<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: EF-R Adapter as Macro? in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EF-R-Adapter-as-Macro/m-p/291742#M2609</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/129944"&gt;@KennyRay&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;I recently purchased a EOS RP so also got a couple EF-R adapters for my EF lenses. Does anyone know if the extra space between the lens and body using these adapters offers any macro advantages?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;The EF-R adapters are not a substitute for extension tubes. &amp;nbsp;Why didn't you just simply try it and see for yourself?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The adapters serve two purposes. &amp;nbsp;First, the adapters makes an electronic connection between the lens and the camera body. &amp;nbsp;The second purpose is provide the correct flange distance between the lens and the sensor. &amp;nbsp;The EF lenses have a much longer flange distance than RF lenses.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 19:22:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-01-03T19:22:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EF-R Adapter as Macro?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EF-R-Adapter-as-Macro/m-p/291733#M2608</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I recently purchased a EOS RP so also got a couple EF-R adapters for my EF lenses. Does anyone know if the extra space between the lens and body using these adapters offers any macro advantages?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 17:43:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EF-R-Adapter-as-Macro/m-p/291733#M2608</guid>
      <dc:creator>KennyRay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-03T17:43:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EF-R Adapter as Macro?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EF-R-Adapter-as-Macro/m-p/291742#M2609</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/129944"&gt;@KennyRay&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;I recently purchased a EOS RP so also got a couple EF-R adapters for my EF lenses. Does anyone know if the extra space between the lens and body using these adapters offers any macro advantages?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;The EF-R adapters are not a substitute for extension tubes. &amp;nbsp;Why didn't you just simply try it and see for yourself?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The adapters serve two purposes. &amp;nbsp;First, the adapters makes an electronic connection between the lens and the camera body. &amp;nbsp;The second purpose is provide the correct flange distance between the lens and the sensor. &amp;nbsp;The EF lenses have a much longer flange distance than RF lenses.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 19:22:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EF-R-Adapter-as-Macro/m-p/291742#M2609</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-03T19:22:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EF-R Adapter as Macro?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EF-R-Adapter-as-Macro/m-p/291756#M2610</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks, Waddizzle.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As for trying it myself, I'm not sure of the difference in image size or distance with and w/out the adaptor, particularly for the 100-400 EF lens, so am not sure how to compare since I can't shoot w/out the adapter on this body. My question was mostly curiosity, since a macro extension tube is basically used to increase distince between the lense and sensor.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 20:16:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EF-R-Adapter-as-Macro/m-p/291756#M2610</guid>
      <dc:creator>KennyRay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-03T20:16:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EF-R Adapter as Macro?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EF-R-Adapter-as-Macro/m-p/291760#M2611</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No, all it does is put the plane of the lens where it would be if there was a mirror box.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 20:40:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EF-R-Adapter-as-Macro/m-p/291760#M2611</guid>
      <dc:creator>kvbarkley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-03T20:40:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EF-R Adapter as Macro?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EF-R-Adapter-as-Macro/m-p/291771#M2612</link>
      <description>That makes sense, thanks!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 22:03:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EF-R-Adapter-as-Macro/m-p/291771#M2612</guid>
      <dc:creator>KennyRay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-03T22:03:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

