<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: DOF and the use of extenders in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/DOF-and-the-use-of-extenders/m-p/31497#M21580</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Again, I'm aware of that (f/2.8 + 1.4X = f/4).&amp;nbsp; I have answered your questions several times; perhaps you could work on your reading comprehension - and tact, while you're at it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The example you posted in your second post is poorly stated, hence I explained myself instead of simply answering - you're comparing a 400 mm @ f/4 to an effective 560mm @ effective f/4.&amp;nbsp; Technically speaking, the depth of field are practically the same - but not exactly - if you move back with the 560mm to get the same magnification factor.&amp;nbsp; But we could discuss a couple pages on that topic alone - actually, 100s of pages with how slow you are.&amp;nbsp; So I left it simple.&amp;nbsp; A 400mm at f/2.8 with a 1.4X will behave exactly as a 560mm @ f/4 would with regard to depth of field.&amp;nbsp; Why is that so hard to understand?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:04:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Skirball</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-06-25T18:04:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DOF and the use of extenders</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/DOF-and-the-use-of-extenders/m-p/31409#M21573</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If i shoot my 400 mm f 2.8 at f 4, adding a 1.4X makes it an f 4. &amp;nbsp;Is the depth of field the same with and without the extender at f 4?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 12:42:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/DOF-and-the-use-of-extenders/m-p/31409#M21573</guid>
      <dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-25T12:42:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DOF and the use of extenders</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/DOF-and-the-use-of-extenders/m-p/31431#M21574</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you shoot your lens at f/4 with the 1.4, it will be effectively f/5.6.&amp;nbsp; The lens will behave exactly as a 560mm f/5.6 would behave, as far as DoF is concerned.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Edit: Note that I was careful not to mention that technically focal length doesn't affect DoF, to avoid that whole argument for the 1000th time.&amp;nbsp; Oops, there I go again...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 15:04:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/DOF-and-the-use-of-extenders/m-p/31431#M21574</guid>
      <dc:creator>Skirball</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-25T15:04:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DOF and the use of extenders</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/DOF-and-the-use-of-extenders/m-p/31455#M21575</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;IF I SHOOT THE 400 MM &amp;nbsp;F 2.8 WITH A 1.4X IT BECOMES AN F4; NOT AN F 5.6. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MAYBE REWORDING MY QUESTION AS FOLLOWS WILL CLARIFY:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A. &amp;nbsp;IF I SET MY 400 MM F 2.8 AT F4 THE DOF WILL BE X.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;B. &amp;nbsp;IF I USE THE 1.4X WITH THE 400 MM AT F 2.8 IT BECOMES AND F4 AND THE DOF WILL BE ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WILL THE DOF IN SITUATIONS A AND B ABOVE WILL BE THE SAME OR DIFFERENT?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 15:57:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/DOF-and-the-use-of-extenders/m-p/31455#M21575</guid>
      <dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-25T15:57:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DOF and the use of extenders</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/DOF-and-the-use-of-extenders/m-p/31467#M21576</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm well aware of that.&amp;nbsp; Funny how people asking for other's advice are frequently so strident in response. Perhaps you should re-read what you said in your first post:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"If i shoot my 400 mm f 2.8 at f 4, adding a 1.4X makes it an f 4."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you shoot a 400 mm f/2.8 &lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;AT&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt; f/4 - implies that you moved your aperture to f/4.&amp;nbsp; Adding a 1.4X will make it f/5.6.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I get what you're trying to say (after your second post), but that's not what you said originally.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you simply read my post instead of fly off the handle that you don't think you got the response you want, you'll see that I answered your question regardless of which aperture you select.&amp;nbsp; The lens with extender will behave as the effective focal length and focal ratio after multiplication.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:57:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/DOF-and-the-use-of-extenders/m-p/31467#M21576</guid>
      <dc:creator>Skirball</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-25T17:57:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DOF and the use of extenders</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/DOF-and-the-use-of-extenders/m-p/31483#M21577</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;1.4 EXTENDER TIMES F2.8 LENS APERTURE WIDE OPEN= F 4 (3.92 TO BE EXACT) &amp;nbsp;NOT 5.6. &amp;nbsp;SO THE LENS BECOMES AN F4 WHEN USING THE 1.4X EXTENDER.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;THE QUESTION IS IF THE THE LENS PROVIDES THE SAME DOF WITH OR WITHOUT THE USE OF THE EXTENDER?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:29:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/DOF-and-the-use-of-extenders/m-p/31483#M21577</guid>
