<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Question about lens for video vs photo in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Question-about-lens-for-video-vs-photo/m-p/333390#M2237</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;"versitile" is relative. &amp;nbsp;The 18-55 will give you a range of focal lengths (field-of-views, framings). &amp;nbsp;And, is has IS!. &amp;nbsp;But yes, the aperture is small as well as variable. &amp;nbsp;f/4 at 18mm, then f/5.6 at 55mm (varies in between). &amp;nbsp; When using variable-aperture lenses for video, I just keep it at the minimum aperature that covers the full range (f/5.6 in this example).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The f/1.8 will let in over 8 times the light as the zoom lens (zoom at f/5.6). &amp;nbsp; But this 50mm is just a single focal length, so your field-of-view will be constant. &amp;nbsp;And, no IS with this lens.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Having said that, the answer oftens lies in both. &amp;nbsp;Each has their strengths. &amp;nbsp;When doing low-light, the f/1.8 will really help. &amp;nbsp;3 stops of light can mean less noise by 3 stops; that can be huge (e.g. reducing from ISO 12800 down to 1600). &amp;nbsp; And when doing outdoor work, the narrow apertures and versatility of the zoom will be good. &amp;nbsp; And IS can be incredibly useful for video work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 12:52:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rs-eos</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-02-04T12:52:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Question about lens for video vs photo</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Question-about-lens-for-video-vs-photo/m-p/333181#M2236</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="_3xX726aBn29LDbsDtzr_6E _1Ap4F5maDtT1E1YuCiaO0r D3IL3FD0RFy_mkKLPwL4"&gt;&lt;DIV class="_292iotee39Lmt0MkQZ2hPV RichTextJSON-root"&gt;&lt;P class="_1qeIAgB0cPwnLhDF9XSiJM"&gt;Hey all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="_1qeIAgB0cPwnLhDF9XSiJM"&gt;I managed to cop a rebel SL1 off of ebay along with the 18-55mm kit lens a while back. And now, I bought the "nifty fifty" 50mm 1.8. I've been having fun shooting with it but I want to get more into the video aspect as well. My main question is - between the two lenses that I currently have, would the 50mm be the better of the 2 for filming? Since it's a much faster lens I assumed it would be more versatile for filming. The 18-55mm only drops down to f/4 I think, or f/4.5&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="_1qeIAgB0cPwnLhDF9XSiJM"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="_1qeIAgB0cPwnLhDF9XSiJM"&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 06:04:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Question-about-lens-for-video-vs-photo/m-p/333181#M2236</guid>
      <dc:creator>tinagrims87</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-02T06:04:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about lens for video vs photo</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Question-about-lens-for-video-vs-photo/m-p/333390#M2237</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;"versitile" is relative. &amp;nbsp;The 18-55 will give you a range of focal lengths (field-of-views, framings). &amp;nbsp;And, is has IS!. &amp;nbsp;But yes, the aperture is small as well as variable. &amp;nbsp;f/4 at 18mm, then f/5.6 at 55mm (varies in between). &amp;nbsp; When using variable-aperture lenses for video, I just keep it at the minimum aperature that covers the full range (f/5.6 in this example).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The f/1.8 will let in over 8 times the light as the zoom lens (zoom at f/5.6). &amp;nbsp; But this 50mm is just a single focal length, so your field-of-view will be constant. &amp;nbsp;And, no IS with this lens.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Having said that, the answer oftens lies in both. &amp;nbsp;Each has their strengths. &amp;nbsp;When doing low-light, the f/1.8 will really help. &amp;nbsp;3 stops of light can mean less noise by 3 stops; that can be huge (e.g. reducing from ISO 12800 down to 1600). &amp;nbsp; And when doing outdoor work, the narrow apertures and versatility of the zoom will be good. &amp;nbsp; And IS can be incredibly useful for video work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 12:52:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Question-about-lens-for-video-vs-photo/m-p/333390#M2237</guid>
      <dc:creator>rs-eos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-04T12:52:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

