<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: RF Lens build quality? in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-Lens-build-quality/m-p/321556#M4171</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Here is the build of the 50mm:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2018/12/disassembly-of-the-canon-rf-50mm-f1-2l/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2018/12/disassembly-of-the-canon-rf-50mm-f1-2l/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 13:39:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kvbarkley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-10-15T13:39:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RF Lens build quality?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-Lens-build-quality/m-p/321538#M4170</link>
      <description>&lt;P class="_1qeIAgB0cPwnLhDF9XSiJM"&gt;Hi all. So I've begun my transition from the Sony ecosystem, and I have to say the RF lenses feel like toys and makes me question their durability. My GM lenses felt like they could take a hit (which they did!) whereas the RF lenses just feel very flimsy in comparison. Moreover, they feel like toys compared to their EF counterparts. To note, I have the 15-35 and 70-200. The latter feels better than the former, but I don't feel confident with either.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="_1qeIAgB0cPwnLhDF9XSiJM"&gt;I worry that I have to baby them even more than I usually would my glass. Can anyone here comment on their durability?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 11:25:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-Lens-build-quality/m-p/321538#M4170</guid>
      <dc:creator>FabrinRodriguez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-15T11:25:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF Lens build quality?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-Lens-build-quality/m-p/321556#M4171</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Here is the build of the 50mm:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2018/12/disassembly-of-the-canon-rf-50mm-f1-2l/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2018/12/disassembly-of-the-canon-rf-50mm-f1-2l/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 13:39:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-Lens-build-quality/m-p/321556#M4171</guid>
      <dc:creator>kvbarkley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-15T13:39:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF Lens build quality?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-Lens-build-quality/m-p/321567#M4172</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"...&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;I have to say the RF lenses feel like toys&amp;nbsp;...&amp;nbsp;I have the 15-35 and&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;70-200."&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;You are saying this lens feels like a "toy"?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;RF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM Lens&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/25458iF26463058FE97667/image-size/original?v=1.0&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="canon_rf_70_200mm.jpg" title="canon_rf_70_200mm.jpg" width="330" height="326" /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2020 14:40:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-Lens-build-quality/m-p/321567#M4172</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-15T14:40:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

