<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Interesting Videos Comparing the R5 and R5II in EOS DSLR &amp; Mirrorless Cameras</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Interesting-Videos-Comparing-the-R5-and-R5II/m-p/507065#M123936</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Fabian Fopp has produced a video that I thought was worthy of interest for those wondering about the upgrade between the two, and who are prepared to look at reviews by third parties.&amp;nbsp; I am not saying this is definitive, but it is an intriguing insight.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I do like his commenting on those who would want to stick with the R5 or move to the R5II and his conclusion seems more logical to me.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;div class="video-embed-center video-embed"&gt;&lt;iframe class="embedly-embed" src="https://cdn.embedly.com/widgets/media.html?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fembed%2FZaaoEx-QnKk%3Ffeature%3Doembed&amp;amp;display_name=YouTube&amp;amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DZaaoEx-QnKk&amp;amp;image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FZaaoEx-QnKk%2Fhqdefault.jpg&amp;amp;type=text%2Fhtml&amp;amp;schema=youtube" width="200" height="112" scrolling="no" title="Canon R5 II - Worse image quality and missing features?" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; fullscreen; encrypted-media; picture-in-picture;" allowfullscreen="true"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Duade Paton is a bird photographer from Oz.&amp;nbsp; Sometimes I disagree with his conclusions or methods, but he makes some good points and his video is a good comparison to Fabian's.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;div class="video-embed-center video-embed"&gt;&lt;iframe class="embedly-embed" src="https://cdn.embedly.com/widgets/media.html?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fembed%2FnGTxU2L9Jww%3Ffeature%3Doembed&amp;amp;display_name=YouTube&amp;amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DnGTxU2L9Jww&amp;amp;image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FnGTxU2L9Jww%2Fhqdefault.jpg&amp;amp;type=text%2Fhtml&amp;amp;schema=youtube" width="200" height="112" scrolling="no" title="Canon R5II Disappointment, I Did Not Expect This!" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; fullscreen; encrypted-media; picture-in-picture;" allowfullscreen="true"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I will note that much depends on what you shoot and under what condition.&amp;nbsp; For those who need high ISO and frame rates there may be some food for thought.&amp;nbsp; Here is the chart from the site Photons to Photos, where the relative positions of the R3, R6, R5, R5II and R7 tell a consistent story.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Tronhard_0-1729275460931.png" style="width: 551px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/59826iBA6F337CF3304DFC/image-dimensions/551x400?v=v2" width="551" height="400" role="button" title="Tronhard_0-1729275460931.png" alt="Tronhard_0-1729275460931.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;IMHO, these are both brilliant cameras but may have benefits for slightly different shooting situations.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I had realized that stacked sensors had lower ISO performance and DR for a while, and that is another reason why the R1 and R3 have a much smaller MP count that the R5 series. Apart from the need for smaller file sizes to record and transmit images in close to real time and publish on-line or to magazines, the larger photosites offering a lower density mean the photosites are larger and thus more efficient, and can cope with the loss of efficiency of the BSI/Stacked sensor: there is so much less data to manage for the processors. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If the rumors of the R6III having the same (or very similar) 24MP sensor to the R3 with many of the focusing features of the R5II, that would be a great compromise solution for those who don't need to the MP capacity of the R5 series.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 23:03:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tronhard</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-10-23T23:03:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Interesting Videos Comparing the R5 and R5II</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Interesting-Videos-Comparing-the-R5-and-R5II/m-p/507065#M123936</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Fabian Fopp has produced a video that I thought was worthy of interest for those wondering about the upgrade between the two, and who are prepared to look at reviews by third parties.&amp;nbsp; I am not saying this is definitive, but it is an intriguing insight.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I do like his commenting on those who would want to stick with the R5 or move to the R5II and his conclusion seems more logical to me.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;div class="video-embed-center video-embed"&gt;&lt;iframe class="embedly-embed" src="https://cdn.embedly.com/widgets/media.html?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fembed%2FZaaoEx-QnKk%3Ffeature%3Doembed&amp;amp;display_name=YouTube&amp;amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DZaaoEx-QnKk&amp;amp;image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FZaaoEx-QnKk%2Fhqdefault.jpg&amp;amp;type=text%2Fhtml&amp;amp;schema=youtube" width="200" height="112" scrolling="no" title="Canon R5 II - Worse image quality and missing features?" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; fullscreen; encrypted-media; picture-in-picture;" allowfullscreen="true"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Duade Paton is a bird photographer from Oz.&amp;nbsp; Sometimes I disagree with his conclusions or methods, but he makes some good points and his video is a good comparison to Fabian's.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;div class="video-embed-center video-embed"&gt;&lt;iframe class="embedly-embed" src="https://cdn.embedly.com/widgets/media.html?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fembed%2FnGTxU2L9Jww%3Ffeature%3Doembed&amp;amp;display_name=YouTube&amp;amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DnGTxU2L9Jww&amp;amp;image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ytimg.com%2Fvi%2FnGTxU2L9Jww%2Fhqdefault.jpg&amp;amp;type=text%2Fhtml&amp;amp;schema=youtube" width="200" height="112" scrolling="no" title="Canon R5II Disappointment, I Did Not Expect This!" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; fullscreen; encrypted-media; picture-in-picture;" allowfullscreen="true"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I will note that much depends on what you shoot and under what condition.&amp;nbsp; For those who need high ISO and frame rates there may be some food for thought.&amp;nbsp; Here is the chart from the site Photons to Photos, where the relative positions of the R3, R6, R5, R5II and R7 tell a consistent story.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Tronhard_0-1729275460931.png" style="width: 551px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/59826iBA6F337CF3304DFC/image-dimensions/551x400?v=v2" width="551" height="400" role="button" title="Tronhard_0-1729275460931.png" alt="Tronhard_0-1729275460931.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;IMHO, these are both brilliant cameras but may have benefits for slightly different shooting situations.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I had realized that stacked sensors had lower ISO performance and DR for a while, and that is another reason why the R1 and R3 have a much smaller MP count that the R5 series. Apart from the need for smaller file sizes to record and transmit images in close to real time and publish on-line or to magazines, the larger photosites offering a lower density mean the photosites are larger and thus more efficient, and can cope with the loss of efficiency of the BSI/Stacked sensor: there is so much less data to manage for the processors. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If the rumors of the R6III having the same (or very similar) 24MP sensor to the R3 with many of the focusing features of the R5II, that would be a great compromise solution for those who don't need to the MP capacity of the R5 series.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 23:03:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Interesting-Videos-Comparing-the-R5-and-R5II/m-p/507065#M123936</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tronhard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-23T23:03:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

