<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: RF 100-500mm Lens Components Floating? in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/336588#M4453</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I too purchased the RF 100-500mm lens from Amazon a couple of moths ago, but did not have the time to test it at the local sled dog races in the interior of Alaska. &amp;nbsp;I finally mounted the lens on my R6 last week and spent a couple of hours outdoors photographing the mushers and dogs. &amp;nbsp;The ambient temperature was around 2 degrees F.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I havent' experinced the problems mentioned above with this lens, but so far I am am not impressed by it, and feel that instead of this lens I should have purchased the EF 100-400mm L (version II) plus a 1.4x extender, simply because this lens has been proven as a workhorse. &amp;nbsp;RF lenses with IS plus IBIS working together are supposed to be superior to EF with IS and IBIS. &amp;nbsp;But is this true in real life situations? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since I am not en expert, all I can do is to tell you how the RF 100-500 lens performed for me at the sled dog races compared to the EF 135mm L USM (this lens does not have IS). &amp;nbsp;The R6's image stabilization was turned on, and so auto ISO. I left the lens aperture to its default. I zommed the lens to 200mm, all the way to 500mm depending on the shot I was taking at the moment. &amp;nbsp;The ISO chosen by the R6 was 100, and the shutter speed remained around 400s all the way through.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, I could have changed the shutter speed to 500s or even 800s, but I wanted to test the lens alllowing the R6 to do its work automatically on Av mode. &amp;nbsp;When looking at the RAW images at home, they were not as sharp as I expected from a L lens. &amp;nbsp;These images look soft to me, specially the dogs eyes (I set the R6 for animals, eyes focus, and to track the lead dogs).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The second day of the races I decided to used my trusted EF 135mm f/2 L "adapted" to the R6 (remember, not IS on this les). &amp;nbsp;I set the aperture to f/6.5, and preceeded to shootway. &amp;nbsp;The shutter speed stayed around 500s thoughout, and the images are quite sharp compared to the ones above (some cropped to 400%). &amp;nbsp;I can only assume that they are sharper because of the faster shutter speed (?). &amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;Camera was handheld.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will continue testing the 100-500mm lens, but I already know that I am not using it to photograph the sled dog races in the interior of Alaska. For this I will continue using my very of and reliable EF 200mm f/2.8 L (black color with a red ring at the front and no IS), and the 135 f/2 L. &amp;nbsp;The images resulting from my 7D and these two lenses can be cropped over 300% and still look very sharp. Not so the photos I just took usig the RF 100-500. In fact, 100% crop was not good enough for me.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will return to post some photos in the near future.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By the way, I have already registered both the R6 and the RF 100-500mm lens, but they still don't show in my list of Canon products I own.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edited on March 09, 2021&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;I had to come back and edit as a token of apology to all who have read my coments about my first impressions of the canon RF 100-500mm. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;My apology is as folllows: &amp;nbsp;The main problem relating to the performance of this lens relates to user error, not the lens itself. &amp;nbsp;in this case I forgot to switch the lens IS from the number 1 position (stationaty subjects) to number 2 (moving subjects), so only IBISn was active when I was photgraphing the sled dog races. &amp;nbsp;The lens performe quite well when zoomed to perhaps 200-250mm, and not as well when zoomed past that because its aperture was then greatly reduced to perhaps f/7.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;I have a lot of testing to do in the near future, but at least the lens operation in relatively cold weather for a period of two or three hours went well. &amp;nbsp;The ambient temperature was from just below zero F. to perhaps a maximum of 10 degrees F.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 04:28:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RamfromAlaska</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-03-10T04:28:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RF 100-500mm Lens Components Floating?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/330214#M4425</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So I finally received the new Canon RF 100-500mm F4.5-7.1 L IS USM lens. Took it for a test run and shot about 40 photos. Everything seemed good. Purchased a clear lens filter and installed it. During installation of the filter, I noticed inside the lens that the components seemed to be floating and rattling around. Not just a little bit, like 1/4" or more, while the lens was off the camera. Re-installed the lens on the camera (EOS-R) and attempted to "re-park" the IS, but nothing seemed to change after I took the lens off. The same interior movement with the insides banging around. Is this normal? I can't imaging this is good for wear and tear on the lens. The insides will be banging around just while walking down the street. Anyone else notice this? Or is my lens defective? Just never had this happen before with a lens. Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2021 21:10:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/330214#M4425</guid>
      <dc:creator>hoot24</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-04T21:10:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF 100-500mm Lens Components Floating?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/330221#M4426</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The mirrorless bodies have an option to retract the lens on power down. &amp;nbsp;Some DSLRs have it, too, but all Canon mirrorless bodies seem to have it. &amp;nbsp;Also, documentation says you should power down the cameras prior to changing lenses, particularly with lenses that have IS because IS is always active.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2021 22:31:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/330221#M4426</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-04T22:31:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF 100-500mm Lens Components Floating?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/330236#M4427</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Pretty much understand what you are saying, but that's not it. &amp;nbsp;The only time the floating parts stop floating is when the lens is on the camera and the camera is powered on. &amp;nbsp;I have never seen this kind of IS movement in a lens before. &amp;nbsp;It literally bangs against the interior lens side walls when "jiggled" a bit. &amp;nbsp;Maybe it's normal, i just want to make sure..... these lens are not cheap. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 00:53:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/330236#M4427</guid>
