<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Alternative setup to EOS R5 for light weight travel in EOS DSLR &amp; Mirrorless Cameras</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Alternative-setup-to-EOS-R5-for-light-weight-travel/m-p/496022#M121046</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It seems to me that the weight of the camera body wouldn't be a problem but the weight of any lens would be a factor. Would there be any significant weight difference between the two camera? Any way to carry extra lenses? BTW, how about posting some photos in the future? Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My wife found a vest on sale at Bass Pro. I carry an extra battery, and at least one or two lenses. Some of the bigger lenses won't fit the pockets.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:11:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tintype_18</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-08-26T13:11:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Alternative setup to EOS R5 for light weight travel</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Alternative-setup-to-EOS-R5-for-light-weight-travel/m-p/495996#M121045</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a Canon R5 with RF 14-35 f4 and RF 70-200mm f4 that I primarily use for landscape photography. The setup on tripod works great and the IQ is fabulous.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However I also travel with my family quite a bit and while the above setup does the job, it is a lot of lug around while roaming around cities etc. To that end I have been considering getting a second body as a travel kit that I could use for such trips.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would the Canon R8 be significantly lighter than the R5? Would you feel the difference? I could then just carry a couple of primes and be done with like the 16mm and the 35mm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The other options I was considering was the Fuji XT30 with similar primes (considerably lighter and lower weight) or even the Sony a7rc as a travel setup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any suggestions or recommendations?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2024 12:23:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Alternative-setup-to-EOS-R5-for-light-weight-travel/m-p/495996#M121045</guid>
      <dc:creator>jonal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-26T12:23:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Alternative setup to EOS R5 for light weight travel</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Alternative-setup-to-EOS-R5-for-light-weight-travel/m-p/496022#M121046</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It seems to me that the weight of the camera body wouldn't be a problem but the weight of any lens would be a factor. Would there be any significant weight difference between the two camera? Any way to carry extra lenses? BTW, how about posting some photos in the future? Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My wife found a vest on sale at Bass Pro. I carry an extra battery, and at least one or two lenses. Some of the bigger lenses won't fit the pockets.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:11:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/Alternative-setup-to-EOS-R5-for-light-weight-travel/m-p/496022#M121046</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tintype_18</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-26T13:11:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

