<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 400mm compare in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/400mm-compare/m-p/186750#M7287</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Not sure if the slightly different framing is throwing me, but I do believe the 400 F/5.6 wins.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 19:43:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ScottyP</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-09-30T19:43:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>400mm compare</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/400mm-compare/m-p/186741#M7286</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This little test is not scientific it is simply what a real world person can expect with these choices. All hane held at approx. 20 feet with my 1D Mk II n. &amp;nbsp;That's right Mk II n. &amp;nbsp;Not everybody has a 20 or 30 mp camera! &amp;nbsp;I know the big Siggy S is not the best candidate for hand holdong but I find myself doing it most of the time. &amp;nbsp;All shots got lens correction in LR. &amp;nbsp;So here goes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10785iD33BE1CCAB92B88E/image-size/original?v=v2&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="_K2N6750-Edit-Edit.jpg" title="_K2N6750-Edit-Edit.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fantastic lens and it is a unique lens as nobody makes a competitor to it. Cost vs performance. &amp;nbsp;This not only a best buy but it is a buy now lens. &amp;nbsp;The replacement&amp;nbsp;is likely going to has IS and a price tag to go with it. &amp;nbsp;Get one now. I had one and sold it for the ef 100-400. &amp;nbsp;Yes a mistake but for my purpose the zoom work&amp;nbsp;well. &amp;nbsp;SInce, however, I have purchased another ef 400mm f5.6L. &amp;nbsp;It will not get sold!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Below is the ef 30mm f4L IS just as a possible second choice if you just have to have IS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10787i547757791A3A5D63/image-size/original?v=v2&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="_K2N6754-Edit-Edit.jpg" title="_K2N6754-Edit-Edit.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Same ef 300mm with the 1.4x extender yeilding 420mm f5.6 with IS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10786i648E8B689BBAAB72/image-size/original?v=v2&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="_K2N6751-Edit-Edit.jpg" title="_K2N6751-Edit-Edit.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now the big guy. The&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Sigma&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN&gt;150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sports Lens for Canon set to 400mm. &amp;nbsp;Actually the 400mm mark on the lens turned out to be 410mm that was reported to the Mk II n.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10788i0E5C8636F7E655DF/image-size/original?v=v2&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="_K2N6756-Edit-Edit.jpg" title="_K2N6756-Edit-Edit.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;OK, wnat 100% crops?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10789i7B4423F28AA35C7D/image-size/original?v=v2&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="combo.jpg" title="combo.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Remember this is really just snap shots of what these lenses provide and what you can expect. &amp;nbsp;Using them as you actually would.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 15:58:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/400mm-compare/m-p/186741#M7286</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-30T15:58:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 400mm compare</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/400mm-compare/m-p/186750#M7287</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not sure if the slightly different framing is throwing me, but I do believe the 400 F/5.6 wins.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 19:43:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/400mm-compare/m-p/186750#M7287</guid>
      <dc:creator>ScottyP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-30T19:43:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 400mm compare</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/400mm-compare/m-p/186751#M7288</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"I do believe the 400 F/5.6 wins."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It is close for sure and the bang for the buck it is the winner. &amp;nbsp;Upon close examination though, I believe the big Siggy has a slight edge. I do have the advantage of an unaltered web file to view, though.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The slightly different framing is do to the fact of differing focal lengthe. 400mm and 300mm for the Canons. 420mm for the 300 with the converter. &amp;nbsp;And the Siggy said 400mm on the zoom ring but the camera reported it as 410mm.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It is, however, exactly what you can expect.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 19:56:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/400mm-compare/m-p/186751#M7288</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-30T19:56:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

