<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Getting the RF28 f2.8 for my R50. How did you like your 28mm? in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Getting-the-RF28-f2-8-for-my-R50-How-did-you-like-your-28mm/m-p/492964#M32837</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;How did you like it for crop sensor?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The RF28 seems to be a good choice for me, the 35 is just a tad bit out of my budget since I just gotten the 50 I really like the form factor of the 28, it's perfect for the light and small/compact street photography setup I'm going for.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I already have the RF50 1.8 and the 18-45 kitlens.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I really like the 50 but it's just super tight, I like the kitlens too but it isn't fast enough and the aperture is just lacking.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How did you like the 28 for APSC?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 05:54:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>manaaju</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-08-12T05:54:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Getting the RF28 f2.8 for my R50. How did you like your 28mm?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Getting-the-RF28-f2-8-for-my-R50-How-did-you-like-your-28mm/m-p/492964#M32837</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;How did you like it for crop sensor?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The RF28 seems to be a good choice for me, the 35 is just a tad bit out of my budget since I just gotten the 50 I really like the form factor of the 28, it's perfect for the light and small/compact street photography setup I'm going for.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I already have the RF50 1.8 and the 18-45 kitlens.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I really like the 50 but it's just super tight, I like the kitlens too but it isn't fast enough and the aperture is just lacking.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How did you like the 28 for APSC?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2024 05:54:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Getting-the-RF28-f2-8-for-my-R50-How-did-you-like-your-28mm/m-p/492964#M32837</guid>
      <dc:creator>manaaju</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-12T05:54:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Getting the RF28 f2.8 for my R50. How did you like your 28mm?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Getting-the-RF28-f2-8-for-my-R50-How-did-you-like-your-28mm/m-p/493304#M32842</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"I already have the RF50 1.8 and the 18-45 kitlens."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This is a simple question you can answer for yourself. Set your kit lens to 28mm and put a small piece of gaffers tape on it to hold it there. Now live with it for a while and see if it works for you. You see a prime lens doesn't offer much after you get past the somewhat faster aperture because generally that's all they offer. Otherwise they are difficult to live with unless you have a specific need.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 16:25:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Getting-the-RF28-f2-8-for-my-R50-How-did-you-like-your-28mm/m-p/493304#M32842</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-08-13T16:25:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

