<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 24mm f/2.8 STM a good candidate to replace 18-55 kit lens? in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/24mm-f-2-8-STM-a-good-candidate-to-replace-18-55-kit-lens/m-p/253070#M5940</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This is really a personal decision and you will get as many answers as there are photographers. I personally think that 38mm (35mm FOV equiv for 24mm APS-C)) is a bit narrow for landscape.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 16:55:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kvbarkley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-08-21T16:55:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>24mm f/2.8 STM a good candidate to replace 18-55 kit lens?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/24mm-f-2-8-STM-a-good-candidate-to-replace-18-55-kit-lens/m-p/253063#M5939</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was wondering if the 24mm f/2.8 STM is a good replacement for my 18-55 kit lens for landscape/nature type of photography.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was considering the 17-55 f2.8 IS USM lens, but it is very bulky and pricey for what it is even used around $500.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Factors about why I might buy the 24mm STM lens:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Sharper than the kit lens unsurprisingly&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Fast f/2.8 aperture&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. Fixed FL lenses force me to be more creative composition-wise. I don't mind moving forwards and backwards to get the same framing.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. Compact/Lightweight&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4. Metal Mount&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Question I have about the 24mm STM:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Is losing the 18-23mm range a big deal for landscape work? I am not concerned about losing the 25-55mm range because my 50mm f/1.8 STM pretty much covers the range well enough for most things (soon to be replaced by the 60mm f/2.8 USM macro).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Feel free to leave your opinions down below.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 16:14:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/24mm-f-2-8-STM-a-good-candidate-to-replace-18-55-kit-lens/m-p/253063#M5939</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndyMilnePhotog</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-21T16:14:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 24mm f/2.8 STM a good candidate to replace 18-55 kit lens?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/24mm-f-2-8-STM-a-good-candidate-to-replace-18-55-kit-lens/m-p/253070#M5940</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is really a personal decision and you will get as many answers as there are photographers. I personally think that 38mm (35mm FOV equiv for 24mm APS-C)) is a bit narrow for landscape.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 16:55:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/24mm-f-2-8-STM-a-good-candidate-to-replace-18-55-kit-lens/m-p/253070#M5940</guid>
      <dc:creator>kvbarkley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-21T16:55:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 24mm f/2.8 STM a good candidate to replace 18-55 kit lens?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/24mm-f-2-8-STM-a-good-candidate-to-replace-18-55-kit-lens/m-p/253071#M5941</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;First Andrew, I can't say enough good about the&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Canon&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens.&amp;nbsp; If you can't have the best in the world Canon&amp;nbsp;EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM Lens, you want the EF-S 17-55mm&amp;nbsp;f/2.8 IS&amp;nbsp;USM&amp;nbsp;Lens. . The&amp;nbsp;EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens is an outstanding lens that gets you&amp;nbsp;that constant fast f2.8 aperture.&amp;nbsp; Great IQ maybe not quite as good as a prime but certainly very good.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If money is tight is it a good idea to settle&amp;nbsp;on a lesser lens?&amp;nbsp; You know it isn't don't you?&amp;nbsp; You are doing fine with what you have so save a bit longer for the real prize,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;Canon&amp;nbsp;EF-S 17-55mm&amp;nbsp;f/2.8 IS&amp;nbsp;USM&amp;nbsp;Lens. Then sell your lens, you will never use it again.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;24mm on a cropper is nearly a normal AOV. Set you current lens to 24mm and use it for a day. Don't change or zoom it at all. Is it working for you?&amp;nbsp; That will tell you a lot.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 16:56:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/24mm-f-2-8-STM-a-good-candidate-to-replace-18-55-kit-lens/m-p/253071#M5941</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-21T16:56:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 24mm f/2.8 STM a good candidate to replace 18-55 kit lens?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/24mm-f-2-8-STM-a-good-candidate-to-replace-18-55-kit-lens/m-p/253074#M5942</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3485"&gt;@ebiggs1&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;First Andrew, I can't say enough good about the&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Canon&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens.&amp;nbsp; If you can't have the best in the world Canon&amp;nbsp;EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM Lens, you want the EF-S 17-55mm&amp;nbsp;f/2.8 IS&amp;nbsp;USM&amp;nbsp;Lens. . The&amp;nbsp;EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens is an outstanding lens that gets you&amp;nbsp;that constant fast f2.8 aperture.&amp;nbsp; Great IQ maybe not quite as good as a prime but certainly very good.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If money is tight is it a good idea to settle&amp;nbsp;on a lesser lens?&amp;nbsp; You know it isn't don't you?&amp;nbsp; You are doing fine with what you have so save a bit longer for the real prize,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;Canon&amp;nbsp;EF-S 17-55mm&amp;nbsp;f/2.8 IS&amp;nbsp;USM&amp;nbsp;Lens. Then sell your lens, you will never use it again.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;24mm on a cropper is nearly a normal AOV. Set you current lens to 24mm and use it for a day. Don't change or zoom it at all. Is it working for you?&amp;nbsp; That will tell you a lot.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was considering to get the 10-18mm IS STM &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;with the pancake lens. However, I was thinking later on: Is it more convenient to change one of the two lenses to get the shot I want or would I want the same range as the kit lens only with a wider f/2.8 aperture w/ IS? I would get the latter.