<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Recycling decent older SLR lenses in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Recycling-decent-older-SLR-lenses/m-p/246521#M5555</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It's obvious the world must be 'full of' old decent lenses made in SLR days.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Those that cost a mint.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are they being recycled?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it too much to expect they should be able to be returned and remade to modern digital format cameras.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know it is possible (I do) to put them on modern digitals, but how much better would they be if they were reassembled in a modern body with correct fittings etc.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I expect some may say it's not possible or not worth it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My creative mind doesn't take too easily to quick 'can't be done' though.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are told the cost is in the glass, re expensive 'super lenses'.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm open to hear how others view this.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2018 03:46:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Avondale87</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-06-26T03:46:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Recycling decent older SLR lenses</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Recycling-decent-older-SLR-lenses/m-p/246521#M5555</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It's obvious the world must be 'full of' old decent lenses made in SLR days.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Those that cost a mint.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are they being recycled?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it too much to expect they should be able to be returned and remade to modern digital format cameras.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know it is possible (I do) to put them on modern digitals, but how much better would they be if they were reassembled in a modern body with correct fittings etc.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I expect some may say it's not possible or not worth it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My creative mind doesn't take too easily to quick 'can't be done' though.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are told the cost is in the glass, re expensive 'super lenses'.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm open to hear how others view this.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2018 03:46:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Recycling-decent-older-SLR-lenses/m-p/246521#M5555</guid>
      <dc:creator>Avondale87</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-26T03:46:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recycling decent older SLR lenses</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Recycling-decent-older-SLR-lenses/m-p/246522#M5556</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"I expect some may say it's not possible or not worth it."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This may not be the definition&amp;nbsp;of impossible but it is a very good one.&amp;nbsp; However, some of them do make good coffee mugs!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2018 05:04:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Recycling-decent-older-SLR-lenses/m-p/246522#M5556</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-26T05:04:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recycling decent older SLR lenses</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Recycling-decent-older-SLR-lenses/m-p/246523#M5557</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I will add another thought I just had.&amp;nbsp; I know pretty rare, a thought came to this brain.&amp;nbsp; But way, way back when Canon decided they were going to change the FD lens mount I had a pretty heated discussion with the Canon rep for my area. I doubt he was wondering whether I was not happy or not.&amp;nbsp; I had a lot of money invested in FD glass.&amp;nbsp; Sure I was upset.&amp;nbsp; In the end&amp;nbsp;I knew he was right. There was just no way the FD mount could do all the great things Canon wanted to do with the new lens system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Times and things change.&amp;nbsp; Some, maybe most,&amp;nbsp;are best left in the past.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2018 05:11:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Recycling-decent-older-SLR-lenses/m-p/246523#M5557</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-26T05:11:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recycling decent older SLR lenses</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Recycling-decent-older-SLR-lenses/m-p/246567#M5558</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just as vintage vinyl has made something of a comeback those older lenses are probably best utilized on a matching quality older vintage film body.&amp;nbsp; Or alternatively a high quality "digital back" for a film camera that works with the lens mount is far more practical than repackaging the optics into a lens body and electronic architecture to work with a current DSLR.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rodger&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2018 21:12:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Recycling-decent-older-SLR-lenses/m-p/246567#M5558</guid>
      <dc:creator>wq9nsc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-26T21:12:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

