<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: RF 24-105 f4 L video autofocus performance on EOS R in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-24-105-f4-L-video-autofocus-performance-on-EOS-R/m-p/500120#M33322</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I think you will find that the limitation of the AF performance is down to the EOS R body more than the RF lens you put on it. EOS R was introduced with the RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM lens, and I know that the lens performs much better when used on later EOS R-series cameras.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:52:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>p4pictures</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-09-12T15:52:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RF 24-105 f4 L video autofocus performance on EOS R</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-24-105-f4-L-video-autofocus-performance-on-EOS-R/m-p/499970#M33316</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey everyone, thinking about getting this lens for my EOS R and was wondering how the video autofocus performance was. Right now im using the non L version of the lens and the autofocus is super slow. Anyone have any experience with this lens and camera for video&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;A class="" href="https://tutuapp.uno/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://tutuapp.uno/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt; ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 11:04:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-24-105-f4-L-video-autofocus-performance-on-EOS-R/m-p/499970#M33316</guid>
      <dc:creator>ashtama2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-23T11:04:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF 24-105 f4 L video autofocus performance on EOS R</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-24-105-f4-L-video-autofocus-performance-on-EOS-R/m-p/500120#M33322</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think you will find that the limitation of the AF performance is down to the EOS R body more than the RF lens you put on it. EOS R was introduced with the RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM lens, and I know that the lens performs much better when used on later EOS R-series cameras.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:52:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-24-105-f4-L-video-autofocus-performance-on-EOS-R/m-p/500120#M33322</guid>
      <dc:creator>p4pictures</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-12T15:52:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF 24-105 f4 L video autofocus performance on EOS R</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-24-105-f4-L-video-autofocus-performance-on-EOS-R/m-p/500166#M33324</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I agree with my colleague Brian.&amp;nbsp; The early R model cameras were somewhat tepid in their performance relative to the later models - they are, after all, a six year-old design. If you &lt;EM&gt;really&lt;/EM&gt; want to up the focus performance I would thus consider a body upgrade to the R6 or R6II.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Also, make sure you have LP-6NH batteries - as energy levels drop the performance can slow.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As regards the lens: I have the RF 14-105L f/4 and find it very fast to focus and has good optical performance when I use it on the R5, R6 and R6II.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:36:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/RF-24-105-f4-L-video-autofocus-performance-on-EOS-R/m-p/500166#M33324</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tronhard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-12T20:36:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