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also realised that the cost of the 10-18mm IS STM &amp;amp; the pancake lens combined would only be $100-150 less than a used 17-55mm f2.8 IS lens.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For now, I'll still use my 18-55 kit lens until then.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again Ernie for helping me out. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 17:34:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/24mm-f-2-8-STM-a-good-candidate-to-replace-18-55-kit-lens/m-p/253074#M5942</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndyMilnePhotog</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-21T17:34:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 a good candidate to replace 18-55 kit lens?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/24mm-f-2-8-STM-a-good-candidate-to-replace-18-55-kit-lens/m-p/253086#M5943</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Wait a minute, screw the 24mm f/2.8 STM.&amp;nbsp;&lt;img id="smileytongue" class="emoticon emoticon-smileytongue" src="https://community.usa.canon.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-tongue.png" alt="Smiley Tongue" title="Smiley Tongue" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I found possibly a better lens that may be in my future, the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How does it compare with the Canon 17-55 f/2.8 performance-wise?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I heard it is sharper than the Canon 17-55 f/2.8. They're similarly priced, I think used ($500-$600) or new ($800).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 19:32:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/24mm-f-2-8-STM-a-good-candidate-to-replace-18-55-kit-lens/m-p/253086#M5943</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndyMilnePhotog</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-21T19:32:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 a good candidate to replace 18-55 kit lens?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/24mm-f-2-8-STM-a-good-candidate-to-replace-18-55-kit-lens/m-p/253103#M5944</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"I&amp;nbsp;found possibly a better lens that may be in my future, the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I love this lens.&amp;nbsp;Sigma&amp;nbsp;18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art Lens for Canon It may be the best lens there is in the range category.&amp;nbsp; I almost bought a T7i just so I could use the&amp;nbsp;Sigma&amp;nbsp;18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art Lens for Canon.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 21:27:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/24mm-f-2-8-STM-a-good-candidate-to-replace-18-55-kit-lens/m-p/253103#M5944</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-21T21:27:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Good candidates to replace and/or add to 18-55 kit lens?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/24mm-f-2-8-STM-a-good-candidate-to-replace-18-55-kit-lens/m-p/253261#M5945</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;"I&amp;nbsp;found possibly a better lens that may be in my future, the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Update: While it is a great &amp;amp; well built lens, some people said that the Sigma 18-35 f1.8 backfocuses or frontfocuses &amp;amp; that the autofocus is more inconsistent than a first- party Canon 17-55 f/2.8 IS. I know there is a USB dock for Sigma that may fix these issues but idk about their reliabilty.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One more question, Ernie. Since you said I am fine with what I have (18-55mm kit lens),&amp;nbsp;should I get the 10-18mm for the ultrawide fov &amp;amp; keep my kit lens or do I still go for your original recommendations&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;selling my kit lens and buy the 17-55 f2.8 IS/18-35 f1.8? It doesn't matter really. I shoot landscapes more than portraits.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 13:56:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/24mm-f-2-8-STM-a-good-candidate-to-replace-18-55-kit-lens/m-p/253261#M5945</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndyMilnePhotog</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-23T13:56:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Good candidates to replace and/or add to 18-55 kit lens?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/24mm-f-2-8-STM-a-good-candidate-to-replace-18-55-kit-lens/m-p/253287#M5946</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Well you know you have to make that decision I can't make it for you.&amp;nbsp; If it were me I suppose getting the&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM Lens would add a new dimension&amp;nbsp;to what you already have. I think I would go that route.&amp;nbsp; I think maybe waiting to upgrade a lens you already have might&amp;nbsp;be more interesting to you.&amp;nbsp; After all it is working for you.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;You decide!&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://community.usa.canon.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 16:19:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/24mm-f-2-8-STM-a-good-candidate-to-replace-18-55-kit-lens/m-p/253287#M5946</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-23T16:19:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Good candidates to replace and/or add to 18-55 kit lens?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/24mm-f-2-8-STM-a-good-candidate-to-replace-18-55-kit-lens/m-p/253289#M5947</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3485"&gt;@ebiggs1&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well you know you have to make that decision I can't make it for you.&amp;nbsp; If it were me I suppose getting the&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM Lens would add a new dimension&amp;nbsp;to what you already have. I think I would go that route.&amp;nbsp; I think maybe waiting to upgrade a lens you already have might&amp;nbsp;be more interesting to you.&amp;nbsp; After all it is working for you.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;You decide!&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://community.usa.canon.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;As Mario would say, "okey dokey!"&amp;nbsp;&lt;img id="smileyvery-happy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyvery-happy" src="https://community.usa.canon.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-very-happy.png" alt="Smiley Very Happy" title="Smiley Very Happy" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 16:30:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/24mm-f-2-8-STM-a-good-candidate-to-replace-18-55-kit-lens/m-p/253289#M5947</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndyMilnePhotog</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-23T16:30:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

