<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Super Macro Question in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Super-Macro-Question/m-p/220978#M20200</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;First&amp;nbsp;if you are&amp;nbsp;serious about macro, close-up, photography this isn’t the best solution. There are reasons that lenses are engineered specifically&amp;nbsp;the way they are.&amp;nbsp; Converting them to what they are not designed for is not the best choice.&amp;nbsp; Plus&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;leaving the lens on in reverse can potentially let dust inside your lens.&amp;nbsp; You lose any auto feature of the camera.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Large apertures get a very narrow DOF. The smallest shift in your camera position changes what is in focus. It’s extremely difficult to hold the camera steady enough to get consistent shots.&amp;nbsp; You need a good tripod and lots of light.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 14:31:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-10-03T14:31:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Super Macro Question</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Super-Macro-Question/m-p/220838#M20198</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm still pretty new to photography. I have a 50D body and want to do macro. I have the 100mm f2.8 USM lens and want to reverse mount my 50mm f1.8 STM lens to it for super macro. Is this a decent rig to try as I read recently that using two 50mm lenses is the way to go? Any input for a newbie for super macro rigs or macro photography in general? I mostly shoot insects and plants. My male male conversion ring for the reverse mount is still in the mail so have not yet tried it. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2017 00:15:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Super-Macro-Question/m-p/220838#M20198</guid>
      <dc:creator>BigFish333</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-02T00:15:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Super Macro Question</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Super-Macro-Question/m-p/220843#M20199</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/98088"&gt;@BigFish333&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm still pretty new to photography. I have a 50D body and want to do macro. I have the 100mm f2.8 USM lens and want to reverse mount my 50mm f1.8 STM lens to it for super macro. Is this a decent rig to try as I read recently that using two 50mm lenses is the way to go? Any input for a newbie for super macro rigs or macro photography in general? I mostly shoot insects and plants. My male male conversion ring for the reverse mount is still in the mail so have not yet tried it. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would recommend buying a set of extension tubes, as a cheaper simpler alternative especially set that retains auto-focus.&amp;nbsp; I have never used a reverse mount, because it seems to me that you must dedicate a lens for that express purpose. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2017 01:32:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Super-Macro-Question/m-p/220843#M20199</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-02T01:32:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Super Macro Question</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Super-Macro-Question/m-p/220978#M20200</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;First&amp;nbsp;if you are&amp;nbsp;serious about macro, close-up, photography this isn’t the best solution. There are reasons that lenses are engineered specifically&amp;nbsp;the way they are.&amp;nbsp; Converting them to what they are not designed for is not the best choice.&amp;nbsp; Plus&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;leaving the lens on in reverse can potentially let dust inside your lens.&amp;nbsp; You lose any auto feature of the camera.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Large apertures get a very narrow DOF. The smallest shift in your camera position changes what is in focus. It’s extremely difficult to hold the camera steady enough to get consistent shots.&amp;nbsp; You need a good tripod and lots of light.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 14:31:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Super-Macro-Question/m-p/220978#M20200</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-03T14:31:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

