topic Re: Image Stabilized Lenses for the 5D Mark II Full-Frame? in EF & RF Lenses

Image Stabilized Lenses for the 5D Mark II Full-Frame?

stevefoobar — Sun, 19 Jan 2020 04:33:33 GMT

Hi Everyone,

For some reason, I'm having difficulty getting straight answers on the net about finding a list of image stablized lenses that would work with the Canon EOS 5D Mark II which has a full-frame sensor. I would like to get a list of both Canon and third-part lenses that are compatible (Sigma, Tokina, Tamron).

Maybe I'm missing something and maybe NO image stabilized lenses are compatible.

Can anyone point me in the right direction?

Thanks!

Re: Image Stabilized Lenses for the 5D Mark II Full-Frame?

Tronhard — Sun, 19 Jan 2020 05:55:25 GMT

How about this?

https://www.neocamera.com/list_lenses.php?mount=canon&crop=1

I am surprised that you would suggest that there are no IS lenses available for your 5dII. There are tons of them!!!

If you look at the link I sent you you can drill down to different parameters along the top selectors. I have already set the link to FF (i.e. EF lenses) which are what you want. Still, you might want to narrow down the search more with the top right selector to elimenate discontinued ones.

TO see if a lens is stabilized then look to the icons on the right side of the list. The first of those (with a lens and arrows) tells you if they are stabilized.

It's a big list, but you asked for it...

If this resolves your question, please click on the SOLVED icon for this thread so anyone knows there is an appropriate answer.

Re: Image Stabilized Lenses for the 5D Mark II Full-Frame?

RobertTheFat — Sun, 19 Jan 2020 06:01:05 GMT

@stevefoobar wrote:
Hi Everyone,

For some reason, I'm having difficulty getting straight answers on the net about finding a list of image stablized lenses that would work with the Canon EOS 5D Mark II which has a full-frame sensor. I would like to get a list of both Canon and third-part lenses that are compatible (Sigma, Tokina, Tamron).

Maybe I'm missing something and maybe NO image stabilized lenses are compatible.

Can anyone point me in the right direction?

Thanks!

You realize, I presume, that on any Canon DSLR, the image stabilization is entirely in the lens? So any Canon IS lens with an EF mount will work. The EF 24-105mm f/4 and the EF 70-200mm f/2.8 are two that I would unhesitatingly recommend.

Re: Image Stabilized Lenses for the 5D Mark II Full-Frame?

Tronhard — Sun, 19 Jan 2020 07:16:15 GMT

@RobertTheFat wrote:
@stevefoobar wrote:
Hi Everyone,

For some reason, I'm having difficulty getting straight answers on the net about finding a list of image stablized lenses that would work with the Canon EOS 5D Mark II which has a full-frame sensor. I would like to get a list of both Canon and third-part lenses that are compatible (Sigma, Tokina, Tamron).

Maybe I'm missing something and maybe NO image stabilized lenses are compatible.

Can anyone point me in the right direction?

Thanks!
You realize, I presume, that on any Canon DSLR, the image stabilization is entirely in the lens? So any Canon IS lens with an EF mount will work. The EF 24-105mm f/4 and the EF 70-200mm f/2.8 are two that I would unhesitatingly recommend.

Hi Bob

I think the OP is looking for EF lenses with IS... and of course lots of EF lenses don't have IS. He is also looking for non-Canon lenses so if that is what he wants, the list will be long - as you will see in my link.

Re: Image Stabilized Lenses for the 5D Mark II Full-Frame?

stevefoobar — Sun, 19 Jan 2020 07:30:46 GMT

Thanks for the tip. I wasn't sure any IS lens with an EF mount would work in a full-frame camera like the 5D Mark II. This helps.

Re: Image Stabilized Lenses for the 5D Mark II Full-Frame?

stevefoobar — Sun, 19 Jan 2020 07:31:17 GMT

Thanks! This list is very helpful, especially since you can filter by brand and IS as well.

Re: Image Stabilized Lenses for the 5D Mark II Full-Frame?

ebiggs1 — Mon, 20 Jan 2020 14:05:55 GMT

"...you can filter by brand and IS as well."

It does not, however, tell you whether the IS works as advertised. All IS is not created equal. If you are looking at only Canon lenses you can rest assured the IS at least works. Some 3rd party's IS can leave a lot to be desired. Some don't offer much stabilization at all.

Re: Image Stabilized Lenses for the 5D Mark II Full-Frame?

stevefoobar — Mon, 20 Jan 2020 18:42:28 GMT

That's really good to know. That obviously defeats the purpose. I have seen lenses claim the IS provides 3 stops of improvement in stability. Is that typical? Do you have any experience (or have read reports) of at least major brands like Tokina, Tamron, and Sigma at least being good and providing 3 stops?

