<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IS vs IS II? 55-250 vs 75-300? in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/IS-vs-IS-II-55-250-vs-75-300/m-p/21765#M21141</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The II means that it's the second version of the lens, not related to the IS specifically.&amp;nbsp; A quick look online suggests that the Mark II version is another case of Canon peddling the same old sh!t with a pretty new bow (see also: the 700D).&amp;nbsp; I don't see a single performance increase mentioned.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That said, I had the Mark I version and used it for many years, and it was fine.&amp;nbsp; It's not some amazing lens, but as you said, you get what you pay for.&amp;nbsp; I can't speak to the 75-300 from personal use.&amp;nbsp; Looks like the IQ is about the same.&amp;nbsp; The 55-250 is smaller and lighter and won't leave a gap for you between 55 and 75.&amp;nbsp; The 250 also has a closer minimum focus distance.&amp;nbsp; Obviously the 300 gives a bit more reach.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:06:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Skirball</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-25T15:06:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IS vs IS II? 55-250 vs 75-300?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/IS-vs-IS-II-55-250-vs-75-300/m-p/21755#M21140</link>
      <description>I'm looking at adding the next lense. Currently have t3i with the 18-55 kit lens. I'm just a hobby photog and want more reach. I was ready to buy a EF-S 55-250 but it is listed w IS and others are IS II for a few dollars more. Also looked at some 75-300 but some folks aren't too impressed with them. Looking to stay under 250 bucks. The 55-250 that does is IS can be bought for about 150 dollars. I know you get what you pay for but I'm just starting out and if I progress beyond my current hardware I will probably keep it anyway or pass it along to the daughter and family.&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 12:48:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/IS-vs-IS-II-55-250-vs-75-300/m-p/21755#M21140</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kingcreek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-25T12:48:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IS vs IS II? 55-250 vs 75-300?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/IS-vs-IS-II-55-250-vs-75-300/m-p/21765#M21141</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The II means that it's the second version of the lens, not related to the IS specifically.&amp;nbsp; A quick look online suggests that the Mark II version is another case of Canon peddling the same old sh!t with a pretty new bow (see also: the 700D).&amp;nbsp; I don't see a single performance increase mentioned.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That said, I had the Mark I version and used it for many years, and it was fine.&amp;nbsp; It's not some amazing lens, but as you said, you get what you pay for.&amp;nbsp; I can't speak to the 75-300 from personal use.&amp;nbsp; Looks like the IQ is about the same.&amp;nbsp; The 55-250 is smaller and lighter and won't leave a gap for you between 55 and 75.&amp;nbsp; The 250 also has a closer minimum focus distance.&amp;nbsp; Obviously the 300 gives a bit more reach.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:06:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/IS-vs-IS-II-55-250-vs-75-300/m-p/21765#M21141</guid>
      <dc:creator>Skirball</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-25T15:06:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IS vs IS II? 55-250 vs 75-300?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/IS-vs-IS-II-55-250-vs-75-300/m-p/21785#M21142</link>
      <description>Thanks. I am finding these advertised online with atleast 3-4 different part numbers and some sellers just copy and paste so I don't really know if thats even accurate.&lt;BR /&gt;So is it fair to say any new in box w warranty 55-250mm is essentially the same? Cost is in the 160-170$ range for new&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:06:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/IS-vs-IS-II-55-250-vs-75-300/m-p/21785#M21142</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kingcreek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-25T17:06:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IS vs IS II? 55-250 vs 75-300?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/IS-vs-IS-II-55-250-vs-75-300/m-p/22187#M21143</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Kingcreek,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As long as you purchase your lens &lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;new&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt; from an authorized dealer (keep your receipt) in the United States or Canada, your lens has a one year limited warranty.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 21:56:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/IS-vs-IS-II-55-250-vs-75-300/m-p/22187#M21143</guid>
      <dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-29T21:56:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

