<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: EF 17-40/4 L US,  EF 16-35mm/2.8 L USM II or Samyang AF14/2.8 on EOS R? in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EF-17-40-4-L-US-EF-16-35mm-2-8-L-USM-II-or-Samyang-AF14-2-8-on/m-p/328945#M1791</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/108935"&gt;@No-Frills&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My last considaration: the EF 17-40/4 L US is cheaper than the EF 16-35mm/2.8 L USM II and maybe a cheap substitute until another options ar available. I hope that Sigma or Tamron launch a soon a similar lens. Or Canon comes with somethng affordable in the range of 15 to 18mm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;The typically reliable Canon Rumors has recently stated, in no uncertain terms, that Sigma will begin making RF mount lenses in 2021. Hope it's true.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2020 23:17:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>John_SD</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-12-24T23:17:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EF 17-40/4 L US,  EF 16-35mm/2.8 L USM II or Samyang AF14/2.8 on EOS R?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EF-17-40-4-L-US-EF-16-35mm-2-8-L-USM-II-or-Samyang-AF14-2-8-on/m-p/328731#M1788</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I want to complement my R equipment. I have the EOS R and may follow. I need sometimes more than 24mm and bokeh isn't an issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Samyang AF14/2.8 may be a good option. But I can't mount a filter. I photograph often in harsh conditions, e.g. constructions aereas.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My second thought: can the EF 17-40/4 L US or EF 16-35mm/2.8 L USM II image quality keep up to the R/R5?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My last considaration: the EF 17-40/4 L US is cheaper than the EF 16-35mm/2.8 L USM II and maybe a cheap substitute until another options ar available. I hope that Sigma or Tamron launch a soon a similar lens. Or Canon comes with somethng affordable in the range of 15 to 18mm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2020 23:06:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EF-17-40-4-L-US-EF-16-35mm-2-8-L-USM-II-or-Samyang-AF14-2-8-on/m-p/328731#M1788</guid>
      <dc:creator>No-Frills</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-22T23:06:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EF 17-40/4 L US,  EF 16-35mm/2.8 L USM II or Samyang AF14/2.8 on EOS R?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EF-17-40-4-L-US-EF-16-35mm-2-8-L-USM-II-or-Samyang-AF14-2-8-on/m-p/328739#M1789</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You have an RF mount body. &amp;nbsp;You should only consider RF mount lenses, especially if you are considering an R5.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2020 00:21:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EF-17-40-4-L-US-EF-16-35mm-2-8-L-USM-II-or-Samyang-AF14-2-8-on/m-p/328739#M1789</guid>
      <dc:creator>Waddizzle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-23T00:21:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EF 17-40/4 L US,  EF 16-35mm/2.8 L USM II or Samyang AF14/2.8 on EOS R?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EF-17-40-4-L-US-EF-16-35mm-2-8-L-USM-II-or-Samyang-AF14-2-8-on/m-p/328923#M1790</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"You should only consider RF mount lenses, especially if you are considering an R5."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This only makes sense.&amp;nbsp; And, stick with Canon unless there is no Canon to consider.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2020 15:35:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EF-17-40-4-L-US-EF-16-35mm-2-8-L-USM-II-or-Samyang-AF14-2-8-on/m-p/328923#M1790</guid>
      <dc:creator>ebiggs1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-24T15:35:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EF 17-40/4 L US,  EF 16-35mm/2.8 L USM II or Samyang AF14/2.8 on EOS R?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EF-17-40-4-L-US-EF-16-35mm-2-8-L-USM-II-or-Samyang-AF14-2-8-on/m-p/328945#M1791</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/108935"&gt;@No-Frills&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My last considaration: the EF 17-40/4 L US is cheaper than the EF 16-35mm/2.8 L USM II and maybe a cheap substitute until another options ar available. I hope that Sigma or Tamron launch a soon a similar lens. Or Canon comes with somethng affordable in the range of 15 to 18mm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;The typically reliable Canon Rumors has recently stated, in no uncertain terms, that Sigma will begin making RF mount lenses in 2021. Hope it's true.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2020 23:17:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EF-17-40-4-L-US-EF-16-35mm-2-8-L-USM-II-or-Samyang-AF14-2-8-on/m-p/328945#M1791</guid>
      <dc:creator>John_SD</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-24T23:17:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EF 17-40/4 L US,  EF 16-35mm/2.8 L USM II or Samyang AF14/2.8 on EOS R?</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EF-17-40-4-L-US-EF-16-35mm-2-8-L-USM-II-or-Samyang-AF14-2-8-on/m-p/329450#M1792</link>
      <description>I bought the 16-35 EF L 4.0 is right before buying an R6 (R5 on its way). Great lens at a great price, and works excellently with the R6 and Canon adapter.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2020 16:34:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/EF-17-40-4-L-US-EF-16-35mm-2-8-L-USM-II-or-Samyang-AF14-2-8-on/m-p/329450#M1792</guid>
      <dc:creator>WagerD</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-29T16:34:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