      <dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-25T17:29:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DOF and the use of extenders</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/DOF-and-the-use-of-extenders/m-p/31495#M21579</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Edward!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please remember to avoid using ALL CAPS per the &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://pages.citebite.com/o1y8q1q4b4jbl"&gt;Forum Guidelines&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:00:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/DOF-and-the-use-of-extenders/m-p/31495#M21579</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-25T18:00:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DOF and the use of extenders</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/DOF-and-the-use-of-extenders/m-p/31497#M21580</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Again, I'm aware of that (f/2.8 + 1.4X = f/4).&amp;nbsp; I have answered your questions several times; perhaps you could work on your reading comprehension - and tact, while you're at it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The example you posted in your second post is poorly stated, hence I explained myself instead of simply answering - you're comparing a 400 mm @ f/4 to an effective 560mm @ effective f/4.&amp;nbsp; Technically speaking, the depth of field are practically the same - but not exactly - if you move back with the 560mm to get the same magnification factor.&amp;nbsp; But we could discuss a couple pages on that topic alone - actually, 100s of pages with how slow you are.&amp;nbsp; So I left it simple.&amp;nbsp; A 400mm at f/2.8 with a 1.4X will behave exactly as a 560mm @ f/4 would with regard to depth of field.&amp;nbsp; Why is that so hard to understand?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:04:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/DOF-and-the-use-of-extenders/m-p/31497#M21580</guid>
      <dc:creator>Skirball</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-25T18:04:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DOF and the use of extenders</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/DOF-and-the-use-of-extenders/m-p/31501#M21581</link>
      <description>Skirball is correct, but here a quick run down using a quick DOF calculator, full frame camera, object distance 100ft&lt;BR /&gt;400mm @ F2.8 DOF ~ 3.37ft&lt;BR /&gt;400mm @ F4 DOF ~ 4.82ft&lt;BR /&gt;400mm @ F2.8 + 1.4x extender = 560mm @ F4 ~ 2.44ft&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:44:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/DOF-and-the-use-of-extenders/m-p/31501#M21581</guid>
      <dc:creator>hsbn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-25T18:44:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DOF and the use of extenders</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/DOF-and-the-use-of-extenders/m-p/31509#M21582</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/10239"&gt;@hsbn&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Skirball is correct, but here a quick run down using a quick DOF calculator, full frame camera, object distance 100ft&lt;BR /&gt;@400mm @ F2.8 DOF ~ 3.37ft&lt;BR /&gt;@400mm @ F4 DOF ~ 4.82ft&lt;BR /&gt;@400mm @ F2.8 + 1.4x extender = 560mm @ F4 ~ 2.44ft&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;@And 400mm @ f2.8 + 1.4x extender @ 140 feet to object (same magnification ratio): 4.81 ft&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 19:34:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/DOF-and-the-use-of-extenders/m-p/31509#M21582</guid>
      <dc:creator>Skirball</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-25T19:34:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DOF and the use of extenders</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/DOF-and-the-use-of-extenders/m-p/31647#M21583</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Edward the confusing part of this is the words used. Just like using a certain lens on a crop camera does not change the focal length of that lens. Adding a tele extender does not change the focal length of that lens.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The thing that does change is the angle of acceptance. &amp;nbsp;The focal point of that lens does not change and can not change.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also any time you increase the length of the lens tube, you will sacrifice some f-stop value.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Adding the 1.4x to your 400mm lens dose not turn it into a 560mm lens. It only gives you the angle of acceptance of a 560mm lens. It will behave similarly (effectively) to a 560mm lens with the f-stop penalty added.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 21:14:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/DOF-and-the-use-of-extenders/m-p/31647#M21583</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-26T21:14:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DOF and the use of extenders</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/DOF-and-the-use-of-extenders/m-p/31715#M21584</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The discussion was entirely on effective aperture and DoF, there wasn't any confusion on focal length.&amp;nbsp; As you say, a lens with an extender will give you the same field of view as the effective focal length, in other words, to an external observer it will act exactly as a 560mm lens (IQ issues aside)...&amp;nbsp; so why muddy the waters further with an issue of semantics that has absolutely no impact to the discussion?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:03:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/DOF-and-the-use-of-extenders/m-p/31715#M21584</guid>
      <dc:creator>Skirball</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-27T15:03:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DOF and the use of extenders</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/DOF-and-the-use-of-extenders/m-p/31719#M21585</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Get up on the wrong side of the bed again?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Actually you can answer a query the way you like to and I will answer the way I like to, If that pains you so much, please, don't read&amp;nbsp;mine. They don't concern you.&lt;img id="smileyindifferent" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyindifferent" src="https://community.usa.canon.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-indifferent.png" alt="Smiley Indifferent" title="Smiley Indifferent" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:46:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/DOF-and-the-use-of-extenders/m-p/31719#M21585</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-06-27T15:46:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

