<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic R50 vs R100 as a webcam in EOS DSLR &amp; Mirrorless Cameras</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R50-vs-R100-as-a-webcam/m-p/484673#M117912</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Currently using a Canon SL2 with a EFS 10-18mm Lens as a webcam for Youtube and Twitch streaming, looking to upgrade, and keep using my lens if possible with an adapter. My question is for only using it as a webcam essentially is it worth the extra money for the R50 or would the 100 be fine&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="" href="https://mobdro.bio/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://mobdro.bio/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2024 09:10:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jofrapa</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-06-30T09:10:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>R50 vs R100 as a webcam</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R50-vs-R100-as-a-webcam/m-p/484673#M117912</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Currently using a Canon SL2 with a EFS 10-18mm Lens as a webcam for Youtube and Twitch streaming, looking to upgrade, and keep using my lens if possible with an adapter. My question is for only using it as a webcam essentially is it worth the extra money for the R50 or would the 100 be fine&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="" href="https://mobdro.bio/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://mobdro.bio/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2024 09:10:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R50-vs-R100-as-a-webcam/m-p/484673#M117912</guid>
      <dc:creator>jofrapa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-30T09:10:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: R50 vs R100 as a webcam</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R50-vs-R100-as-a-webcam/m-p/484682#M117913</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Both EOS R100 and EOS R50 will output clean HDMI so if you feed in to a capture device to stream then both will be better than your SL2 as they can be set to AF and face track with clean output.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The EOS R50 also has the ability to be setup so that it will stream direct to your computer form the USB-C port as it has the UAC/UVC ability that makes he camera look like a webcam without using a capture card or device. EOS &amp;nbsp;R50 also has a special video demonstration mode, that makes the camera follow a person until that person holds some item up close to the camera then it will switch to the closer item being demonstrated / displayed.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Personally I'd suggest the EOS R50, but ultimately you make the choice.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2024 10:39:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EOS-DSLR-Mirrorless-Cameras/R50-vs-R100-as-a-webcam/m-p/484682#M117913</guid>
      <dc:creator>p4pictures</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-06-28T10:39:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

