<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Lenses for Canon M50 in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Lenses-for-Canon-M50/m-p/437013#M27766</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Greetings,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since you already have the 15-45mm, the 55-200mm would provide the desired focal length you are seeking for portraits.&amp;nbsp; Note however this is a variable aperture lens f4.5~6.3.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Its MFD (minimum&amp;nbsp;focus distance) is 3.3ft.&amp;nbsp; This lens is capable of providing some level of background blur (bokeh) softness behind your subject but it will not be as dramatic as a lens that has a higher maximum aperture.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Another option would be to buy an adapter EF-M to EF/EF-S.&amp;nbsp; With this option, you could buy another lens with a higher maximum aperture.&amp;nbsp; Something like an EF 85mm f1.8.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For portraiture, this would give you a FOV (field of view) equivalent&amp;nbsp;of 135mm and f1.8.&amp;nbsp; Note the 85mm is a prime (fixed focal length), not a zoom.&amp;nbsp; This combination would give you a perfect portrait capable lens with a buttery soft background behind your subjects.&amp;nbsp; Note this configuration requires an adapter between the body and lens.&amp;nbsp; This is not a bad thing, but something you need to be aware of.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="shadowsports_0-1695084433521.png" style="width: 253px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/45207iD5D91FFE244F106D/image-dimensions/253x163?v=v2" width="253" height="163" role="button" title="shadowsports_0-1695084433521.png" alt="shadowsports_0-1695084433521.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could the 55~200 work for you.&amp;nbsp; It might.&amp;nbsp; It would depend on lighting, shooting conditions and the distance of the objects behind your subject.&amp;nbsp; I'd probably use a tripod for portraits in either case.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 00:56:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>shadowsports</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-09-19T00:56:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Lenses for Canon M50</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Lenses-for-Canon-M50/m-p/437009#M27765</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi! I’m looking to get a more professional lens (for portrait photography) for my Canon EOS M50. I currently have a 45mm lens for my camera and I’m looking at getting something like an 85mm lens. I am just looking for something easy to use - I do social media marketing and am looking for something more professional for my camera! Any recommendations?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2023 23:44:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Lenses-for-Canon-M50/m-p/437009#M27765</guid>
      <dc:creator>lojanoska</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-18T23:44:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lenses for Canon M50</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Lenses-for-Canon-M50/m-p/437013#M27766</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Greetings,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since you already have the 15-45mm, the 55-200mm would provide the desired focal length you are seeking for portraits.&amp;nbsp; Note however this is a variable aperture lens f4.5~6.3.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Its MFD (minimum&amp;nbsp;focus distance) is 3.3ft.&amp;nbsp; This lens is capable of providing some level of background blur (bokeh) softness behind your subject but it will not be as dramatic as a lens that has a higher maximum aperture.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Another option would be to buy an adapter EF-M to EF/EF-S.&amp;nbsp; With this option, you could buy another lens with a higher maximum aperture.&amp;nbsp; Something like an EF 85mm f1.8.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For portraiture, this would give you a FOV (field of view) equivalent&amp;nbsp;of 135mm and f1.8.&amp;nbsp; Note the 85mm is a prime (fixed focal length), not a zoom.&amp;nbsp; This combination would give you a perfect portrait capable lens with a buttery soft background behind your subjects.&amp;nbsp; Note this configuration requires an adapter between the body and lens.&amp;nbsp; This is not a bad thing, but something you need to be aware of.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="shadowsports_0-1695084433521.png" style="width: 253px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/45207iD5D91FFE244F106D/image-dimensions/253x163?v=v2" width="253" height="163" role="button" title="shadowsports_0-1695084433521.png" alt="shadowsports_0-1695084433521.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could the 55~200 work for you.&amp;nbsp; It might.&amp;nbsp; It would depend on lighting, shooting conditions and the distance of the objects behind your subject.&amp;nbsp; I'd probably use a tripod for portraits in either case.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 00:56:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Lenses-for-Canon-M50/m-p/437013#M27766</guid>
