<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Best Canon lens for under $800 that have image stabilization in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Best-Canon-lens-for-under-800-that-have-image-stabilization/m-p/179204#M6514</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Here's a highly related lens with IS:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-S-17-55mm-f-2.8-IS-USM-Lens-Review.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-S-17-55mm-f-2.8-IS-USM-Lens-Review.aspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:34:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jrhoffman75</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-07-13T20:34:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Best Canon lens for under $800 that have image stabilization</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Best-Canon-lens-for-under-800-that-have-image-stabilization/m-p/179195#M6512</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a Canon EOS 70D and am looking for a specific type of lens. The&amp;nbsp;Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art Lens for Canon is the exact type of lens I want, but it has no image stabilization! I do lots of video and find that footage is shaky without stabilization. Do you have any recommendations, or do you think the&amp;nbsp;Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art Lens for Canon would be okay even without DS?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2016 18:40:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Best-Canon-lens-for-under-800-that-have-image-stabilization/m-p/179195#M6512</guid>
      <dc:creator>quick9</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-13T18:40:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best Canon lens for under $800 that have image stabilization</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Best-Canon-lens-for-under-800-that-have-image-stabilization/m-p/179201#M6513</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you shoot lots of video, you really would be better off with an actual video camera/recorder.&amp;nbsp; There are limits to do what you can do with a DSLR.&amp;nbsp; First and foremost among the limits is the issue of the image sensor overheating, and shutting down the camera until it sufficiently cools.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DSLRs mostly use CMOS sensors, which are best for high resolution in short bursts, like taking stills.&amp;nbsp; CMOS sensors can overheat quickly with extended use, like when shooting video.&amp;nbsp; Camcorders frequently use CCD sensors, which do NOT have as high of a resolution, but can withstand extended use without overheating, like when shooting video.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Back to your question:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have not used that Sigma lens, so I cannot speak about it's image quality.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If one were shooting stills with that Sigma lens, I would not think image stabilization would be particularly missed under most circumstances.&amp;nbsp; The lens is pretty fast, f/1.8, so you can use faster shutter speeds.&amp;nbsp; I shoot stills with a Canon EF 16-35 f/2.8L IS II USM, which lacks Image Stabilization, and I really don't miss it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perhaps what you really need is a camera stabilizer, not a lens with image stabilization.&amp;nbsp; A stabilizer would work with your entire arsenal of lenses, and would only help to augment whatever lenses you own that do include IS.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2016 23:31:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Best-Canon-lens-for-under-800-that-have-image-stabilization/m-p/179201#M6513</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-13T23:31:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best Canon lens for under $800 that have image stabilization</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Best-Canon-lens-for-under-800-that-have-image-stabilization/m-p/179204#M6514</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Here's a highly related lens with IS:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-S-17-55mm-f-2.8-IS-USM-Lens-Review.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-EF-S-17-55mm-f-2.8-IS-USM-Lens-Review.aspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:34:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Best-Canon-lens-for-under-800-that-have-image-stabilization/m-p/179204#M6514</guid>
      <dc:creator>jrhoffman75</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-13T20:34:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best Canon lens for under $800 that have image stabilization</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Best-Canon-lens-for-under-800-that-have-image-stabilization/m-p/179218#M6515</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is the lens for you&amp;nbsp;Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens, &amp;nbsp;But like advised above the 70D isn't. &amp;nbsp;It is not a video camera. &amp;nbsp;It will never be one. &amp;nbsp;If video is your main most thing check into a real deal video camera.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2016 22:47:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Best-Canon-lens-for-under-800-that-have-image-stabilization/m-p/179218#M6515</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-13T22:47:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

