<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 70-200 f/4 L Lens in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/70-200-f-4-L-Lens/m-p/102548#M8680</link>
    <description>Like Campbell said, it's normal. Advertising photos tend to make things whiter to look more attractive. It's a great lens. I love it.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 16:54:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>hsbn</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-07-03T16:54:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>70-200 f/4 L Lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/70-200-f-4-L-Lens/m-p/102466#M8678</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I just purchased the 70-200 f/4 L series non-IS lens and instead of being pure white it is more greyish/tanish color. Is this normal. Most images I see have it as pure white. I purchased it from Best Buy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 03:25:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/70-200-f-4-L-Lens/m-p/102466#M8678</guid>
      <dc:creator>AllNoAll</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-03T03:25:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 70-200 f/4 L Lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/70-200-f-4-L-Lens/m-p/102478#M8679</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, the "white" lenses are actually slightly off-white with a bit of a grayish "putty" like color.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 03:56:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/70-200-f-4-L-Lens/m-p/102478#M8679</guid>
      <dc:creator>TCampbell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-03T03:56:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 70-200 f/4 L Lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/70-200-f-4-L-Lens/m-p/102548#M8680</link>
      <description>Like Campbell said, it's normal. Advertising photos tend to make things whiter to look more attractive. It's a great lens. I love it.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 16:54:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/70-200-f-4-L-Lens/m-p/102548#M8680</guid>
      <dc:creator>hsbn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-03T16:54:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 70-200 f/4 L Lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/70-200-f-4-L-Lens/m-p/102550#M8681</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/10239"&gt;@hsbn&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Like Campbell said, it's normal. Advertising photos tend to make things whiter to look more attractive. It's a great lens.&lt;SPAN style="color: #ff0000;"&gt; I love it.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000;"&gt;Really? Deep and enduring affection?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 16:59:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/70-200-f-4-L-Lens/m-p/102550#M8681</guid>
      <dc:creator>cale_kat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-03T16:59:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 70-200 f/4 L Lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/70-200-f-4-L-Lens/m-p/102554#M8682</link>
      <description>You bet. It is my first L lens. Bought it in 2000 for less than $400 (it was a deal on Dell). I used it so much that the rubber for the focus/zoom had turn white. But I got some of those silicon cloth (to clean guns) to clean it, and now it's sparkling new. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 17:21:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/70-200-f-4-L-Lens/m-p/102554#M8682</guid>
      <dc:creator>hsbn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-03T17:21:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 70-200 f/4 L Lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/70-200-f-4-L-Lens/m-p/102558#M8683</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/10239"&gt;@hsbn&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;You bet. It is my first L lens. Bought it in 2000 for less than $400 (it was a deal on Dell). I used it so much that the rubber for the focus/zoom had turn white. But I got some of those silicon cloth (to clean guns) to clean it, and now it's sparkling new. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;yea!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2014 17:28:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/70-200-f-4-L-Lens/m-p/102558#M8683</guid>
      <dc:creator>cale_kat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-03T17:28:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 70-200 f/4 L Lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/70-200-f-4-L-Lens/m-p/102652#M8684</link>
      <description>&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000;"&gt;It is a very good lens. &amp;nbsp;Well worth the money. &amp;nbsp;You will love it too.&lt;/SPAN&gt; Ignore the sarcasm here.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 14:53:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/70-200-f-4-L-Lens/m-p/102652#M8684</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-04T14:53:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 70-200 f/4 L Lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/70-200-f-4-L-Lens/m-p/102666#M8685</link>
      <description>I wasn't being sarcastic, I was trying to be funny!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SORRY</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 15:24:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/70-200-f-4-L-Lens/m-p/102666#M8685</guid>
      <dc:creator>cale_kat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-04T15:24:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

