<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: New RF 70-200 knick on inside element??? in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/New-RF-70-200-knick-on-inside-element/m-p/317053#M3919</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"I just recieved a brand new Canon RF 70-200 2.8 from Adorama."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Call Helen Oster at Adorama and explain the story. I am sure she will send you another one without the scratch which I, too, believe won't effect the IQ. It is too small to effect contrast.&amp;nbsp; You would need several nicks like that. It is the fact it is a very expensive lens and needs to be perfect like a very expensive lens.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2020 13:48:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-08-20T13:48:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>New RF 70-200 knick on inside element???</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/New-RF-70-200-knick-on-inside-element/m-p/317016#M3915</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I just recieved a brand new Canon RF 70-200 2.8 from Adorama.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;When inspecting the front element I noticed what seemed to be a dust particle out of the box.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Went outside in direct sunlight and it seems to be a tiny scratch or knick on the inner lens element.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm assuming this would greatly impact the photos and on a lens of this quality/price I wouldn't expect this.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;It's hard to get a picture of it and didn't know what my next steps are with this.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Below is a link to the pictures I tried to get of it:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://imgur.com/a/vbvCFwx" target="_blank"&gt;https://imgur.com/a/vbvCFwx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 19:00:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/New-RF-70-200-knick-on-inside-element/m-p/317016#M3915</guid>
      <dc:creator>TonySmithJr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-19T19:00:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New RF 70-200 knick on inside element???</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/New-RF-70-200-knick-on-inside-element/m-p/317035#M3916</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;While you can certainly try and get your money back, it almost certainly will not affect image quality.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2019/04/removing-fly-from-weather-sealed-canon-70-200mm/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2019/04/removing-fly-from-weather-sealed-canon-70-200mm/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 21:31:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/New-RF-70-200-knick-on-inside-element/m-p/317035#M3916</guid>
      <dc:creator>kvbarkley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-19T21:31:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New RF 70-200 knick on inside element???</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/New-RF-70-200-knick-on-inside-element/m-p/317041#M3917</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I took it in the backyard to test it and you are correct. I didn't notice anything in the area where the small scratch is.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If it wasn't for a sporting event I have to shoot this weekend I would probably send it back. No reason to spend $2600 on some glass and it show up with a scratch on the inner element.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2020 02:21:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/New-RF-70-200-knick-on-inside-element/m-p/317041#M3917</guid>
      <dc:creator>TonySmithJr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-20T02:21:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New RF 70-200 knick on inside element???</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/New-RF-70-200-knick-on-inside-element/m-p/317052#M3918</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Actually, the effects are not usually localized, generally it manifests as a loss of contrast because of the light scattering.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2020 13:33:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/New-RF-70-200-knick-on-inside-element/m-p/317052#M3918</guid>
      <dc:creator>kvbarkley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-20T13:33:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New RF 70-200 knick on inside element???</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/New-RF-70-200-knick-on-inside-element/m-p/317053#M3919</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"I just recieved a brand new Canon RF 70-200 2.8 from Adorama."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Call Helen Oster at Adorama and explain the story. I am sure she will send you another one without the scratch which I, too, believe won't effect the IQ. It is too small to effect contrast.&amp;nbsp; You would need several nicks like that. It is the fact it is a very expensive lens and needs to be perfect like a very expensive lens.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2020 13:48:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/New-RF-70-200-knick-on-inside-element/m-p/317053#M3919</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-20T13:48:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New RF 70-200 knick on inside element???</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/New-RF-70-200-knick-on-inside-element/m-p/317065#M3920</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks, I will do that.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;I agree it won't affect the IQ but this also isn't some $500 piece of glass.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:07:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/New-RF-70-200-knick-on-inside-element/m-p/317065#M3920</guid>
      <dc:creator>TonySmithJr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-08-20T15:07:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

