<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: R6 R8 image stabilization? in EOS DSLR &amp; Mirrorless Cameras</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/EOS-R8-Is-lack-of-in-body-image-stabilization-an-issue/m-p/514850#M125844</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;With in-body IS like the EOS R6/R6 Mk2 have then you get extra stabilisation effect as the in-body and lens IS systems work together. For video this can be quite a valuable advantage to have a camera with in-body IS.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The reality is that lens IS generally is better at stabilising angular movement, while in-body IS is better at stabilising shift movement where the camera is moved left/right or up/down. Also for longer lenses, in-lens stabilisation is generally better, while standard and wide-angle focal length lenses are better stabilised by in-body IS.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:10:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>p4pictures</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-11-25T17:10:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EOS R8 Is lack of in-body image stabilization an issue?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/EOS-R8-Is-lack-of-in-body-image-stabilization-an-issue/m-p/514839#M125838</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is the R8 lack of in body image stabilization really an issue if your using cannon lenses with image stabilization built in?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I plan on doing both stills and video to be used on social media&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:56:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/EOS-R8-Is-lack-of-in-body-image-stabilization-an-issue/m-p/514839#M125838</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mikechoate64</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-26T13:56:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R6 R8 image stabilization?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/EOS-R8-Is-lack-of-in-body-image-stabilization-an-issue/m-p/514850#M125844</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;With in-body IS like the EOS R6/R6 Mk2 have then you get extra stabilisation effect as the in-body and lens IS systems work together. For video this can be quite a valuable advantage to have a camera with in-body IS.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The reality is that lens IS generally is better at stabilising angular movement, while in-body IS is better at stabilising shift movement where the camera is moved left/right or up/down. Also for longer lenses, in-lens stabilisation is generally better, while standard and wide-angle focal length lenses are better stabilised by in-body IS.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:10:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/EOS-R8-Is-lack-of-in-body-image-stabilization-an-issue/m-p/514850#M125844</guid>
      <dc:creator>p4pictures</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-25T17:10:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R6 R8 image stabilization?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/EOS-R8-Is-lack-of-in-body-image-stabilization-an-issue/m-p/514855#M125847</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;While not scientific, Ken Rockwell shows how much improvement he gets when the IBIS and lens IS work in tandem:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://kenrockwell.com/canon/eos-r/lenses/24-240mm.htm" target="_blank"&gt;https://kenrockwell.com/canon/eos-r/lenses/24-240mm.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:22:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/EOS-R8-Is-lack-of-in-body-image-stabilization-an-issue/m-p/514855#M125847</guid>
      <dc:creator>kvbarkley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-25T17:22:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