      <dc:creator>hoot24</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-05T00:53:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF 100-500mm Lens Components Floating?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/330243#M4428</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/159351"&gt;@hoot24&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pretty much understand what you are saying, but that's not it. &amp;nbsp;The only time the floating parts stop floating is when the lens is on the camera and the camera is powered on. &amp;nbsp;I have never seen this kind of IS movement in a lens before. &amp;nbsp;It literally bangs against the interior lens side walls when "jiggled" a bit. &amp;nbsp;Maybe it's normal, i just want to make sure..... these lens are not cheap. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Of course, you should contact Canon. &amp;nbsp;The R5 and R6 have been know to rattle with power turned off.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think some lenses seem like they need to be "parked" for lack of a better term.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 03:24:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/330243#M4428</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-05T03:24:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF 100-500mm Lens Components Floating?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/330250#M4429</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I did call Canon and they sugguested I try the "parking" routine. &amp;nbsp;Did not work. &amp;nbsp;Components continued to rattle around when the lens is on or off camera. &amp;nbsp;The Canon rep was very helpful though as they actually had a copy of this same lens in front of them when I spoke with them. &amp;nbsp;The rep's response was, "yeah that really does move around a lot". &amp;nbsp;So at this point I am still not certain about whether or not this "floating" that I am seeing is expected or not from this lens. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 07:41:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/330250#M4429</guid>
      <dc:creator>hoot24</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-05T07:41:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF 100-500mm Lens Components Floating?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/330327#M4430</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have no idea what is normal but you have a year to find out.&amp;nbsp; Make sure you register it.&amp;nbsp; Use it as you normaly would and don't worry, for a year anyway. In the tenth or eleventh month have a C&amp;amp;C done on it by Canon.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BTW, I do hope you got a filter equal to the level of the lens? If not check out B+W protecto filters.&amp;nbsp; They will not interfere&amp;nbsp;with the IQ ro AF ability of the lens, others might!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 16:48:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/330327#M4430</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-05T16:48:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF 100-500mm Lens Components Floating?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/330331#M4431</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yep, registered it right away.&amp;nbsp; And good point, i will just use the lens and keep an eye on it for 9 months or so.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And yes, B+W filters for me.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 17:20:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/330331#M4431</guid>
      <dc:creator>hoot24</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-05T17:20:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF 100-500mm Lens Components Floating?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/330339#M4432</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The C&amp;amp;C later on will cost you a little, but on such an expensive lens it will be worth&amp;nbsp;it and give&amp;nbsp;you peace of&amp;nbsp;mind. Now go enjoy it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 18:00:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/330339#M4432</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-05T18:00:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF 100-500mm Lens Components Floating?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/330389#M4433</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Follow up from Canon support:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear Sir,&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you for writing to us. My name is Exxx and I understand you have questions about the RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1L IS USM lens and I can assist. It is normal for the components inside the lens to move around. The image stabilization in this lens does not have a "parked" mode. The RF mount lenses use a more advanced image stabilization from the EF lenses. Please let us know if we can be of any further assistance.&amp;nbsp; Thank you for choosing Canon.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So there you have it..... Canon says it's "normal".&amp;nbsp; Welp, I sure hope so.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 22:14:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/330389#M4433</guid>
      <dc:creator>hoot24</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-05T22:14:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF 100-500mm Lens Components Floating?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/331628#M4434</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Hoot, I had the exact same question/concern and just noticed it over the weekend. &amp;nbsp; Spent some time with Canon support (phone) this morning and didn't really get any clarity. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;I've owned many EF lenses and also the RF 24-105......none of them have had this much wobble/play in them (including those with IS). &amp;nbsp; It seems odd, but at the same time when attached to the camera, and powered on, that internal component seems to firm up. &amp;nbsp; So I guess while out hiking around you just have to leave the camera on, or accept that it is going to wobble. &amp;nbsp; For a $2500 lens this seems like a significant flaw.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I prepared this graphic/image to help illustrate, but oddly Canon support can't accept an photo while on the phone. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;The yellow line highlights the element that is wobbling, and the red circle the fixed portion it should be concentric too (or reasonably concentric).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Would love for a lens expert to confirm whether this is normal or a warranty item.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/26980i01AADE96D186379A/image-size/original?v=1.0&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="2021-01-18_08-26-24.jpg" title="2021-01-18_08-26-24.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 17:18:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/331628#M4434</guid>
