<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Which lens??? in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Which-lens-RF28-70mm-vs-RF24-70mm/m-p/541027#M36972</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;p4pictures nailed it, the RF 28-70mm F2.8 IS STM @ $1000 is a very nice budget friendly lens. If you don't need the speed of a f2.8 another option is the RF24-240mm F4-6.3 IS USM which is $900. If image quality in also very nice, you will pick up a slight gain in the field of view over the RF 28-70mm F2.8 but will compromise the speed of the lens. If you don't shoot a lot of low light it may be an option. This was an early morning, overcast shot on an R6 MkII &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="RF 24-240 f7.1 @ 1/160 ISO ISO 100" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/65330i3A0ECFB7D0628B5E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Kennebunkport_II.jpg" alt="RF 24-240 f7.1 @ 1/160 ISO ISO 100" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;RF 24-240 f7.1 @ 1/160 ISO ISO 100&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:11:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>March411</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-03-24T00:11:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Which lens??? RF28-70mm vs RF24-70mm</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Which-lens-RF28-70mm-vs-RF24-70mm/m-p/540966#M36969</link>
      <description>&lt;P class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Is the Canon RF28-70mm F2.8 is STM&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;a good budget friendly equivalent (or close equivalent) to the Canon RF24-70mm F2.8 L is USM Lens?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 13:21:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Which-lens-RF28-70mm-vs-RF24-70mm/m-p/540966#M36969</guid>
      <dc:creator>wisemonkey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-25T13:21:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which lens???</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Which-lens-RF28-70mm-vs-RF24-70mm/m-p/540974#M36970</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes that is exactly what the RF 28-70mm F2.8 IS STM lens is, a great budget version of the RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You lose a little at the wide-angle end, you get the smoother STM focus motor that is slightly less snappy at switching focus than the USM motor in the L-series lens, you also save weight and money. You also miss out on the weather sealing of the L-series lens.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Probably for most general photography the biggest difference is the field of view difference between 24mm and 28mm especially if you are in a location where you cannot move further back to get more in.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2025 18:27:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Which-lens-RF28-70mm-vs-RF24-70mm/m-p/540974#M36970</guid>
      <dc:creator>p4pictures</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-23T18:27:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which lens???</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Which-lens-RF28-70mm-vs-RF24-70mm/m-p/541027#M36972</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;p4pictures nailed it, the RF 28-70mm F2.8 IS STM @ $1000 is a very nice budget friendly lens. If you don't need the speed of a f2.8 another option is the RF24-240mm F4-6.3 IS USM which is $900. If image quality in also very nice, you will pick up a slight gain in the field of view over the RF 28-70mm F2.8 but will compromise the speed of the lens. If you don't shoot a lot of low light it may be an option. This was an early morning, overcast shot on an R6 MkII &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="RF 24-240 f7.1 @ 1/160 ISO ISO 100" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/65330i3A0ECFB7D0628B5E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Kennebunkport_II.jpg" alt="RF 24-240 f7.1 @ 1/160 ISO ISO 100" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;RF 24-240 f7.1 @ 1/160 ISO ISO 100&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:11:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Which-lens-RF28-70mm-vs-RF24-70mm/m-p/541027#M36972</guid>
      <dc:creator>March411</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-24T00:11:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which lens???</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Which-lens-RF28-70mm-vs-RF24-70mm/m-p/541125#M36978</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would say what are your goals? Are you a hobbyists or a looking as a professional? Hobbyists, yes, but pro maybe not as good of a choice. 4 may sound like a small number and it is but when comparing FL at the short end of a lens 4mm is quite a large number. Plus there is build quality. A day in day out has to be there lens is a different consideration.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 15:01:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Which-lens-RF28-70mm-vs-RF24-70mm/m-p/541125#M36978</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-03-24T15:01:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which lens??? RF28-70mm vs RF24-70mm</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Which-lens-RF28-70mm-vs-RF24-70mm/m-p/593353#M39970</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It’s a great lens, and Canon advertises it as near L quality. If you’re not a professional it’s more than good enough. If you are a professional it’s also more than good enough. I chose it over the 24 because without pixel peeping you wont see a difference and clients will never see a difference, and it is much more compact.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 10:21:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Which-lens-RF28-70mm-vs-RF24-70mm/m-p/593353#M39970</guid>
      <dc:creator>AIPickles</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-20T10:21:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which lens??? RF28-70mm vs RF24-70mm</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Which-lens-RF28-70mm-vs-RF24-70mm/m-p/593368#M39972</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"&amp;nbsp;If you are a professional it’s also more than good enough."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As long as you are only thinking of IQ. The build which is just as important to a full time working pro that IQ is. Now the word"pro" means what? Some guy that sold a photo last month or year ago or the guy like me that used his gear almost every single day. And that gear had to work every single time.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 14:31:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Which-lens-RF28-70mm-vs-RF24-70mm/m-p/593368#M39972</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-20T14:31:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

