<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Better Lens in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Better-Lens/m-p/17255#M20943</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Not even a prime for that amount. You need to think about adding another zero.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:39:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-13T12:39:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Better Lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Better-Lens/m-p/17141#M20941</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Need a better lens that can zoom images from at least half a kilometer but cost not more than $300. My camera is Canon Rebel t3&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:33:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Better-Lens/m-p/17141#M20941</guid>
      <dc:creator>Inedu-images</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-12T15:33:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better Lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Better-Lens/m-p/17159#M20942</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You'll need a much bigger budget than that. No such lens exists in that price range that can do that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:02:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Better-Lens/m-p/17159#M20942</guid>
      <dc:creator>cicopo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-12T18:02:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better Lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Better-Lens/m-p/17255#M20943</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not even a prime for that amount. You need to think about adding another zero.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 12:39:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Better-Lens/m-p/17255#M20943</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-13T12:39:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better Lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Better-Lens/m-p/17299#M20944</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I agree with the others as to your budget is a bit too low for a "better" lens. I purchased the canon 100-400 last year after saving a couple of years and it is so worth the investment. I had the Canon 100-300 and was unhappy with it. The 100-400 is well worth investing in. I also got the 2X converter III and love it as well though it takes a steadt tripod and manual focus.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:13:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Better-Lens/m-p/17299#M20944</guid>
      <dc:creator>Architect</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-13T17:13:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better Lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Better-Lens/m-p/18105#M20945</link>
      <description>Thanks guys. i appreciate your contributions. i will find out the prices. And if any one can give me an idea of the cost, i will be happy.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:41:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Better-Lens/m-p/18105#M20945</guid>
      <dc:creator>Inedu-images</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-21T12:41:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better Lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Better-Lens/m-p/18119#M20946</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;"Need a better lens that can zoom images from at least half a kilometer..."&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What are the "images"? &amp;nbsp; If is is a mountain, it is quit different than a bird at 1/2 a kilometer!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;My suggestion is the 100-400mm f4.5-5.6 L but a bird at 1/2 kilometer is stillgoing to be pretty small.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:59:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Better-Lens/m-p/18119#M20946</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-21T14:59:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Better Lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Better-Lens/m-p/18155#M20947</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Photo mags have prices. 100-400 about $1,600.00 USD I believe. There are sales as well at times.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:47:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Better-Lens/m-p/18155#M20947</guid>
      <dc:creator>Architect</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-21T20:47:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