      <dc:creator>shadowsports</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-19T00:56:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lenses for Canon M50</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Lenses-for-Canon-M50/m-p/437032#M27767</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/224337"&gt;@lojanoska&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi! I’m looking to get a more professional lens (for portrait photography) for my Canon EOS M50. I currently have a 45mm lens for my camera and I’m looking at getting something like an 85mm lens. I am just looking for something easy to use - I do social media marketing and am looking for something more professional for my camera! Any recommendations?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Upgrade the camera to an R series body. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The M-Series of bodies are excellent camera bodies, capable of capturing tack sharp images. &amp;nbsp;But they are not the best choice for professional shooting. &amp;nbsp;They are great cameras for backyard family cookouts, but not so great for Fashion Week. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Canon EF-M lens selection is somewhat limited, but adequate for the casual, occasional photographer. &amp;nbsp;While the EF lenses can be adapted for use, their larger size and power drain tend to drain the camera battery very quickly. &amp;nbsp;You will want to carry spares for a professional shoot.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 04:09:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Lenses-for-Canon-M50/m-p/437032#M27767</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-19T04:09:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lenses for Canon M50</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Lenses-for-Canon-M50/m-p/437043#M27768</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Indeed.&amp;nbsp; I had forgotten about the limited capacity of the M series battery.&amp;nbsp; I suspect battery performance might be half of what you'd normally get using an adapted lens.&amp;nbsp; I'd be curious to know how it does.&amp;nbsp; I've not heard or seen posts from anyone who shoots with the adapter on the M series.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 12:05:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Lenses-for-Canon-M50/m-p/437043#M27768</guid>
      <dc:creator>shadowsports</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-19T12:05:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lenses for Canon M50</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Lenses-for-Canon-M50/m-p/437061#M27775</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/99879"&gt;@shadowsports&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Indeed.&amp;nbsp; I had forgotten about the limited capacity of the M series battery.&amp;nbsp; I suspect battery performance might be half of what you'd normally get using an adapted lens.&amp;nbsp; I'd be curious to know how it does.&amp;nbsp; I've not heard or seen posts from anyone who shoots with the adapter on the M series.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Adapted lenses work very well. &amp;nbsp;You’re just not going to get as many shots as you would with an EF/EF-S mount camera body. &amp;nbsp;The EF-M lenses are a good match for the bodies.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Depending on the camera model, you can expect 150-300 photos with the 15-45mm kit lens. &amp;nbsp;My M3 is older, so it is at the lower end of that scale. &amp;nbsp;I was getting about 50-100 photos with the EF-S 10-20mm before the battery dropped well below 50%, which is when AF slows down. &amp;nbsp;I started shooting with a Rokinon 14mm T3.1 and I could shoot all day, well over 300 stills.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Out of curiosity, I tried it with the Sigma 150-500mm. &amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;The model number is not a typo&lt;/EM&gt;. &amp;nbsp;I was only able to get around 50 shots before the battery was well under 50%.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I bought the EF-M 22mm f/2 STM, which is my one and only EF-M lens. &amp;nbsp;It’s makes the M3 the perfect pocket camera with a 35mm equivalent FL. &amp;nbsp;I can capture high quality images without looking like Joe “The Pro” Photographer in urban environments.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 14:01:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Lenses-for-Canon-M50/m-p/437061#M27775</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-19T14:01:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Lenses for Canon M50</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Lenses-for-Canon-M50/m-p/437081#M27781</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I get 100-180 shots per charge with my M50 Mark II, but a few of those are video and I use EF and EF-S lenses quite a bit, too. Also, I shoot in JPEG + C-RAW and I upload all my still photos directly from the camera to image.canon via WiFi, so that eats up some battery, too. If I were strictly shooting stills with EF-M lenses, I would expect to get well over 200 shots per charge.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 16:15:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Lenses-for-Canon-M50/m-p/437081#M27781</guid>
      <dc:creator>krahe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-19T16:15:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

