<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Yet another gear question for Africa photo safari in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Yet-another-gear-question-for-Africa-photo-safari/m-p/448336#M28740</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yep, I agree with Ricky.&amp;nbsp; The 24-240 is a brilliant optic but it's not a constant aperture and that would be the clincher.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 19:57:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tronhard</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-11-29T19:57:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Yet another gear question for Africa photo safari</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Yet-another-gear-question-for-Africa-photo-safari/m-p/448285#M28734</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Going to Kenya and Tanzania for 2 weeks in January. My primary camera is the R5 with a RF 100-500 lens. Secondary camera is a R6M2. Trying to decide on lens for R6M2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Own both the RF 24-240 and the RF 24-105 F/4 lenses. Can only take one of these two. See advantages and disadvantages of both. What would you choose?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 15:35:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Yet-another-gear-question-for-Africa-photo-safari/m-p/448285#M28734</guid>
      <dc:creator>glider4</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-29T15:35:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Yet another gear question for Africa photo safari</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Yet-another-gear-question-for-Africa-photo-safari/m-p/448286#M28735</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Since you have the longer focal lengths covered with your R5 setup, I would go with the RF 24-105mm f/4. &amp;nbsp;It would be the better optic and also a tad lighter than the 24-240. &amp;nbsp;Plus, the constant f/4 aperture.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 15:40:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Yet-another-gear-question-for-Africa-photo-safari/m-p/448286#M28735</guid>
      <dc:creator>rs-eos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-29T15:40:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Yet another gear question for Africa photo safari</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Yet-another-gear-question-for-Africa-photo-safari/m-p/448336#M28740</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yep, I agree with Ricky.&amp;nbsp; The 24-240 is a brilliant optic but it's not a constant aperture and that would be the clincher.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 19:57:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Yet-another-gear-question-for-Africa-photo-safari/m-p/448336#M28740</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tronhard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-29T19:57:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

