<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Confusion about this lense in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Confusion-about-this-lense/m-p/256922#M6452</link>
    <description>I just recently bought Tamron 60mm f/2 Di II LD IF Macro 1:1 SP AF lense. The website i bought it from states that it is an EF/s lense, but the lense itself has a red dot (as if it is an EF lense). I plan on upgrading my camera in not so long to a camera to a 6D mkii or something similar which only takes EF lenses. So I'm considering sending this lense back for a refund.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is it EF or EF/s?</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:18:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jmark</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-10-15T12:18:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Confusion about this lense</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Confusion-about-this-lense/m-p/256922#M6452</link>
      <description>I just recently bought Tamron 60mm f/2 Di II LD IF Macro 1:1 SP AF lense. The website i bought it from states that it is an EF/s lense, but the lense itself has a red dot (as if it is an EF lense). I plan on upgrading my camera in not so long to a camera to a 6D mkii or something similar which only takes EF lenses. So I'm considering sending this lense back for a refund.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is it EF or EF/s?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:18:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Confusion-about-this-lense/m-p/256922#M6452</guid>
      <dc:creator>jmark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-15T12:18:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Confusion about this lense</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Confusion-about-this-lense/m-p/256924#M6453</link>
      <description>Contact Tamron or the retailer.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:22:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Confusion-about-this-lense/m-p/256924#M6453</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-15T12:22:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Confusion about this lense</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Confusion-about-this-lense/m-p/256928#M6454</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The docs say it is for "APS-C", but if I was Tamron, I would always use an EF mount, even for lenses optimised for APS-C. Why reverse engineer *two* mounts, when one will suffice?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 12:47:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Confusion-about-this-lense/m-p/256928#M6454</guid>
      <dc:creator>kvbarkley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-15T12:47:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Confusion about this lense</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Confusion-about-this-lense/m-p/256934#M6455</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/74913"&gt;@kvbarkley&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;The docs say it is for "APS-C", but if I was Tamron, I would always use an EF mount, even for lenses optimised for APS-C. Why reverse engineer *two* mounts, when one will suffice?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Because a lens optimized for APS-C will be too close to the focal plane of&amp;nbsp; a FF camera and may interfere with the mirror. Also, if the image doesn't fill the frame, the buyer will gripe.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 14:02:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Confusion-about-this-lense/m-p/256934#M6455</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertTheFat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-15T14:02:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Confusion about this lense</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Confusion-about-this-lense/m-p/256935#M6456</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If the lens is model&amp;nbsp; #G005E, its APS-C.&amp;nbsp; Not a bad lens if you plan to stay with an&amp;nbsp; APS-C body.&amp;nbsp; Not a good choice for FF at 96mm (equivlent).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you want macro, the Canon 100mm Macro is a better choice for FF (EF) &amp;nbsp;mount.&amp;nbsp; More costly, but a better lens system match for a FF body.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 14:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Confusion-about-this-lense/m-p/256935#M6456</guid>
      <dc:creator>shadowsports</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-15T14:07:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Confusion about this lense</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Confusion-about-this-lense/m-p/256939#M6457</link>
      <description>That's what I thought. Then why does it have a red dot?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 14:46:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Confusion-about-this-lense/m-p/256939#M6457</guid>
      <dc:creator>jmark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-15T14:46:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Confusion about this lense</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Confusion-about-this-lense/m-p/256941#M6458</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"Then why does it have a red dot?"&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The correct and full name of the lens in question is&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Tamron&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;SP 60mm f/2 Di II 1:1 Macro &lt;STRONG&gt;Lens for&lt;U&gt; Canon EF.&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Although the lens is designed&amp;nbsp;for a crop body it has an EF mount and can be used on a FF body.&amp;nbsp; I, personally, have never used this lens so I can not say how well it will&amp;nbsp;work on a FF but I suspect it will be less than fantastic. Maybe it is fantastic?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;IMHO, the lens you want&amp;nbsp;and it is nearly the same price&amp;nbsp;is the&amp;nbsp;Canon&amp;nbsp;EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Lens. Both lenses are in the same level of good intermediate quality but the nod goes to the Canon.&amp;nbsp; Rule of thumb, don't buy 3rd world if Canon has the same or nearly the same lens.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:08:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Confusion-about-this-lense/m-p/256941#M6458</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-15T15:08:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Confusion about this lense</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Confusion-about-this-lense/m-p/256947#M6459</link>
      <description>Ah okay. Thanks for the tip! I'm pretty new to all this. Right, back to the store it goes then &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":smiling_face_with_smiling_eyes:"&gt;😊&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:24:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Confusion-about-this-lense/m-p/256947#M6459</guid>
      <dc:creator>jmark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-15T15:24:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Confusion about this lense</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Confusion-about-this-lense/m-p/256948#M6460</link>
      <description>I'll also add, that on my Canon 200D it takes lovely photos, but since I wouldn't mind upgrading the body within the next year, I think I'll spend a little more on a Camera macro lense.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:25:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Confusion-about-this-lense/m-p/256948#M6460</guid>
      <dc:creator>jmark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-15T15:25:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Confusion about this lense</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Confusion-about-this-lense/m-p/256949#M6461</link>
      <description>*canon</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:26:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Confusion-about-this-lense/m-p/256949#M6461</guid>
      <dc:creator>jmark</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-15T15:26:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Confusion about this lense</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Confusion-about-this-lense/m-p/256950#M6462</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;"&lt;SPAN&gt;*canon"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://community.usa.canon.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&amp;nbsp; Got it!&amp;nbsp; Stick with Canon as much as you can.&amp;nbsp; Life will be better.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2018 15:28:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Confusion-about-this-lense/m-p/256950#M6462</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-15T15:28:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