      <dc:creator>timjd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-18T17:18:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF 100-500mm Lens Components Floating?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/332148#M4436</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2021/01/the-secret-of-the-broken-element-a-canon-rf-100-500mm-f4-7-7-1-teardown/" target="_blank"&gt;Lens Rentals | Blog&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2021 01:10:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/332148#M4436</guid>
      <dc:creator>jrhoffman75</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-23T01:10:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF 100-500mm Lens Components Floating?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/332415#M4437</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I was just about to point that out...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2021 16:16:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/332415#M4437</guid>
      <dc:creator>kvbarkley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-25T16:16:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF 100-500mm Lens Components Floating?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/332480#M4438</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good to see Lens Rentals review...... Makes me feel a little bit better about what I am seeing inside my lens. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2021 09:47:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/332480#M4438</guid>
      <dc:creator>hoot24</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-26T09:47:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF 100-500mm Lens Components Floating?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/332489#M4439</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Me too hoot...although I still think it was an odd design decision. &amp;nbsp; I guess warranties will start coming up next fall when the first crop of these went out, so there will be time to see if this problem evolves with us.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:09:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/332489#M4439</guid>
      <dc:creator>timjd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-26T13:09:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF 100-500mm Lens Components Floating?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/335502#M4440</link>
      <description>I just noticed this last night and was wondering if overtime it would wear down the lens. I bought it knowing I would eventually use it during a lot of hiking so imagine my face when I looked into the lens and saw that not only does it move but it moves a lot when not in use.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 16:18:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/335502#M4440</guid>
      <dc:creator>shellbo6901</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-24T16:18:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF 100-500mm Lens Components Floating?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/335505#M4441</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That's the million dollar question. &amp;nbsp; Or $2000+ question anyway. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Moving parts and Electronics have a long history of failing.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 17:03:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/335505#M4441</guid>
      <dc:creator>timjd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-24T17:03:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF 100-500mm Lens Components Floating?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/335555#M4442</link>
      <description>Yes but should they be moving?! I’ve seen some say that it shouldn’t do it during use or when connected to the camera and it’s on, but it still does. Seems like if they are moving any without actually changing a setting that it isn’t correct. What’s keep it from moving when you press the shutter?! Of course there has to be movement at some point especially for stabilization but I assume that is purposely moved not just because in storage it is tilted one way or another. Just assuming it should be in one position when not in use. Kind of like the project you do as a kid of how to safely drop an egg without cracking it, I just want to make sure it’s supposed to be like that. I can’t physically be on one end of the camera and the end of the lens to look inside, just seems like all the time movement defeats the purpose of needing to be still when shooting fast moving subjects(etc).</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 02:40:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/335555#M4442</guid>
      <dc:creator>shellbo6901</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-25T02:40:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF 100-500mm Lens Components Floating?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/335567#M4443</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;"&lt;SPAN&gt;I can’t physically be on one end of the camera and the end of the lens to look inside, just seems like all the time movement defeats the purpose of needing to be still when shooting fast moving subjects(etc)."&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Set the camera up with 10-second self timer so you can look in the lens.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 12:01:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/335567#M4443</guid>
      <dc:creator>jrhoffman75</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-25T12:01:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF 100-500mm Lens Components Floating?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/335572#M4444</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It only moves when no power is applied.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 14:07:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/335572#M4444</guid>
      <dc:creator>kvbarkley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-25T14:07:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF 100-500mm Lens Components Floating?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/335577#M4445</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Like I was saying in an earlier post I never got a satisfactory answer from Canon tech support. &amp;nbsp; After a lengthy phone call where I explained the situation, and shared the image I put on here, they still couldn't confirm or deny that it is normal or a problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've got about 6 months left on the waranty so just plan on watching it and monitoring forums like this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It would sure be great if Canon could address this though. &amp;nbsp;State this is normal, and maybe extend the warranty for any issues related to this that might develop after 3-4 years of use.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 14:33:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-100-500mm-Lens-Components-Floating/m-p/335577#M4445</guid>
      <dc:creator>timjd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-25T14:33:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

