<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Your experience with the rf 100-500 and rf extenders? in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Your-experience-with-the-rf-100-500-and-rf-extenders/m-p/469618#M30412</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Personally I wouldn't know since I dislike extenders and almost never use them although I have six or seven. I almost never recommend anyone buy one especially the 2x models. I only know of two lenses that I consider worthy enough to use a 14x tel-con and then only very seldomly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But that is me and you said, &lt;EM&gt;"...&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;I haven't found this to be all that bad?"&lt;/EM&gt; If you think it is good enough and you are happy with the results you get, that is all that is important and required. What somebody else thinks is moot&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 14:59:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-03-27T14:59:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Your experience with the rf 100-500 and rf extenders?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Your-experience-with-the-rf-100-500-and-rf-extenders/m-p/469565#M30408</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Recently got a steal for the rf 100-500 and rf extenders (1.4, 2) for 1900 total.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I read and watch prior how there are limitations on focal length. However I haven't found this to be all that bad?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I plan on using the extenders, I'm already preemptively wanting to shoot beyond the 500mm mark.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The IQ to my surprised have been very good, and I was able to shoot some pretty solid videos handheld at 800-1000mm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not bad at all&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 03:51:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Your-experience-with-the-rf-100-500-and-rf-extenders/m-p/469565#M30408</guid>
      <dc:creator>onder</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-27T03:51:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Your experience with the rf 100-500 and rf extenders?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Your-experience-with-the-rf-100-500-and-rf-extenders/m-p/469618#M30412</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Personally I wouldn't know since I dislike extenders and almost never use them although I have six or seven. I almost never recommend anyone buy one especially the 2x models. I only know of two lenses that I consider worthy enough to use a 14x tel-con and then only very seldomly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But that is me and you said, &lt;EM&gt;"...&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;I haven't found this to be all that bad?"&lt;/EM&gt; If you think it is good enough and you are happy with the results you get, that is all that is important and required. What somebody else thinks is moot&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 14:59:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Your-experience-with-the-rf-100-500-and-rf-extenders/m-p/469618#M30412</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-03-27T14:59:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

