<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Compact Lenses for SL1 in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Compact-Lenses-for-SL1/m-p/23321#M21202</link>
    <description>I see the SL1 camera as promising if sufficient compact EFS lenses are developed. Personally I would like a 22mm and 65mm lenses along with a 22-85mm zoom.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 00:15:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mls13</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-08T00:15:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Compact Lenses for SL1</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Compact-Lenses-for-SL1/m-p/23321#M21202</link>
      <description>I see the SL1 camera as promising if sufficient compact EFS lenses are developed. Personally I would like a 22mm and 65mm lenses along with a 22-85mm zoom.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 00:15:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Compact-Lenses-for-SL1/m-p/23321#M21202</guid>
      <dc:creator>mls13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-08T00:15:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Compact Lenses for SL1</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Compact-Lenses-for-SL1/m-p/23467#M21203</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Well you're not going to get any more compact then the STM Primes.&amp;nbsp; The 22 and the 40 both look tiny. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If you need more reach then you'll need to get bigger, at least for the moment.&amp;nbsp; The 50/1.8 and 60/2.8 are still pretty small.&amp;nbsp; Zooms are always going to be bigger.&amp;nbsp; And naturally, so are longer focal lengths.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 21:06:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Compact-Lenses-for-SL1/m-p/23467#M21203</guid>
      <dc:creator>Skirball</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-08T21:06:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Compact Lenses for SL1</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Compact-Lenses-for-SL1/m-p/23511#M21204</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/9659"&gt;@Skirball&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well you're not going to get any more compact then the STM Primes.&amp;nbsp; The 22 and the 40 both look tiny. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If you need more reach then you'll need to get bigger, at least for the moment.&amp;nbsp; The 50/1.8 and 60/2.8 are still pretty small.&amp;nbsp; Zooms are always going to be bigger.&amp;nbsp; And naturally, so are longer focal lengths.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Of course, you can't use the EF-M 22mm with the SL1. What is needed is an EF-S 22mm pancake. That with the EF 40mm STM would be really nice.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 15:52:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Compact-Lenses-for-SL1/m-p/23511#M21204</guid>
      <dc:creator>trulandphoto</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-09T15:52:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

