<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: R5 and RF 24-70 f2.8 IS USM chromatic aberration in RAW in EOS DSLR &amp; Mirrorless Cameras</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R5-and-RF-24-70-f2-8-IS-USM-chromatic-aberration-in-RAW/m-p/504355#M123173</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;What software are you using to process your RAW images?&lt;BR /&gt;There are actually two types of Chromatic Abberation: Lineal and Transverse.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;In digital sensors, axial CA results in the red and blue planes being defocused (assuming that the green plane is in focus), which is relatively difficult to remedy in post-processing, while transverse CA results in the red, green, and blue planes being at different magnifications.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It is important that your post-processing software had the correct lens correction algorithms.&amp;nbsp; Generally programs like Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom, will have these Transverse corrections available and usually do the corrections as the RAW images are loaded.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;In-camera lens corrections for Transverse Aberrations are done to JPGs only.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2024 02:02:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tronhard</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-10-04T02:02:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>R5 and RF 24-70 f2.8 IS USM chromatic aberration in RAW</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R5-and-RF-24-70-f2-8-IS-USM-chromatic-aberration-in-RAW/m-p/504336#M123167</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am experiencing significant CA distortion when taking landscape photos into the sun. With Digital Lens&amp;nbsp;Optimizer applied the income correction is only effective in JPEGS. RAW photos are not corrected. Is this the expected outcome?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Canon setup: R5, RF24-70 IS USM, POLARIZER.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="NSphotographer_0-1727994163217.jpeg" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/59313i5B826171F9F471DB/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="NSphotographer_0-1727994163217.jpeg" alt="NSphotographer_0-1727994163217.jpeg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="NSphotographer_2-1727994284618.jpeg" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/59315iA3C8BDAA96B25B16/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="NSphotographer_2-1727994284618.jpeg" alt="NSphotographer_2-1727994284618.jpeg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="NSphotographer_3-1727994352699.jpeg" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/59316iAF3CAA0966A91891/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="NSphotographer_3-1727994352699.jpeg" alt="NSphotographer_3-1727994352699.jpeg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ISO 50, 70mm, f6.3, 1/100s RAW, 42.6MB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2024 22:31:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R5-and-RF-24-70-f2-8-IS-USM-chromatic-aberration-in-RAW/m-p/504336#M123167</guid>
      <dc:creator>NSphotographer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-03T22:31:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R5 and RF 24-70 f2.8 IS USM chromatic aberration in RAW</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R5-and-RF-24-70-f2-8-IS-USM-chromatic-aberration-in-RAW/m-p/504346#M123171</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Greetings,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please start by reviewing this KB article.&amp;nbsp; According to this article, CA cannot be corrected on JPGs, only RAW.&amp;nbsp; Are you certain you have the lens profile downloaded for the lens?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://support.usa.canon.com/kb/s/article/ART162839" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Using the Digital Lens Optimizer in Digital Photo Professional Ver.4.x (canon.com)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2024 00:05:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R5-and-RF-24-70-f2-8-IS-USM-chromatic-aberration-in-RAW/m-p/504346#M123171</guid>
      <dc:creator>shadowsports</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-04T00:05:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R5 and RF 24-70 f2.8 IS USM chromatic aberration in RAW</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R5-and-RF-24-70-f2-8-IS-USM-chromatic-aberration-in-RAW/m-p/504355#M123173</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What software are you using to process your RAW images?&lt;BR /&gt;There are actually two types of Chromatic Abberation: Lineal and Transverse.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;In digital sensors, axial CA results in the red and blue planes being defocused (assuming that the green plane is in focus), which is relatively difficult to remedy in post-processing, while transverse CA results in the red, green, and blue planes being at different magnifications.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It is important that your post-processing software had the correct lens correction algorithms.&amp;nbsp; Generally programs like Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom, will have these Transverse corrections available and usually do the corrections as the RAW images are loaded.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;In-camera lens corrections for Transverse Aberrations are done to JPGs only.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2024 02:02:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R5-and-RF-24-70-f2-8-IS-USM-chromatic-aberration-in-RAW/m-p/504355#M123173</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tronhard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-04T02:02:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R5 and RF 24-70 f2.8 IS USM chromatic aberration in RAW</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R5-and-RF-24-70-f2-8-IS-USM-chromatic-aberration-in-RAW/m-p/504385#M123177</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The part seems to be in clipped highlights.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Digital photography introduced some new types of color fringes, that are not lens chromatic aberration. They are frequently confused with TCA and unfortunately they occur often mixed with TCA. These effects might be visible as purple or blue fringes and are visible around overexposed areas in most cases.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://hugin.sourceforge.io/docs/manual/Chromatic_aberration.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://hugin.sourceforge.io/docs/manual/Chromatic_aberration.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The part of the boat that is not in the clipped area has TCA that is easy to correct.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2024 08:01:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R5-and-RF-24-70-f2-8-IS-USM-chromatic-aberration-in-RAW/m-p/504385#M123177</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-04T08:01:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R5 and RF 24-70 f2.8 IS USM chromatic aberration in RAW</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R5-and-RF-24-70-f2-8-IS-USM-chromatic-aberration-in-RAW/m-p/505225#M123468</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good article. I'm not sure I totally understand what CA and DLO are--but I do have them enabled in my camera.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I downloaded the lens data and played with the sliders. Honestly, I can't tell any difference.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I see Lightroom Classic has my lens annotated in the Lens Correction panel, I guess it auto loads the lens data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2024 16:40:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R5-and-RF-24-70-f2-8-IS-USM-chromatic-aberration-in-RAW/m-p/505225#M123468</guid>
      <dc:creator>Zhaopian</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-08T16:40:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

