<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: prime lens in EF &amp; RF Lenses</title>
    <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/prime-lens/m-p/70379#M16801</link>
    <description>As Cicopo says, on your crop sensor 60d, you would do well with a 50mm or an 85mm length. This is because the "classic portrait length lens" is 85 to 135mm on a full frame sensor. On the 1.6x crop bodies, you therefore are looking at a 50mm or 85mm. 135 would be awfully long.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If your baseball portraits are of the full-body, holding a bat variety, you will want to stay down at the wider 50mm length or you will have to stand back a long way to get the whole body in.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;That said, you already own a really great portrait lens in your 70-200 f/2.8. See below:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Canon-Lenses/Canon-Portrait-Lens.aspx"&gt;http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Canon-Lenses/Canon-Portrait-Lens.aspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Good luck!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:23:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ScottyP</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-02-21T00:23:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>prime lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/prime-lens/m-p/70317#M16795</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;I only use a 70-200 f2.8L IS II USM&amp;nbsp;telephoto lens to take baseball pictures, however, I am going to be taken players portrait pictures. I need advice of which &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Canon&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;prime&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;lenses I should choose for my Canon 60D camera. Thank you&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 20:23:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/prime-lens/m-p/70317#M16795</guid>
      <dc:creator>kertl7779</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-20T20:23:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: prime lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/prime-lens/m-p/70319#M16796</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;35 mm or 50 mm should do nicely.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 20:26:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/prime-lens/m-p/70319#M16796</guid>
      <dc:creator>cicopo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-20T20:26:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: prime lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/prime-lens/m-p/70321#M16797</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You don't have to spend money for Prime Lens, the 70-200 F2.8L IS II is great for potrait. Unless you really want to get a prime lens, then the 85 F1.2L,&amp;nbsp; or 135 F2 are highly recommended lens by potrait photographer. For me, I think your current lens is already really good.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 20:30:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/prime-lens/m-p/70321#M16797</guid>
      <dc:creator>hsbn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-20T20:30:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: prime lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/prime-lens/m-p/70335#M16798</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Keep in mind it's a crop body so the 50 acts like 80 mm.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 21:16:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/prime-lens/m-p/70335#M16798</guid>
      <dc:creator>cicopo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-20T21:16:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: prime lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/prime-lens/m-p/70339#M16799</link>
      <description>then the 35 mm will be the best choice, thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 21:34:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/prime-lens/m-p/70339#M16799</guid>
      <dc:creator>kertl7779</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-20T21:34:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: prime lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/prime-lens/m-p/70341#M16800</link>
      <description>Thanks for your suggestion. If that is the case, it will work for me. I don't have to change lenses all the time.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2014 21:36:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/prime-lens/m-p/70341#M16800</guid>
      <dc:creator>kertl7779</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-20T21:36:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: prime lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/prime-lens/m-p/70379#M16801</link>
      <description>As Cicopo says, on your crop sensor 60d, you would do well with a 50mm or an 85mm length. This is because the "classic portrait length lens" is 85 to 135mm on a full frame sensor. On the 1.6x crop bodies, you therefore are looking at a 50mm or 85mm. 135 would be awfully long.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If your baseball portraits are of the full-body, holding a bat variety, you will want to stay down at the wider 50mm length or you will have to stand back a long way to get the whole body in.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;That said, you already own a really great portrait lens in your 70-200 f/2.8. See below:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Canon-Lenses/Canon-Portrait-Lens.aspx"&gt;http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Canon-Lenses/Canon-Portrait-Lens.aspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Good luck!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:23:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/prime-lens/m-p/70379#M16801</guid>
      <dc:creator>ScottyP</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-21T00:23:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: prime lens</title>
      <link>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/prime-lens/m-p/70391#M16802</link>
      <description>Super info, thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:58:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.usa.canon.com/t5/EF-RF-Lenses/prime-lens/m-p/70391#M16802</guid>
      <dc:creator>kertl7779</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-21T00:58:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

