<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Best camera lens five inches or less fully extended in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Best-camera-lens-five-inches-or-less-fully-extended/m-p/230765#M4241</link>
    <description>At five inches, or less, you probably do not want to use a DSLR. Consider a bridge camera, which cost roughly the same price as most consumer grade, telephoto lenses.</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2018 16:21:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-01-20T16:21:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Best camera lens five inches or less fully extended</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Best-camera-lens-five-inches-or-less-fully-extended/m-p/230685#M4238</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm going to a monster truck show at Ford Field, i'll be in the 27th row from the field.&amp;nbsp; My question is what would be the best lens five inches or less when fully extended to use on a 70D camera.&amp;nbsp; Right now the only lens I have is five inches or less a 10-20mm.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 18:37:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Best-camera-lens-five-inches-or-less-fully-extended/m-p/230685#M4238</guid>
      <dc:creator>trailboss</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-19T18:37:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best camera lens five inches or less fully extended</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Best-camera-lens-five-inches-or-less-fully-extended/m-p/230690#M4239</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you want longer reach, the EF-S 55-250 is 4.4 inches. I doubt that is fully extended, though.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The EF-S 18-200 is only 6.4 " extended.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 20:10:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Best-camera-lens-five-inches-or-less-fully-extended/m-p/230690#M4239</guid>
      <dc:creator>kvbarkley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-19T20:10:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best camera lens five inches or less fully extended</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Best-camera-lens-five-inches-or-less-fully-extended/m-p/230756#M4240</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The Sigma&amp;nbsp;18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM&amp;nbsp; C is around 4 inches.&amp;nbsp; But I usually don't use the word "best" when describing all-in-one zooms.&amp;nbsp; IMHO, none of them are 'best'.&amp;nbsp; I am guessing there is a restriction on what camera gear you are allowed?&amp;nbsp; So you want something that covers a large range?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Of course I have been under the same restrictions many times in the past.&amp;nbsp; Is this a sport you like and are going to attend&amp;nbsp;as much as possible in the future?&amp;nbsp; I am going to suggest a different route for you.&amp;nbsp; The&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Canon&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;PowerShot G1 X Mark II Digital Camera.&amp;nbsp; I have one and it goes everywhere I can't take my 1Dx.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Sometimes it isn't the lens that is the issue.&amp;nbsp; It is the camera itself.&amp;nbsp; Check out the&amp;nbsp;Canon&amp;nbsp;PowerShot G1 X Mark II Digital Camera with its 24-105mm f2 lens which is included.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2018 15:56:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Best-camera-lens-five-inches-or-less-fully-extended/m-p/230756#M4240</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-20T15:56:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best camera lens five inches or less fully extended</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Best-camera-lens-five-inches-or-less-fully-extended/m-p/230765#M4241</link>
      <description>At five inches, or less, you probably do not want to use a DSLR. Consider a bridge camera, which cost roughly the same price as most consumer grade, telephoto lenses.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2018 16:21:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Best-camera-lens-five-inches-or-less-fully-extended/m-p/230765#M4241</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-20T16:21:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best camera lens five inches or less fully extended</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Best-camera-lens-five-inches-or-less-fully-extended/m-p/230775#M4242</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ford Field's camera policy doesn't say anything about extended vs. non-extended. &amp;nbsp;I generally find those doing the inspection are looking at a camera "as is" ... they're usually aren't grabbing it and fiddling with it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Canon makes a special "Diffactive Optics" version of the 70-300...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whereas Canon's "L" series lens have a red stripe/ring around the front of the lens barrel to indicate that it's an L series lens, the "DO" lenses get a green stripe/ring around the front of the lens barrel.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The point of diffractive optics is to allow for a much more compact lens than would otherwise be needed to achieve the focal lengths. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Canon's spec page lists the length of this lens at 3.9" ... but roughly .3" fit inside the camera when mounted. &amp;nbsp;So the bit that sticks out is 3.6" long. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The lens DOES EXEND longer... but there is a zoom-lock switch that you can engage to prevent it from extending.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If this is a one-time thing, then I'd consider renting one. &amp;nbsp;Rental is about $50 for 3 days... or about $70 for a week (rounded off price ... I looked at LensRentals and BorrowLenses websites.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The "bridge" camera is a good suggestion. &amp;nbsp;That would be something like a Canon Powershot SX60 HS. &amp;nbsp;The whole camera body is 4.5" front to back (not just the lens) ... but again... that's the size when retracted, not extended. &amp;nbsp;I don't see extended lengths specified anywhere. &amp;nbsp;But the lens zooms to 247mm... in "35mm equivalent" (since this camera has a smaller sensor) that works out to&amp;nbsp;1365mm ... or in APS-C equivalence that's 2184mm. &amp;nbsp;So it's huge telephoto (optically it's not really going to compete and it is a tiny sensor camera).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2018 17:36:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Best-camera-lens-five-inches-or-less-fully-extended/m-p/230775#M4242</guid>
      <dc:creator>TCampbell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-20T17:36:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

