<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: EOS R7 Lens choice for low light, landscapes, architecture, transport, portraits in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EOS-R7-Lens-choice-for-low-light-landscapes-architecture/m-p/508047#M34187</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Comparing the two lenses the kit and Siggy you aren't picking up much at the short end. Not even a full stop but at the long side you do see some benefit. Generally a stop or even two is not a deal maker especially with the the newer cameras and post editing using a raw file. But, yes, personally I would prefer the&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN. I don't care for variable aperture lenses and that to me is what makes it the go to choice. Is it available in an RF mount? I don't know.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 14:32:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-10-23T14:32:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EOS R7 Lens choice for low light, landscapes, architecture, transport, portraits</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EOS-R7-Lens-choice-for-low-light-landscapes-architecture/m-p/508000#M34185</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have recently bought a Canon R7 Mirrorless with the 18-150mm kit and I absolutely love it! But I find for dark indoors or other low light I feel that I may be better with something that has a aperture that allows more light in or something not so versatile or complex.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have been thinking if I would be right to get the Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN &amp;amp; the 10-18 as well to compliment and be used alongside my main versatile lens, or if that is "throwing good money after bad" and just pointless.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The review for both on YouTube seem very good with some softness or drop off but nothing tragic and of course neither have IS which is ok I guess (wouldn't say so).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I take landscapes and architecture and transport pics with the rare portraits too. Basically all rounder!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not a professional more a hobbyist and certainly not the most stable, so curious if IBIS will be enough.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help will be appreciated!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the Canon 18-150mm kit and don't think I'd want to sell it, so either would be in addition to&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 12:32:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EOS-R7-Lens-choice-for-low-light-landscapes-architecture/m-p/508000#M34185</guid>
      <dc:creator>rwagga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-23T12:32:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EOS R7 Lens choice for low light, landscapes, architecture, transport, portraits</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EOS-R7-Lens-choice-for-low-light-landscapes-architecture/m-p/508047#M34187</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Comparing the two lenses the kit and Siggy you aren't picking up much at the short end. Not even a full stop but at the long side you do see some benefit. Generally a stop or even two is not a deal maker especially with the the newer cameras and post editing using a raw file. But, yes, personally I would prefer the&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN. I don't care for variable aperture lenses and that to me is what makes it the go to choice. Is it available in an RF mount? I don't know.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 14:32:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EOS-R7-Lens-choice-for-low-light-landscapes-architecture/m-p/508047#M34187</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-23T14:32:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EOS R7 Lens choice for low light, landscapes, architecture, transport, portraits</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EOS-R7-Lens-choice-for-low-light-landscapes-architecture/m-p/508098#M34200</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Whether&amp;nbsp; you need a lens with IBIS has a lot to do with the conditions under which you shoot, and your technique.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Focal Length and Shutter Speed:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Conventional wisdom suggests that the minimum shutter speed to get a steady shot when hand-holding a lens without stabilization is 1/focal length.&amp;nbsp; However, you are using a crop sensor camera and that demands an extra factor so, in your case, a safer value would be 1/ (2x FL).&amp;nbsp; So,&amp;nbsp; you would be looking for shutter speeds in a range from 1/40 to 1/100sec for the Sigma 18-50 and 1/20- 1/40 for the 10-18 lenses.&amp;nbsp; With stabilization you could do without the 2x factor in that equation.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Technique&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&lt;BR /&gt;A lot of people coming from a cell phone tend to hold a camera in the same way, with arms extended, looking at the LCD in the rear.&amp;nbsp; This is not a good technique because dedicated cameras are heavier and have longer physical focal lengths.&amp;nbsp; The &lt;EM&gt;correct&lt;/EM&gt; way to hold a camera for still photography is as shown in the image below:&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR /&gt;You want to use the viewfinder with the camera pressed to your brow.&amp;nbsp; The heel of the left hand under the body, with the fingers curled around the lens from beneath to manage the zoom.&amp;nbsp; The right hand is free to gently press the controls and shutter. The arms are tucked tight to the torso.&amp;nbsp; Thus, with the eye to the camera, your body creates a tripod effect and that can compensate for the lack of Image Stabilization.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="How to hold a camera properly.jpg" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/59712i1F8A9CD4C62B09BE/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="How to hold a camera properly.jpg" alt="How to hold a camera properly.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Aperture&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&lt;BR /&gt;The Sigma offers one more stop of light than the Canon, which can be expressed either in terms of being able to use a faster shutter speed, or lower ISO.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Light&lt;/STRONG&gt;:&lt;BR /&gt;The lower the light, the slower the shutter speed, wider the aperture or higher the ISO must be.&amp;nbsp; It's always a play-off.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As always, much depends on what you are prepared to invest, but I would note that the build of the Sigma is considered superior with such differences as a metal lens mount and better engineered plastics - they just feel a lot better quality.&amp;nbsp; The down side is that you pay more, but most consider you get what you pay for.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 19:11:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EOS-R7-Lens-choice-for-low-light-landscapes-architecture/m-p/508098#M34200</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tronhard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-23T19:11:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EOS R7 Lens choice for low light, landscapes, architecture, transport, portraits</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EOS-R7-Lens-choice-for-low-light-landscapes-architecture/m-p/508176#M34205</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 08:38:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EOS-R7-Lens-choice-for-low-light-landscapes-architecture/m-p/508176#M34205</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-24T08:38:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

