<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: RF 100-400 in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Thoughts-on-RF-100-400-as-replacement-for-EF-75-300/m-p/475220#M30911</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;What camera?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The RF lens will not work on an EF mount camera.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But if you have an R, there is no contest. Go with the 100-400.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 13:02:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kvbarkley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-04-30T13:02:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Thoughts on RF 100-400 as replacement for EF 75-300</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Thoughts-on-RF-100-400-as-replacement-for-EF-75-300/m-p/475179#M30901</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I’m thinking about buying the RF 100-400 to replace my 75-300. I’m unhappy with many of my recent photos from it and would like to zoom in a bit more. Is there anyone here who could provide some feedback on it? It will be used for sports and the odd wildlife shots.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 13:05:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Thoughts-on-RF-100-400-as-replacement-for-EF-75-300/m-p/475179#M30901</guid>
      <dc:creator>nusaka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-30T13:05:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF 100-400</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Thoughts-on-RF-100-400-as-replacement-for-EF-75-300/m-p/475189#M30903</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Greetings ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I purchased the RF100-400&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;as a lightweight travel lens.&amp;nbsp; For sports and wildlife photography, you're probably going to be limited to out door daytime shooting.&amp;nbsp; Shooting at night even under lights or indoor illumination could be challenging.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;From an image quality standpoint, it's a great lens.&amp;nbsp; It can be had for a great price on sale and refurbished.&amp;nbsp; I did buy a lens hood for mine which I use 90% of the time.&amp;nbsp; The extra 100 mm comes in very handy for longer distance shots.&amp;nbsp; It's also very light and easy to carry.&amp;nbsp; Sort of a sleeper lens that will definitely impress you.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 08:20:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Thoughts-on-RF-100-400-as-replacement-for-EF-75-300/m-p/475189#M30903</guid>
      <dc:creator>shadowsports</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-30T08:20:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF 100-400</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Thoughts-on-RF-100-400-as-replacement-for-EF-75-300/m-p/475213#M30906</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I also own the 100-400mm and use it frequently for wildlife and outdoor sports. I get great IQ in good light and as Rick said it light weight and a perfect all day carry lens. I used it extensively last week in some densely wooded areas and it performed very well but at times struggled because of a lack of light. Image quality was tack sharp but I had to push the ISO so I ended up with some noise. Software took care of the noise in post.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For outdoor sports it has been fantastic, focus is fast and on my R6 it is easy to capture fast moving action. I would recommend it with the caveat that it needs light. I also added a after market lens hood since one doesn't come with the lens.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 12:04:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Thoughts-on-RF-100-400-as-replacement-for-EF-75-300/m-p/475213#M30906</guid>
      <dc:creator>March411</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-30T12:04:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RF 100-400</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Thoughts-on-RF-100-400-as-replacement-for-EF-75-300/m-p/475220#M30911</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What camera?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The RF lens will not work on an EF mount camera.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But if you have an R, there is no contest. Go with the 100-400.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 13:02:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Thoughts-on-RF-100-400-as-replacement-for-EF-75-300/m-p/475220#M30911</guid>
      <dc:creator>kvbarkley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-30T13:02:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Thoughts on RF 100-400 as replacement for EF 75-300</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Thoughts-on-RF-100-400-as-replacement-for-EF-75-300/m-p/475234#M30918</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Excellent point and a good reason for me not to answer posts in the middle of the night.&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":grinning_squinting_face:"&gt;😆&lt;/span&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 14:11:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Thoughts-on-RF-100-400-as-replacement-for-EF-75-300/m-p/475234#M30918</guid>
      <dc:creator>shadowsports</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-04-30T14:11:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

