<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Rf 100mm for macro? in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Rf-100mm-for-macro/m-p/506886#M34080</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;To start with I am pretty confident Brian meant to write the RF100 and not the&amp;nbsp;RF 1000mm. The RF 100mm F2.8L Macro is a great lens that will allow you to achieve the exact images you described in your post. Here is an example of what the lens can do.....&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Check out the reflection of the flower in the insects eyes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Racing Bee.jpg" style="width: 788px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/59796iB648E12C6D69D17B/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Racing Bee.jpg" alt="Racing Bee.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 18:16:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>March411</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-10-17T18:16:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Rf 100mm for macro?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Rf-100mm-for-macro/m-p/506803#M34067</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So I have a canon r7 and want to ask if A 100mm rf 2.8 would be the best choice for macro AF?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will be my first macro lens and I want to take pictures from Bugs where you can see every detail and where you can see their face. what do you guys think about the combo: rf 100mm +AK Diffusor+ 350C Flashlight+Raynox ring for better closeups?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 11:40:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Rf-100mm-for-macro/m-p/506803#M34067</guid>
      <dc:creator>bronwod2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-17T11:40:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rf 100mm for macro?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Rf-100mm-for-macro/m-p/506878#M34078</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The only RF lens with life-size and more macro is the RF 100mm F2.8L Macro IS USM - &lt;EM&gt;to reduce confusion I edited the 1000mm to 100mm&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt; . It's a great lens, super sharp and an ideal partner for EOS R-series cameras.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Depending on the size of your "bugs" you might want even closer capabilities and that gets a little more specialised. There are no Canon RF extension tubes available, though some independents do produce them. For maximum magnification, you would need to source the MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5x macro lens and the EF to EOS R mount adapter. This will magnify your subject 5x larger than life on the sensor, but the lens is manual focus only, and no longer in production.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 21:34:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Rf-100mm-for-macro/m-p/506878#M34078</guid>
      <dc:creator>p4pictures</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-17T21:34:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rf 100mm for macro?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Rf-100mm-for-macro/m-p/506883#M34079</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Brian:&lt;BR /&gt;As always, great advice, but I suspect you have one too many zeros in your FL!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 18:12:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Rf-100mm-for-macro/m-p/506883#M34079</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tronhard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-17T18:12:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rf 100mm for macro?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Rf-100mm-for-macro/m-p/506886#M34080</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;To start with I am pretty confident Brian meant to write the RF100 and not the&amp;nbsp;RF 1000mm. The RF 100mm F2.8L Macro is a great lens that will allow you to achieve the exact images you described in your post. Here is an example of what the lens can do.....&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Check out the reflection of the flower in the insects eyes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Racing Bee.jpg" style="width: 788px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/59796iB648E12C6D69D17B/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Racing Bee.jpg" alt="Racing Bee.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 18:16:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Rf-100mm-for-macro/m-p/506886#M34080</guid>
      <dc:creator>March411</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-17T18:16:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rf 100mm for macro?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Rf-100mm-for-macro/m-p/506888#M34081</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Oops mustn’t mention stuff that Canon hasn’t announced yet &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":face_with_tears_of_joy:"&gt;😂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 18:25:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Rf-100mm-for-macro/m-p/506888#M34081</guid>
      <dc:creator>p4pictures</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-17T18:25:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rf 100mm for macro?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Rf-100mm-for-macro/m-p/506889#M34082</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Now I want one!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 18:31:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Rf-100mm-for-macro/m-p/506889#M34082</guid>
      <dc:creator>March411</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-17T18:31:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rf 100mm for macro?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Rf-100mm-for-macro/m-p/506891#M34084</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In addition to Brian's excellent advice, if you are new to macro, make sure you understand how very thin the depth of field is at 1:1 and beyond and what is required to get the whole "bug" in focus.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 18:47:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Rf-100mm-for-macro/m-p/506891#M34084</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bazsl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-17T18:47:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rf 100mm for macro?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Rf-100mm-for-macro/m-p/506892#M34085</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Absolutely, I have total confidence that is what Brian meant but we all miss these tiny editing details and I expected he would want to get that right for anyone looking.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2024 19:10:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Rf-100mm-for-macro/m-p/506892#M34085</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tronhard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-17T19:10:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

