<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Canon 70-200mm lens with a Canon Extender EF 2X III versus Canon 100-400mm lens in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Canon-70-200mm-lens-with-a-Canon-Extender-EF-2X-III-versus-Canon/m-p/13847#M20783</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4123"&gt;@JMR66&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which is better for astrophotography,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;a Canon 70-200mm lens with a Canon Extender EF 2X III or Canon 100-400mm lens&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you refer to &lt;STRONG&gt;Canon 70-200mm &lt;U&gt;2.8L IS II&lt;/U&gt; USM&lt;/STRONG&gt; + Extender 2x III, then you'd get f/5.6 all over the focal length range vs. the &lt;STRONG&gt;EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS USM&lt;/STRONG&gt; (meaning you'll get a bit more of light at the short telephoto end when using the 100-400)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both combinations are very sharp, but I think the 100-400 is a &lt;U&gt;bit&lt;/U&gt; sharper when compared to 70-200 2.8L II &lt;U&gt;+ extender 2x III&lt;/U&gt;, noticeable if you use full frame DSLRs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you use APS-C DSLRs, then I'd suggest going for the &lt;STRONG&gt;70-200 2.8L IS II USM&lt;/STRONG&gt; because you'll get more than 1 f-stops of light if you shoot from 70 to 200mm (without the Extender 2x III) compared to the 100-400, and the sharpness is really amazing (better than 100-400 in both Full Frame and APS-C cameras)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 01:07:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>HDCamTeam</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-02-08T01:07:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Canon 70-200mm lens with a Canon Extender EF 2X III versus Canon 100-400mm lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Canon-70-200mm-lens-with-a-Canon-Extender-EF-2X-III-versus-Canon/m-p/13603#M20782</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Which is better for astrophotography,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;a Canon 70-200mm lens with a Canon Extender EF 2X III or Canon 100-400mm lens&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 03:06:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Canon-70-200mm-lens-with-a-Canon-Extender-EF-2X-III-versus-Canon/m-p/13603#M20782</guid>
      <dc:creator>JMR66</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-06T03:06:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Canon 70-200mm lens with a Canon Extender EF 2X III versus Canon 100-400mm lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Canon-70-200mm-lens-with-a-Canon-Extender-EF-2X-III-versus-Canon/m-p/13847#M20783</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4123"&gt;@JMR66&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which is better for astrophotography,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;a Canon 70-200mm lens with a Canon Extender EF 2X III or Canon 100-400mm lens&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you refer to &lt;STRONG&gt;Canon 70-200mm &lt;U&gt;2.8L IS II&lt;/U&gt; USM&lt;/STRONG&gt; + Extender 2x III, then you'd get f/5.6 all over the focal length range vs. the &lt;STRONG&gt;EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6L IS USM&lt;/STRONG&gt; (meaning you'll get a bit more of light at the short telephoto end when using the 100-400)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both combinations are very sharp, but I think the 100-400 is a &lt;U&gt;bit&lt;/U&gt; sharper when compared to 70-200 2.8L II &lt;U&gt;+ extender 2x III&lt;/U&gt;, noticeable if you use full frame DSLRs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you use APS-C DSLRs, then I'd suggest going for the &lt;STRONG&gt;70-200 2.8L IS II USM&lt;/STRONG&gt; because you'll get more than 1 f-stops of light if you shoot from 70 to 200mm (without the Extender 2x III) compared to the 100-400, and the sharpness is really amazing (better than 100-400 in both Full Frame and APS-C cameras)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 01:07:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Canon-70-200mm-lens-with-a-Canon-Extender-EF-2X-III-versus-Canon/m-p/13847#M20783</guid>
      <dc:creator>HDCamTeam</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-02-08T01:07:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

