<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Canon RF 200-800mm F6.3-9 IS USM Lens Review by Bryan Carnathan... in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Canon-RF-200-800mm-F6-3-9-IS-USM-Lens-Review-by-Bryan-Carnathan/m-p/469746#M30425</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey everyone, I have been on the fence deciding whether or not to purchase the new RF 200-800mm F6.3-9 IS USM Lens, or the RF 100-500 and Tronhard posted a thread here titled "Which is Which",&amp;nbsp; where he compares the two in a picture comparison, which I thought was great.&amp;nbsp; It made me lean towards purchasing the RF 200-800.&amp;nbsp; However, the "narrow apertures" of the RF 200-800 made me hesitate a bit.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;So, I decided to research it further.&amp;nbsp; My concerns were that with such narrow apertures the lens wouldn't perform in cloudy, overcast days, and at dawn or dusk.&amp;nbsp; So, in my research after going through various reviews, I came across this review by Bryan Carnathan which I found to be so thorough that it would help others that are on the fence like me.&amp;nbsp; I'm no longer on the fence as the aforementioned review answered all the questions in depth with graphs, picture comparisons and data.&amp;nbsp; Not to mention the reasons why this lens is different from the RF L series and does not have the L series Red Ring. To give you an example of his review here is one of his illustrations.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;"&lt;/SPAN&gt;Here are focal length ranges reported by the RF 200-800mm F6.3-9 IS USM Lens in 1/3 stop apertures.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;200-267mm = f/6.3&lt;BR /&gt;268-454mm = f/7.1&lt;BR /&gt;455-636mm = f/8.0&lt;BR /&gt;637-800mm = f/9.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For reference, here are the RF 100-500's reported apertures:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;100-150mm = f/4.5&lt;BR /&gt;151-253mm = f/5.0&lt;BR /&gt;254-362mm = f/5.6&lt;BR /&gt;363-471mm = f/6.3&lt;BR /&gt;472-500mm = f/7.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While f/9 on the 200-800's long end sounds especially narrow, the difference at the RF 100-500's equivalent focal lengths is not so big, mostly 1/3 or 2/3 of a stop. F/9 is 2/3 stop wider than availed in the RF 800mm F11, Canon's even more affordable 800mm lens. "&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I recommend, that if you're on the fence like I was, take the time to read the entire review, you won't regret it.&amp;nbsp; It is very informative.&amp;nbsp; here is the link:&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-RF-200-800mm-F6-3-9-IS-USM-Lens.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Canon RF 200-800mm F6.3-9 IS USM Lens Review (the-digital-picture.com)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope that it helps you like it helped me and let me know what you think.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:16:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JFG</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-03-28T16:16:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Canon RF 200-800mm F6.3-9 IS USM Lens Review by Bryan Carnathan...</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Canon-RF-200-800mm-F6-3-9-IS-USM-Lens-Review-by-Bryan-Carnathan/m-p/469746#M30425</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey everyone, I have been on the fence deciding whether or not to purchase the new RF 200-800mm F6.3-9 IS USM Lens, or the RF 100-500 and Tronhard posted a thread here titled "Which is Which",&amp;nbsp; where he compares the two in a picture comparison, which I thought was great.&amp;nbsp; It made me lean towards purchasing the RF 200-800.&amp;nbsp; However, the "narrow apertures" of the RF 200-800 made me hesitate a bit.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;So, I decided to research it further.&amp;nbsp; My concerns were that with such narrow apertures the lens wouldn't perform in cloudy, overcast days, and at dawn or dusk.&amp;nbsp; So, in my research after going through various reviews, I came across this review by Bryan Carnathan which I found to be so thorough that it would help others that are on the fence like me.&amp;nbsp; I'm no longer on the fence as the aforementioned review answered all the questions in depth with graphs, picture comparisons and data.&amp;nbsp; Not to mention the reasons why this lens is different from the RF L series and does not have the L series Red Ring. To give you an example of his review here is one of his illustrations.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;"&lt;/SPAN&gt;Here are focal length ranges reported by the RF 200-800mm F6.3-9 IS USM Lens in 1/3 stop apertures.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;200-267mm = f/6.3&lt;BR /&gt;268-454mm = f/7.1&lt;BR /&gt;455-636mm = f/8.0&lt;BR /&gt;637-800mm = f/9.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For reference, here are the RF 100-500's reported apertures:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;100-150mm = f/4.5&lt;BR /&gt;151-253mm = f/5.0&lt;BR /&gt;254-362mm = f/5.6&lt;BR /&gt;363-471mm = f/6.3&lt;BR /&gt;472-500mm = f/7.1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While f/9 on the 200-800's long end sounds especially narrow, the difference at the RF 100-500's equivalent focal lengths is not so big, mostly 1/3 or 2/3 of a stop. F/9 is 2/3 stop wider than availed in the RF 800mm F11, Canon's even more affordable 800mm lens. "&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I recommend, that if you're on the fence like I was, take the time to read the entire review, you won't regret it.&amp;nbsp; It is very informative.&amp;nbsp; here is the link:&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-RF-200-800mm-F6-3-9-IS-USM-Lens.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Canon RF 200-800mm F6.3-9 IS USM Lens Review (the-digital-picture.com)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope that it helps you like it helped me and let me know what you think.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:16:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Canon-RF-200-800mm-F6-3-9-IS-USM-Lens-Review-by-Bryan-Carnathan/m-p/469746#M30425</guid>
      <dc:creator>JFG</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-28T16:16:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

