<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Buying the EF 400 f/2.8 IS III? in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Buying-the-EF-400-f-2-8-IS-III/m-p/333223#M2240</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"What i think is a deal breaker for me is the weight (approx 2,8kg) and the f/2.8 + IS."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The twelve grand price tag is not a deal breaker?&amp;nbsp; I would certainly make darn sure this is the lens&amp;nbsp;for me. You need way more than a casual, I think I want&amp;nbsp;this lens. Now that's just me but perhaps you should rent one first.&amp;nbsp; Unless money is no object to you.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 16:13:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-02-02T16:13:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Buying the EF 400 f/2.8 IS III?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Buying-the-EF-400-f-2-8-IS-III/m-p/333220#M2238</link>
      <description>&lt;P class="_1qeIAgB0cPwnLhDF9XSiJM"&gt;I don't own any "super tele" lens. I have the EF 70-200 f/2.8 III and a Canon 2x extender but I'm not that satisfied with the image quality and the depth of field with that combination.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="_1qeIAgB0cPwnLhDF9XSiJM"&gt;Are there any people here owning this lens or are there other options with a 3:RD part. lens?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="_1qeIAgB0cPwnLhDF9XSiJM"&gt;What i think is a deal breaker for me is the weight (approx 2,8kg) and the f/2.8 + IS. Have looked on the DO 400 lens but thats f/4 only and I don't know if it has IS.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 15:26:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Buying-the-EF-400-f-2-8-IS-III/m-p/333220#M2238</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlessioDidier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-02T15:26:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Buying the EF 400 f/2.8 IS III?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Buying-the-EF-400-f-2-8-IS-III/m-p/333222#M2239</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I own the IS II version of the 400 f2.8 and it is my favorite tele lens.&amp;nbsp; It is heavier than the version III but I shoot with it handheld for football and soccer.&amp;nbsp; With a 1DX series body, the lens balances quite well and it should be even easier with the lighter version III which should also have better balance.&amp;nbsp; A lot of people use a monopod with this lens but I shoot with two bodies and like the mobility and rapid change between bodies (typically the 400 f2.8 on a 1DX III and the 70-200 f2.8 on a 1DX II) that comes from using them with a dual camera harness without a monopod.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The 400 f2.8 produces beautiful images with very fast focus and for those situations where you need a little more reach and f4 is acceptable, it works very well with the 1.4X extender and still retains very fast focus and tracking ability.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have never shot with the f4 DO lens, it is far lighter and less expensive but the "great white" telephotos are in a class by themselves.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rodger&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 15:55:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Buying-the-EF-400-f-2-8-IS-III/m-p/333222#M2239</guid>
      <dc:creator>wq9nsc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-02T15:55:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Buying the EF 400 f/2.8 IS III?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Buying-the-EF-400-f-2-8-IS-III/m-p/333223#M2240</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"What i think is a deal breaker for me is the weight (approx 2,8kg) and the f/2.8 + IS."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The twelve grand price tag is not a deal breaker?&amp;nbsp; I would certainly make darn sure this is the lens&amp;nbsp;for me. You need way more than a casual, I think I want&amp;nbsp;this lens. Now that's just me but perhaps you should rent one first.&amp;nbsp; Unless money is no object to you.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 16:13:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Buying-the-EF-400-f-2-8-IS-III/m-p/333223#M2240</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-02T16:13:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Buying the EF 400 f/2.8 IS III?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Buying-the-EF-400-f-2-8-IS-III/m-p/334276#M2241</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The 400 f4 DO indeed has IS.&amp;nbsp; It is also white in color.&amp;nbsp; I'm getting great images with it, incredibly sharp, and its reduced weight and size are a real plus. I don't find myself wishing I had a wider lens; the f4 is more than enough for the work I'm doing.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2021 18:50:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Buying-the-EF-400-f-2-8-IS-III/m-p/334276#M2241</guid>
      <dc:creator>jsfarnsw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-12T18:50:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

