;nbsp; As an example this morning was very overcast and gloomy..&amp;nbsp; I shot these Hooded Mergansers from about 80-100 yards, 1/1000. F9, ISO 16000.&amp;nbsp; I have increased the exposure a little and used noise reduction in Lightroom, but I'm not sure I would get that picture without the lower light ability of the camera.&amp;nbsp; I think it may have been darker and possibly less sharp with the R7, I can't say for sure never having used an R7 but pixel size does make a difference in light gathering.&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="20250208-Canon EOS R6m2-006-Enhanced-NR.jpg" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/63915iEDD5D8CE83A40384/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="20250208-Canon EOS R6m2-006-Enhanced-NR.jpg" alt="20250208-Canon EOS R6m2-006-Enhanced-NR.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2025 00:54:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TomRamsey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-02-09T00:54:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>R10 to R7 or R6 Mark II</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R10-to-R7-or-R6-Mark-II/m-p/533365#M129542</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I currently use an R10 with an RF 100-400 lens for backyard wildlife photography. I’m considering the R7 or R6 Mark II if the price drops in the weeks/months ahead. Will there be an appreciable difference in the experience (other than the shorter reach with the 6)? Thank you.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2025 21:00:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R10-to-R7-or-R6-Mark-II/m-p/533365#M129542</guid>
      <dc:creator>TandemYards</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-08T21:00:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R10 to R7 or R6 Mark II</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R10-to-R7-or-R6-Mark-II/m-p/533373#M129545</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is your current camera limiting you in anyway. Would you like to stay with APS-C or move to Full Frame. Would IBIS better assist you with the lens based IS in your current lens.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2025 21:24:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R10-to-R7-or-R6-Mark-II/m-p/533373#M129545</guid>
      <dc:creator>deebatman316</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-08T21:24:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R10 to R7 or R6 Mark II</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R10-to-R7-or-R6-Mark-II/m-p/533392#M129549</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you currently have RF-S or EF-S lenses, they will work on the R6 but severely cripple it by limiting you to an APS-C sized chunk of the sensor.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2025 00:28:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R10-to-R7-or-R6-Mark-II/m-p/533392#M129549</guid>
      <dc:creator>kvbarkley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-09T00:28:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R10 to R7 or R6 Mark II</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R10-to-R7-or-R6-Mark-II/m-p/533397#M129550</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I did a lot of research buying into the Canon R system for wildlife photography.&amp;nbsp; I wanted the RF200-800 lens and the best camera that I could afford for it, which for me is the R6 Mark II.&amp;nbsp; Because of the full frame sized sensor AND less megapixels on that sensor that the R7 has on it's APC-S sensor, the pixel are larger and thus gather more light.&amp;nbsp; Therefore the sensor is much more sensitive to lower light, which is a big deal in wildlife photography.&amp;nbsp; The 200-800 is not a fast lens, but the low light ability of the R6 Mark II really helps with that.&amp;nbsp; As an example this morning was very overcast and gloomy..&amp;nbsp; I shot these Hooded Mergansers from about 80-100 yards, 1/1000. F9, ISO 16000.&amp;nbsp; I have increased the exposure a little and used noise reduction in Lightroom, but I'm not sure I would get that picture without the lower light ability of the camera.&amp;nbsp; I think it may have been darker and possibly less sharp with the R7, I can't say for sure never having used an R7 but pixel size does make a difference in light gathering.&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="20250208-Canon EOS R6m2-006-Enhanced-NR.jpg" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/63915iEDD5D8CE83A40384/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="20250208-Canon EOS R6m2-006-Enhanced-NR.jpg" alt="20250208-Canon EOS R6m2-006-Enhanced-NR.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2025 00:54:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R10-to-R7-or-R6-Mark-II/m-p/533397#M129550</guid>
      <dc:creator>TomRamsey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-09T00:54:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R10 to R7 or R6 Mark II</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R10-to-R7-or-R6-Mark-II/m-p/533483#M129577</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No real limitations. I like the reach I get with APS-C. Wondering if IBIS will make a remarkable difference combined with OIS.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2025 17:04:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R10-to-R7-or-R6-Mark-II/m-p/533483#M129577</guid>
      <dc:creator>TandemYards</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-09T17:04:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R10 to R7 or R6 Mark II</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R10-to-R7-or-R6-Mark-II/m-p/533491#M129579</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Lens Optical IS and IBIS work in tandem and provides more stabilization then optical IS alone. Or IBIS alone.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2025 17:24:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R10-to-R7-or-R6-Mark-II/m-p/533491#M129579</guid>
      <dc:creator>deebatman316</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-09T17:24:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R10 to R7 or R6 Mark II</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R10-to-R7-or-R6-Mark-II/m-p/533512#M129583</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2025 18:34:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R10-to-R7-or-R6-Mark-II/m-p/533512#M129583</guid>
      <dc:creator>TandemYards</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-09T18:34:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R10 to R7 or R6 Mark II</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R10-to-R7-or-R6-Mark-II/m-p/533514#M129584</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2025 18:34:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R10-to-R7-or-R6-Mark-II/m-p/533514#M129584</guid>
      <dc:creator>TandemYards</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-09T18:34:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

