<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Canon  Lens (EF-S 17-85 mm. f/4-5.6 IS USM Standrd Zoom Lens) in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Canon-Lens-EF-S-17-85-mm-f-4-5-6-IS-USM-Standrd-Zoom-Lens/m-p/11335#M18729</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I've owned 2 copies of the 17-85 &amp;amp; neither was as good as the Sigma 18-200 or 18-200 OS I've also owned. It's a lens that hasn't really proven to be as good as many other more versatile lenses in &amp;amp; below it's price. I haven't used&amp;nbsp; the 15-85 but have read lots of very positive things about it including that it has excellent IQ.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cicopo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-01-14T23:39:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Canon  Lens (EF-S 17-85 mm. f/4-5.6 IS USM Standrd Zoom Lens)</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Canon-Lens-EF-S-17-85-mm-f-4-5-6-IS-USM-Standrd-Zoom-Lens/m-p/11253#M18728</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am plannin to buy Canon &amp;nbsp;Lens (EF-S 17-85 mm. f/4-5.6 IS USM Standrd Zoom Lens)&amp;nbsp;and would like to know a feedback on the same lens. I am a amateur photographer with interest in profile and nature photography. How is it different from its successor&amp;nbsp;&lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/products/cameras/ef_lens_lineup/ef_s_15_85mm_f_3_5_5_6_is_usm"&gt;EF-S&amp;nbsp;15-85mm&amp;nbsp;f/3.5-5.6 IS USM&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also I heard it has lots of issues (seen many comments from its buyers in internet). Please advice. My budget is &amp;lt;600$. Please suggest an alternative, if possible&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anil Krishnan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 03:56:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Canon-Lens-EF-S-17-85-mm-f-4-5-6-IS-USM-Standrd-Zoom-Lens/m-p/11253#M18728</guid>
      <dc:creator>anilkris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-14T03:56:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Canon  Lens (EF-S 17-85 mm. f/4-5.6 IS USM Standrd Zoom Lens)</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Canon-Lens-EF-S-17-85-mm-f-4-5-6-IS-USM-Standrd-Zoom-Lens/m-p/11335#M18729</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've owned 2 copies of the 17-85 &amp;amp; neither was as good as the Sigma 18-200 or 18-200 OS I've also owned. It's a lens that hasn't really proven to be as good as many other more versatile lenses in &amp;amp; below it's price. I haven't used&amp;nbsp; the 15-85 but have read lots of very positive things about it including that it has excellent IQ.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/Canon-Lens-EF-S-17-85-mm-f-4-5-6-IS-USM-Standrd-Zoom-Lens/m-p/11335#M18729</guid>
      <dc:creator>cicopo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-14T23:39:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

