<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Extender 2xiii in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Extender-2xiii/m-p/49071#M19163</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Very interesting....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With my 1.4X ii I get an "effective" 420mm using it on a 300mm lens and an "effective" 700mm using it on a 500mm lens.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And with my 2X ii I get an "effective" 600mm when using it on a 300mm lens and an "effective" 1000mm using it on the 500mm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All this is&amp;nbsp;per the EXIF data. (example: &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/amfoto1/6865952788/in/set-72157622481646019"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/amfoto1/6865952788/in/set-72157622481646019&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rarely use either TC on zooms (too much of a hit to IQ for my tastes), but when I do the results are the same... EXIF shows my 70-200 + 1..4X "becomes" a 112- 280, for example&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;***********&lt;BR /&gt;Alan Myers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;San Jose, Calif., USA&lt;BR /&gt;"Walk softly and carry a big lens."&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A target="_blank" href="http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showpost.php?p=4185712&amp;amp;postcount=838&amp;quot;]GEAR"&gt;GEAR&lt;/A&gt;: 5DII, 7D(x2), 50D(x3), some other cameras, various lenses &amp;amp; accessories&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/amfoto1"&gt;FLICKR&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;amp; &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://amfoto1.printroom.com/"&gt;PRINTROOM&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:47:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>amfoto1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-11-15T18:47:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Extender 2xiii</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Extender-2xiii/m-p/48919#M19161</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Why am I only getting a focal length of 365 when I use my 2xiii with my 70-200?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:24:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Extender-2xiii/m-p/48919#M19161</guid>
      <dc:creator>seazr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-14T16:24:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Extender 2xiii</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Extender-2xiii/m-p/48963#M19162</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2" face="Arial, sans-serif"&gt;&lt;FONT color="#333333"&gt;Firstly off, the focal length of the lens itself never changes. It is a fundamental property of the lens.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#333333" size="2"&gt;&lt;FONT face="Arial, sans-serif"&gt;A Canon 2x tele-extender adds 58mm between the objective lens and the sensor plane. So by definition, the focal length of a 200mm lens is “changed” into a 258mm lens.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#333333"&gt;&lt;FONT face="Arial, sans-serif"&gt;&lt;FONT size="4"&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;This 2x tele-extender magnifies the central portion of the frame 2 times so it gives the same picture as a 400mm lens would.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 21:31:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Extender-2xiii/m-p/48963#M19162</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-14T21:31:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Extender 2xiii</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Extender-2xiii/m-p/49071#M19163</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Very interesting....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With my 1.4X ii I get an "effective" 420mm using it on a 300mm lens and an "effective" 700mm using it on a 500mm lens.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And with my 2X ii I get an "effective" 600mm when using it on a 300mm lens and an "effective" 1000mm using it on the 500mm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All this is&amp;nbsp;per the EXIF data. (example: &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/amfoto1/6865952788/in/set-72157622481646019"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/amfoto1/6865952788/in/set-72157622481646019&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rarely use either TC on zooms (too much of a hit to IQ for my tastes), but when I do the results are the same... EXIF shows my 70-200 + 1..4X "becomes" a 112- 280, for example&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;***********&lt;BR /&gt;Alan Myers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;San Jose, Calif., USA&lt;BR /&gt;"Walk softly and carry a big lens."&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A target="_blank" href="http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showpost.php?p=4185712&amp;amp;postcount=838&amp;quot;]GEAR"&gt;GEAR&lt;/A&gt;: 5DII, 7D(x2), 50D(x3), some other cameras, various lenses &amp;amp; accessories&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/amfoto1"&gt;FLICKR&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;amp; &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://amfoto1.printroom.com/"&gt;PRINTROOM&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:47:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Extender-2xiii/m-p/49071#M19163</guid>
      <dc:creator>amfoto1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-15T18:47:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Extender 2xiii</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Extender-2xiii/m-p/49093#M19164</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You are probably using a Canon brand converter on a Canon brand lens. I doubt the OP is.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I totally agree the penalty for using one is not worth it. Unless it is just the only way you can get your shot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have to use one whatever the lens brand is, is generally the best choice, however.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 20:37:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Extender-2xiii/m-p/49093#M19164</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-15T20:37:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Extender 2xiii</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Extender-2xiii/m-p/50109#M19165</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/26363"&gt;@seazr&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why am I only getting a focal length of 365 when I use my 2xiii with my 70-200?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unless you have tested it, making sure you are zoomed out all the way, I'ld say it's likely you're moving the zoom ring slightly as you make the photo. I frequently think I'm at maximum focal length only to get back to the computer and see that I'm not quite out there.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 17:39:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Extender-2xiii/m-p/50109#M19165</guid>
      <dc:creator>trulandphoto</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-20T17:39:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Extender 2xiii</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Extender-2xiii/m-p/50159#M19166</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I do believ you are right. I did find one image that was a full 400 focal length so, no surprise--it's operator error!!!!!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 19:45:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Extender-2xiii/m-p/50159#M19166</guid>
      <dc:creator>seazr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-20T19:45:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Extender 2xiii</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Extender-2xiii/m-p/50801#M19167</link>
      <description>I am unsure as to why you are having an issue. I have this same setup and used it all summer in Alaska with no issues.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 05:19:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Extender-2xiii/m-p/50801#M19167</guid>
      <dc:creator>ThomasSellberg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-11-25T05:19:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