I've never used an IS lens before on my Canon so this is all new to me.

Thanks!

Re: Image Stabilized Lenses for the 5D Mark II Full-Frame?

Tronhard — Mon, 20 Jan 2020 21:08:35 GMT

@stevefoobar wrote:
That's really good to know. That obviously defeats the purpose. I have seen lenses claim the IS provides 3 stops of improvement in stability. Is that typical? Do you have any experience (or have read reports) of at least major brands like Tokina, Tamron, and Sigma at least being good and providing 3 stops?

I've never used an IS lens before on my Canon so this is all new to me.

Thanks!

I recommend you check sites like DPREVIEW.COM, DXOMARK.COM, the digital picture and the digital picture.

Do a search...

At this point most modern stabilized lenses offer at least 3 stops of stabilization. Canon has lenses that offer 5 levels of IS. How desperately you depend on those depends on the type of photography you engage in and your technique. If you do video you want not only good IS but silent focusing and zooming for example. Long lenses require IS unless you are using a tripod, but many wide angle lenses do not have IS because it isn't necessary and would add expense and complextity.

In my personal experience Canon consistently provide the level of IS they claim, Sigma is a good brand too, particularly their Art and Sport lines. To me a good test of a lens is how it copes with being cropped.

This image was taken at a surf beach in the middle of a raging gale (it bowled over an elderly chap next to me), so stabilization was pushed to the limit as I hand-held my camera to get shots of the wind surfers, who were flying (often literally) about 400m away.

Details: EOS 5DIV, Sigma 150-600 Contemporary @ 520mm, f/8, 1/1000sec, ISO-200

I was able to crop this image to focus on the surfer with this result.

It's a tribute to the camera and lens that I was able to use the tech to overcome horrendous conditions and get some shots.

Re: Image Stabilized Lenses for the 5D Mark II Full-Frame?

ebiggs1 — Mon, 20 Jan 2020 21:40:10 GMT

"Do you have any experience (with) ... of at least major brands like Tokina, Tamron, and Sigma at least being good and providing 3 stops?"

Yes, I have owned and used all (brands, not necessarily every lens) of them. I have had well over a hundred+ lenses in my decades long photographic journey.

The very short answer to your 3-stop question is a flat, no. It doesn't really depend on brand as each brand has some good and some bad lenses.

"I recommend you check sites like DPREVIEW.COM, DXOMARK.COM,..."

I am OK with DPreview but I recommend to steer clear of DXO. Can't trust them.

"...most modern stabilized lenses offer at least 3 stops of stabilization."

I am going to add a little clarification to my friend's statement. The advertising department claims, "at least 3 stops of stabilization."

"This image was taken at a surf beach in the middle of a gale..., so stabilization was pushed to the limit ..."

Ok, now for the nitty gritty of IS. As my friend, that seems to get the most out of the least gear, I must point out this, IS works better for the better photographers. You see IS works best for anybody when you least need it. It works less as your need grows. What I mean, IS is varible. This is why the better you are at photography the better you will like and get help from IS. Correction at 1 stop is going to be better than correction at 5 stops. They are not the same.

You know the claim is usually "up to 3-stops of IS". Not you can expect 3-stops of IS. Perhaps you can and perhaps not. No doubt Canon's IS is one of, if not, the best there is.

And, the obivous bottom line, if you have a lens with great IS will you get every picture perfectly sharp? C'mon on now, you know better you won't.

Re: Image Stabilized Lenses for the 5D Mark II Full-Frame?

stevefoobar — Mon, 20 Jan 2020 22:32:40 GMT

Thanks for the advice. That all makes sense. That's a great image and a great use of IS!

Re: Image Stabilized Lenses for the 5D Mark II Full-Frame?

stevefoobar — Mon, 20 Jan 2020 22:34:08 GMT

Thanks. This makes sense too.

Re: Image Stabilized Lenses for the 5D Mark II Full-Frame?

Tronhard — Mon, 20 Jan 2020 23:10:48 GMT

This takes me back to a discussion that I am currently having on another forum:

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1512636

An effective image is made by the photographer, not the technology. The tech will improve your reach, and may inrease your hit rate, but in the end it's your mastery of the holy trinity of exposure: ISO, shutter speed and aperture; plus a study of composition that is never ending.

Don't get me wrong, I love the technology - heaven knows my gear list attests to that, but I have never subscribed to the theory that better equipment will make me a better photographer. Every time it's tech over technique, despite what camera equipment makers would woo us with.

Certainly a super telephoto lense like that 150-600 made it possible to get that shot, but I could have turned off the IS and put the lens on a tripod or monopod and likely got a few good shots. I shoot hand-held almost all the time, but I do weight training specifically to ensure I have the strength and motor skills to hold a heavy camera and lens.