<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic EOS R6 Mark II exposure simulation processing time in EOS DSLR &amp; Mirrorless Cameras</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/EOS-R6-Mark-II-exposure-simulation-processing-time/m-p/517201#M126439</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know if the R6 Mark ii's viewfinder exposu&lt;SPAN&gt;re simulation processing time is better than the R? I'm very frustrated with my Eos R's dysfunctionally slow searching around process for a useable EVF illumination. It's painfully slow compared to the camera's light metering. And I have to wait too long to clearly see and frame any subject in variable light.. say for example, lit concert stage photography, and basically any kind of shot that requires rapid point and shoot.. including war photography. It doesn't make any difference if I use a firmware uograded third party lens or a native Canon RF 24-240 zoom.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I tried getting an answer for this query through the Canon Australia community forum, but it won't let me see the E mail notified responses, due to some kind of glitch.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This is a serious issue for me. And I would appreciate some clarification from a Canon tech. as well.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 08 Dec 2024 13:11:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Droo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-12-08T13:11:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EOS R6 Mark II exposure simulation processing time</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/EOS-R6-Mark-II-exposure-simulation-processing-time/m-p/517201#M126439</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Does anyone know if the R6 Mark ii's viewfinder exposu&lt;SPAN&gt;re simulation processing time is better than the R? I'm very frustrated with my Eos R's dysfunctionally slow searching around process for a useable EVF illumination. It's painfully slow compared to the camera's light metering. And I have to wait too long to clearly see and frame any subject in variable light.. say for example, lit concert stage photography, and basically any kind of shot that requires rapid point and shoot.. including war photography. It doesn't make any difference if I use a firmware uograded third party lens or a native Canon RF 24-240 zoom.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I tried getting an answer for this query through the Canon Australia community forum, but it won't let me see the E mail notified responses, due to some kind of glitch.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This is a serious issue for me. And I would appreciate some clarification from a Canon tech. as well.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Dec 2024 13:11:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/EOS-R6-Mark-II-exposure-simulation-processing-time/m-p/517201#M126439</guid>
      <dc:creator>Droo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-08T13:11:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

